Are you now accusing me of lying and trolling? And making a fool out of me with that 3D print?
If I could I would take the post down.
Maybe if you took a closer look for a minute at the video and try to figure out what is happing here that would help. Maybe think of the word capacitance. Not my style to respond like this, but you keep coming with nonsense and extremely rude remarks.
If I could I would take the post down.
Maybe if you took a closer look for a minute at the video and try to figure out what is happing here that would help. Maybe think of the word capacitance. Not my style to respond like this, but you keep coming with nonsense and extremely rude remarks.
No one is accusing you of lying. You haven't provided enough information to lie. I would love to discuss the design with you and others, but you haven't provided enough basic information to have a discussion.
What makes you think my print isn't part of a speaker? I mean, jeez, look at it! Why don't you ask me about it? I might tell you something if you ask the right questions, but then again, I might not. You should know that I will maintain strict control of the discussion. Information will be provided to worthy supplicants at my, and only my, discretion.
What makes you think my print isn't part of a speaker? I mean, jeez, look at it! Why don't you ask me about it? I might tell you something if you ask the right questions, but then again, I might not. You should know that I will maintain strict control of the discussion. Information will be provided to worthy supplicants at my, and only my, discretion.
I'm showing myself out. No need for this as I am obviously not a worthy supplicant.
BTW the patent number is WO 2022/123512 A2, have fun with it.
BTW the patent number is WO 2022/123512 A2, have fun with it.
Last edited:
Just to be clear, this is a relatively new phenomenon. Older patents were often remarkably clear and detailed.
Being able to reproduce the device in question from the description used to be one of the criteria for patentability, since the whole idea was to eventually have useful designs get into the public domain. Intentionally writing things that obscure intentions and do nothing but block other's ability to function in the space is a newer "approach" to patents.
In case anyone is still here and still interested, here's a link to the patent.
As I read it, the "innovation" is to mold the stator wires into the support structure to provide better insulation against the bias voltage than paint or some other coating (normal wire insulation?) would provide. Oh, and to optimize the open area for a given speaker, and to drive it directly with a high voltage amplifier. Ooh! That's never been done before! (I'm being sarcastic)...
As I read it, the "innovation" is to mold the stator wires into the support structure to provide better insulation against the bias voltage than paint or some other coating (normal wire insulation?) would provide. Oh, and to optimize the open area for a given speaker, and to drive it directly with a high voltage amplifier. Ooh! That's never been done before! (I'm being sarcastic)...
Who wonders?
I did not further investigate if all other of Mr. Diego Barone's patents are as brillant and innovative as this one. I also admit that I stopped reading midway, thus skipping (meant: avoiding) the MOSFET's part of it. Being fed up by the previous content. No need, no interest for further reading. Jan Didden et al. here on the forum certainly have posted way better, precise, out-from-the-real informations about directly driving ESL's.
Last edited: