• These commercial threads are for private transactions. diyAudio.com provides these forums for the convenience of our members, but makes no warranty nor assumes any responsibility. We do not vet any members, use of this facility is at your own risk. Customers can post any issues in those threads as long as it is done in a civil manner. All diyAudio rules about conduct apply and will be enforced.

Salas low shunt Group-design by Salas

Status
Not open for further replies.
I have been testing a few low voltage versions of Quanghao's Salas reg.
all between 5V and 9V
I am finding that the resistor setting Vref is not holding a stable voltage due to variations in current through the CCS. It varies with input voltage and it varies with warm up.
I have not tried using them cased up, so don't know how well they hold voltage with changes in ambient temperature.

Mine have exhibited the same problems, even cased. I'll try your suggestion and report back. I also had a strange high frequency oscillation as well in the low voltage version that I haven't tracked down.
 
Qusp,
you can convert the +ve regs to -ve by using the -ve BOM components.
Take care to swap the semis around so that they face the correct polarity.
The jFETs used as CCS can have the middle, gate leg bent across and soldered to the source leg, the two legged device now fits the two outer pads of the sk170 location.

I have already tested this. It works.

thanks for the tip Andrew, i'll give that a shot in the next few days, I do prefer your idea of all negative reg layout though, as seems easier to convert that way while still using cheaper and more available devices.

Hi Andrew,
What's the benefit of the negative reg over the positive one?

cheaper and easier to find parts is my favorite

yes,
both can be converted to the other polarity, if you are very careful to use the correct BOM and reverse or not the semiconductors. Plus the CCS jFET mod.

These markings & pads could all be accommodated on the PCB to help avoid confusion, if the instructions were clearly written for "normal -ve" and for "converted +ve"

+1, but I do think that to keep this clear that perhaps it might be better if someone with better written english language skills did (or at least checked) this. no offense to Q H here, English isnt his first language

I have been testing a few low voltage versions of Quanghao's Salas reg.
all between 5V and 9V
I am finding that the resistor setting Vref is not holding a stable voltage due to variations in current through the CCS. It varies with input voltage and it varies with warm up.
I have not tried using them cased up, so don't know how well they hold voltage with changes in ambient temperature.

some of the semiconductors have a small -ve temp coeff. Some have a small +ve temp coeff. The CCS (Q3// to BJT) is very sensitive to temperature.
selecting different Idss reduces the sensitivity to temperature. But it far from good.
Replacing the Vref resistor with LEDs and/or diodes and/or Zener provides a much better Vref.
I have modified 4PCBs to incorporate 2 to 4 LEDs + low value VR (100r).
This holds voltage much better. It saves running out of jFETs with Idss 6.3mA to 7.5mA

I have a couple of PCBs that are hotrodded to 830mA and these are poor at holding the output voltage when this hot. They were very good at 162mA and 325mA <-0.01%output per Volt of variation at input. These are 8.4V with 4LEDs and 0r0 using 8.1mA Idss for Q3. I am still looking at what can be done to improve the hotrodded versions. I think I will compare to a resistor Vref to see how this behaves hotrodded.
The 830mA varies from 8.395V (at 20V input) to 8.484V (at 15V input). The input is from a regulated Lab Supply. Yes, a neg Volt coeff of -0.2% per volt

this is great info again AndrewT, especially as i'm just about to build a couple low Vout regs at 3v3, 1v8 and 250ma

Many moons ago I suggested that Vref should allow locations for a LED + Zener + VR. I now request that this is a minimum requirement for a SALAS Vref.

Quanghao.
On your PCBs there is sufficient room where VR & L4 fit to place 4 3mmdiam LEDs and a resistor. It does not waste any more space but gives significant performance improvement.

x2 here, this would be fantastic!, this is what I love about Peranders superreg, t has alternate mappings for all refs and a couple different packages. I also I have about 300 3mm green LEDs. for now i'll just knock up a little perfboard 'patch'
 
I'm sorry but this went on for too long and changed way too many times for me to keep track. Also, last time I saw the price of the set, I couldn't really afford to pay for the boards I want anymore, so I'll remove myself from the list for now.

