Rod Elliot P3A modification questions

Hello,

I have built the P3A several years ago, but for my taste, the sound is too clinical. I understand it is built for precision, and it does that very well, but it lacks the "warmth" that usually comes tweaked for branded amps. This warmth, as far as I understand, comes from an emphasis on bass and highs, with a decreased representation of the mid end, making it sound less-harsh and less-tiresome. ( like a V shaped equalization pattern ). So, I was thinking of making some adjustments, and with the help of Chat GPT, I identified some possible mods that I can make, but I would love it if anyone here had the time to validate if these can cause other issues with the amp and if these will actually affect the sound signature towards "warmth" :
low end :
  • increase C1 from 4.7 to 10 or even 22
  • increase C2 from 100 to 220pf or even 470pf
  • increase C3 from 100 to 220 or even 470
  • increase C5 from 100 to 220 or even 470
  • reduce R6 from 560 to 470 ( will this affect the recommended bias value ? )
  • C+, C- increased from 100 to 470 or even 1000

high end :
  • increase C4 from 100 to 150pf or even 220pf
  • reduce R11 and R12 from 220 to 180 ( same question, will this affect recommended bias ? )
  • add 2.2nF capacitor in parallel with R5

It was also suggested to increase R13 and R14 to 0.47 or even 0.56 to tone down the vocals

Another thing suggested is to use a combination of ceramic and metal film resistors, rather than full metal film, even though it will slightly affect precision it will also slightly introduce a tiny bit of pleasant distorsion. Also to use electrolytics instead of Polyprop for the same reason.

What of these advices do you think are feasible ?

Thanks in advance !

1738340003863.png
 
Some of those changes will have an audible effect if you're an elephant or a bat. Some make no sense. I have probed Chat GPT about electronics a few times, just for fun. Aside from general stuff you can find in Wikipedia, it has absolutely no idea. Please ignore.

Rather than messing with the P3A design, I think your best bet would be to put a 2 or 3-band tone control circuit in front of it and adjust to taste.
 
Currently it's fed directly by a Cambridge Audio DAC but I also plan to hook it to a P97 preamp stage with this rebuild, which will give me some tone control, but I would love to also make it naturally have a more curvy response, hence the modifications. I am not debating if it's everyone's opinion, just asking if the modifications proposed would help in my goal without bringing in any risks to the circuit, and more importantly, which of them would have the highest impact.
 
increase C1 from 4.7 to 10 or even 22 - This will lower the low frequency F-3 from ~1.5 Hz to ~0.75 Hz or ~0.375 Hz (elephant frequencies)
increase C2 from 100 to 220pf or even 470pf - This will lower the high frequency F-3 from ~1.6 MHz to ~800 kHz or ~400 kHz (bat frequencies)
increase C3 from 100 to 220 or even 470 - Pretty much the same as C1
increase C5 from 100 to 220 or even 470 - No effect on frequency response
reduce R6 from 560 to 470 - No effect on frequency response, will throw off DC offset
C+, C- increased from 100 to 470 or even 1000 - No effect on frequency response, only ripple
increase C4 from 100 to 150pf or even 220pf - Reduce open loop gain by ~3.5 dB or ~6 dB, increased distortion across the band
reduce R11 and R12 from 220 to 180 - No effect on frequency response, will require quiescent current readjustment
add 2.2nF capacitor in parallel with R5 - I haven't checked the P3A specifically, but in a similar CFP output stage amp with the same 22k / 1k feedback, this reduces the phase margin from ~75º to ~3º, turning the amp into a very powerful oscillator
 
  • Like
Reactions: thermionic
Other options:
  1. Put a tubed based DAC or preamp or in front of it.
  2. Build one of those Pass H2 harmonic generators here
  3. Build a whole new amp - a tube amp

The Harmonic generator kit is $8, and probably cheaper than any single cap you had listed in your mods.
 
Option 1 is the single largest thread generator of the tube section of DIYaudio.com. Absolutely worst advice possible. Sorry.

Apparently it is missed that no one needs a tube preamp with a gain of 100 when connecting a 2V rms source of the last 20 years to a semiconductor power amplifier that has normal 1V input sensitivity.

If I had the money I would pay for a stroboscopic flashing very annoying continuously popping up advertisement banner here to NOT connect randomly chosen tube preamps with random parameters to standardised semi amplifiers.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: john65b
If anyone can provide a definition of that “warm” sound, please let me know. I once created a simple little DSP application that allowed me to add a variable amount of second harmonic to a signal. And whatever it is, the “warm” sound ain’t that. It sounded anything but warm.
 
  • Like
Reactions: thermionic
increase C1 from 4.7 to 10 or even 22 - This will lower the low frequency F-3 from ~1.5 Hz to ~0.75 Hz or ~0.375 Hz (elephant frequencies)
increase C2 from 100 to 220pf or even 470pf - This will lower the high frequency F-3 from ~1.6 MHz to ~800 kHz or ~400 kHz (bat frequencies)
increase C3 from 100 to 220 or even 470 - Pretty much the same as C1
increase C5 from 100 to 220 or even 470 - No effect on frequency response
reduce R6 from 560 to 470 - No effect on frequency response, will throw off DC offset
C+, C- increased from 100 to 470 or even 1000 - No effect on frequency response, only ripple
increase C4 from 100 to 150pf or even 220pf - Reduce open loop gain by ~3.5 dB or ~6 dB, increased distortion across the band
reduce R11 and R12 from 220 to 180 - No effect on frequency response, will require quiescent current readjustment
add 2.2nF capacitor in parallel with R5 - I haven't checked the P3A specifically, but in a similar CFP output stage amp with the same 22k / 1k feedback, this reduces the phase margin from ~75º to ~3º, turning the amp into a very powerful oscillator
Thank you very much sir, that is what I was looking for, thank you for your time. I will try building the P97 preamp and adding it to the signal path, and if I still don't like it I will try to search the internet for a different DIY amplifier schematic with more of a warm, vintage sound.

To njswede: to me ( and apparently others online ) , it looks like a certain level of V-shape curve rather than flat frequency response, ephasizing deep bass more, then gradually dropping to 0 db at around 350 hz, keeping a linear response up to around 3-4khz, when the curve goes up again in the highs.
1738358330843.png

Just an example of the general idea I found online fast, but with a wider 0 db line at the middle as explained before
 
Similar to what the "loudness" switch of many amps does actually, but the purpose there is to compensate for these frequencies at low volume levels, however the general idea is similar ( and no wonder on one of my older Sony amps that had a loudness switch I would just permanently keep it on regardless of volume level because the sound is much better imo rather than flat and "loud", tiresome )
 
...sound signature towards "warmth"...

Consider getting different speakers or testing the ones now with different gear. The speakers probably color the sound more than the amplifier. Then consider the music source. Streamers such as Spotify and Tidal modify the sound in some way. Recordings from the previous millennium are remastered and upverted. Modern recordings are sometimes done by the artists themselves who are not recording engineers. I would prefer to get CDs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: njswede
Numerous threads can be found regarding P3A modifications and such, just hit the search button. P3A is one amp that is very sensitive to changes, you may get it to work but it won't be for long. P3A when built right is totally stable with a very good SQ.
If you want to make some changes do not listen to ChatGPT, run a simulation instead.

Albert