Please Update the list yourselves when you type here:

1 - TFAN69 - 1set
2 - Komigenie - 2 set
3 - pop music - 2 set
4 - Royalbee - 2 set
5 - h-wan - 3 set
6 - rothay - 3 set
7 - ben-jam-in-3 set
8 - Superluca71 - 2 set
9 - suburra - 2 set
10 - Joshua_G – 2 set
11 - dbratny - 4 sets
12 - rpeter - 3 sets
13 -Sunsun22: 2sets
14 - Sergelisses: 1 set
15 - Studiostevus: 2 sets (shipping after 15 january)
16 - qusp: 4 sets
17 - Kuka: 2 sets
18 - Ferrari: 4 sets
19 - cerfer: 2 sets
20 - leejh: 2 sets
21 - drspence: 2 sets
22 - albrerta: 1 set
23 - Bernie: 1 set
24 - Chul: 2 sets
25 - dggs: 2 sets

And ,
Please Update the list not get last PCB:

1. stephen1212 (ordered 10 received 0 need 4 sets )
2. fitzfish (received 1 set, still need remaining 3 sets)
3. ramallo
4. claudio
5. kp93300 ( 2sets)
 
Im sorry very, Im later

This is layout, the comments you add me, Thanks
Quanghao
 

Attachments

  • Salas-low-shunt-x-5.jpg
    Salas-low-shunt-x-5.jpg
    506.2 KB · Views: 388
I can't see the sense traces to monitor the output voltage.

You must change Vref to a minimum of 3 components: LED + Zener + resistor and if room an extra LED or optional VR.

All the jFET (sk170) locations could be changed to 4pad from the existing 3pad.
The alternative gate pads would connect to the opposite side drain/source pads. This simple one extra pad avoids the need to modify the jFET if converting polarity of the PSU. And requires no extra PCB space !!!

I like the new smaller size, 41 by 110 is more manageable.
 
Last edited:
I have a couple of PCBs that are hotrodded to 830mA and these are poor at holding the output voltage when this hot. They were very good at 162mA and 325mA <-0.01%output per Volt of variation at input. These are 8.4V with 4LEDs and 0r0 using 8.1mA Idss for Q3. I am still looking at what can be done to improve the hotrodded versions. I think I will compare to a resistor Vref to see how this behaves hotrodded.
The 830mA varies from 8.395V (at 20V input) to 8.484V (at 15V input). The input is from a regulated Lab Supply. Yes, a neg Volt coeff of -0.2% per volt

Many moons ago I suggested that Vref should allow locations for a LED + Zener + VR. I now request that this is a minimum requirement for a SALAS Vref.

Back in the days of this reg's development I have wrote in its own thread and in the phono's thread maybe, that the Vref regarding noise and drift is open to choice. I regard it as a sub-circuit with its own spec goals. There was a PCB artwork design we recommended (from an Australian member) that had a connector for a sub-board even. There were Zener (early phono), Leds (Hypno, Mez) also. The pros of the Norton variable ref are low and benign noise, easily filtered, and simplicity/cost. Good sonics for just a Jfet and a resistor also if someone trusts anecdotal experience. Some client applications are not sensitive in drift and settling time due to tempco(s) for their bias, some are demanding. Up to 10V-15V, Leds are a good and cheap solution, I also prefer them subjectively between other simple active VRef for that range, that is why I used them in DCB1s. Common Zeners are aggressive for pink like noise and unreliable between samples, also need high Idss to be 'grabbed' well, I have even seen near DC cyclic ups and downs if not. I would recommend LM329 but its almost single vendor, scarce and expensive these days especially for non Americans. $10 each even on Ebay. An agreable solution for good Tc would be a TL431 best run at about 1mA from a degenerated Idss source, variable with a trimmer up to 36V and shunted by a 1000uF very low ESR cap, because its noise will be much higher than an LM329 or Leds. As for simple Norton, 1W low ppm resistors (eg Dale) are helping for substituting the multiturn which is high ppm and has tiny wiper that runs not very cool. It all depends on judging the application or how exact someone wants to reach, the simple Norton proved not giving real practical problems to many users as far as I have gathered up to now and lends nice tonality non the less. Anyway that was just a short sum up of my experience with various Vrefs in this type of reg and its variations, I trust that the most demanding and experienced amongst you will find what suits you best. Happy new year to all!
 
I'm sorry but this went on for too long and changed way too many times for me to keep track. Also, last time I saw the price of the set, I couldn't really afford to pay for the boards I want anymore, so I'll remove myself from the list for now.

Please Update the list yourselves when you type here:

1 - TFAN69 - 1set
2 - Komigenie - 2 set
3 - pop music - 2 set
4 - Royalbee - 2 set
5 - h-wan - 3 set
6 - rothay - 3 set
7 - ben-jam-in-3 set
8 - Superluca71 - 2 set
9 - suburra - 2 set
10 - Joshua_G – 2 set
11 - dbratny - 4 sets
12 - rpeter - 3 sets
13 -Sunsun22: 2sets
14 - Sergelisses: 1 set
15 - Studiostevus: 2 sets (shipping after 15 january)
16 - qusp: 4 sets
17 - Kuka: 2 sets
18 - Ferrari: 4 sets
19 - cerfer: 2 sets
20 - leejh: 2 sets
21 - drspence: 2 sets
22 - albrerta: 1 set
23 - Bernie: 1 set
24 - Chul: 2 sets
25 - dggs: 2 sets
26 - luvdunhill: 1 set

And ,
Please Update the list not get last PCB:

1. stephen1212 (ordered 10 received 0 need 4 sets )
2. fitzfish (received 1 set, still need remaining 3 sets)
3. ramallo
4. claudio
5. kp93300 ( 2sets)
 
where has the sense gone? I concur with all AndrewT's suggestions with the jfet pads, which we have been talking about quite a bit and many agree. as I mentioned I would love to see optional TO220 pads for the diodes, takes up no extra space and means I can stop bending them to fit. of course sense lines can be hacked in by the end user, but its not ideal, I would love to see connections for AMC coax connectors there for the sense lines personally; a man can dream.
 
I remove my self too ...

Please Update the list yourselves when you type here:

1 - TFAN69 - 1set
2 - pop music - 2 set
3 - Royalbee - 2 set
4 - h-wan - 3 set
5 - rothay - 3 set
6 - ben-jam-in-3 set
7 - Superluca71 - 2 set
8 - suburra - 2 set
9 - Joshua_G – 2 set
10 - dbratny - 4 sets
11 - rpeter - 3 sets
12 -Sunsun22: 2sets
13 - Sergelisses: 1 set
14 - Studiostevus: 2 sets (shipping after 15 january)
15 - qusp: 4 sets
16 - Kuka: 2 sets
17 - Ferrari: 4 sets
18 - cerfer: 2 sets
19 - leejh: 2 sets
20 - drspence: 2 sets
21 - albrerta: 1 set
22 - Bernie: 1 set
23 - Chul: 2 sets
24 - dggs: 2 sets
25 - luvdunhill: 1 set

And ,
Please Update the list not get last PCB:

1. stephen1212 (ordered 10 received 0 need 4 sets )
2. fitzfish (received 1 set, still need remaining 3 sets)
3. ramallo
4. claudio
5. kp93300 ( 2sets)
 
I hesitated to write something about this, but I felt like getting some more opinions..

I ordered 2 of the previous boards from QH, and I had a look at my paypal payment for these: it was 34$ for 2! boards. So I am wondering why nobody is wondering about this...
Price has doubled, and for me this seems to be not a group buy, but more of a normal business with the goal of making profit.
I cannot imagine a small PCB from Vietnam being more than 25$.
Am I wrong? Is this a real price?
I think that GBs are a wonderful way to come to very nice projects, and it is important to stay NOT COMMERCIAL in this thread, for many reasons. One would be, for example, to protect professional vendors, who pay taxes, give warranties, provide clear instructions, put a lot of time and effort in their products, which makes them more expensive of course.
In this case it is Salas wonderful design, members are asked to contribute to the project with their knowledge, to get rid of some bugs and provide variability; so this is a pure diy project, which is based to a big extend on trust.
And trust is exactly what I missing right now...So I do not order boards, and maybe I am not the only one who is thinking that way.

And, once more, maybe I am totally wrong, and this is the real cost, and i am just a suspicious nerd. In this case I apologize deeply to QH in advance, that I couldn't keep my mouth shut.

Cheers,

Juergen
 
Our thread title includes "Group-design".

What do we need?
Can one universal PCB satisfy the majority?

Where would we like the power FETs located?
along the edge of the PCB
or
in the middle of the PCB
or
?? some other places??

Do we want a universal PCB? All voltages <60Vinput(40Vac)? Convertible to either polarity?

We can take the best of features already posted and combine them into "our" version of a Salas type Shunt Reg.
 
Hi All!,
Last buy QH said he lost money,alot of people want shipping tracking,gold plating rose also,several people didn't get their boards,so those will hopefully be made up out of the second buy,I did get my 2 I ordered but my name went on and off the list so I crossed my fingers about dilervery MAYBE it's time for someone to design a different setup with a BOM and maybe ONE post to set it up and use it,
NOT throwing any rocks here,Group buys are good when they run smooth,but when not It's alot to handle.............
 
1. Information Salas Shunt regulator module for Clock, DAC, Phono, Pre:
Out put from +1.5V to + 35V One PCB * 4 supply*
1. 1 x voltage + 5Vout to + 35Vout
2. 1 x voltage + 5Vout to + 35Vout
3. 1 voltage -5Vout to -35Vout
4. 1 x voltage + 1.5Vout to + 5Vout
One set : You can split into three separate PCB

2. The price includes:
1. One Set + Worldwide shipping + paypal fee = 18 $/ One Set 2 . Tow set + Worldwide shipping + paypal fee = 34 $ / 2 Sets 3. Over 3 set.....+ Worldwide shipping + paypal fee = 16 $/ one Set

3. PCB plans to make and send
I have completed the perfect layout for low shunt Salas.
So you send me money starting from 9-10 to 15-10-2010.
I started to put the PCB 16 -10-2010. Estimated 27 -10-2010 I will send to all your PCB.

4. Shipping from Vietnam: (surface mail)

Ordering:
pls sent me a PM with the following information:
Forum ID:
Real Name:
Shipping address:
Paypal account email:
The list of items, the quantity, and options
Your phone number: ( it is very important for you get PCB)
Payment:
my papal: quanghao168@yahoo.com.vn

Shipping:
Shipment by Vietnam Post International Registered mail
T?ng công ty B?u chính Vi?t Nam > Trang ch?

Thank you very much!
Quanghao

This was the original deal. Substantially different than the current one.

One question on behalf of the 5 individuals who didn't receive their boards, if shipment was via registered mail as suggested above why can't the missing packages be tracked ?

That said perhaps a breakdown of the price is in order. I assume the cost of the missing boards is being spread over the new orders. That would account for about a 10 % increase. It was mentioned that the gold was more expensive so that is a little. Perhaps the shipping will be insured this time. Still all of this added to a $16 board (3 or more price) isn't a 2x increase is it?

Lastly why is the board layout being changed in ways clearly detrimental such as the missing sense lines? Smaller boards are less expensive not more. I don't want to scare people off of this project but I do think we need to revisit the design. Some very good and valuable suggestions have been made by some very knowledgeable members. I would like to see these ideas incorporated. Perhaps those who have made suggestions should sign off on any design before we jump into the ordering stage. I also remind people of some of the shipping suggestions like an insured drop shipment to north america for distribution. Potentially no more expensive, certainly more reliable delivery. Others thoughts?
 
I hesitated to write something about this, but I felt like getting some more opinions..

I ordered 2 of the previous boards from QH, and I had a look at my paypal payment for these: it was 34$ for 2! boards. So I am wondering why nobody is wondering about this...
Price has doubled, and for me this seems to be not a group buy, but more of a normal business with the goal of making profit.
I cannot imagine a small PCB from Vietnam being more than 25$.
Am I wrong? Is this a real price?
I think that GBs are a wonderful way to come to very nice projects, and it is important to stay NOT COMMERCIAL in this thread, for many reasons. One would be, for example, to protect professional vendors, who pay taxes, give warranties, provide clear instructions, put a lot of time and effort in their products, which makes them more expensive of course.
In this case it is Salas wonderful design, members are asked to contribute to the project with their knowledge, to get rid of some bugs and provide variability; so this is a pure diy project, which is based to a big extend on trust.
And trust is exactly what I missing right now...So I do not order boards, and maybe I am not the only one who is thinking that way.

And, once more, maybe I am totally wrong, and this is the real cost, and i am just a suspicious nerd. In this case I apologize deeply to QH in advance, that I couldn't keep my mouth shut.

Cheers,

Juergen

IMO well expressed my friend!!!
 
I think more transparency may help to solve the issues that have come up:

I think most of us don't like to deal with things like shipping etcetera, myself included.

So a 50 % higher price price (or maybe a fixed fee) for each PCB then actual cost in case of a high quantity GB would still be good for all individual buyers. Of course shipping cost plus Paypal fee needs to be added as well.

For a private project I am about two order 10 double sided (silkscreen also double sided) PCB's of 16 x 16 cm and the price is very accetable I can assure you.....



just my 2 cents

I can use 2 sets of boards...

Regards,

Jan
 
Status
Not open for further replies.