Agreed.FrankWW said:The idea that an ordinary person can get maximum benefit from education by not relying on others for assistance, validation, knowledge, and so forth, is absurd.
Two different approaches:
1. "How do I work out the LF cutoff for a circuit with an input coupling cap?"
2. "What will be the LF cutoff for this circuit?"
The first person is looking for understanding. The second is just looking for an answer.
If it is 40 years since you were at university you might not realise how much they have changed. I was shocked when I went back after about a 20 year gap.
What did you expect in a situation where education has become commoditised?
The answer to this has already been given. If responding to a request for assistance with an academic query offends your sensibilities, just don't do it.
There are plenty more sizable moral issues in life than this one, and ultimately its the academic staff who are paid to sort the wheat from the chaff.
The answer to this has already been given. If responding to a request for assistance with an academic query offends your sensibilities, just don't do it.
There are plenty more sizable moral issues in life than this one, and ultimately its the academic staff who are paid to sort the wheat from the chaff.
peer review is an accepted method of learning in the Scottish Education system.We were pretty fierce:
"Patricia will have your guts for garters if you don't footnote this stuff."
"If you don't read the books, you won't pass. You do realize that, don't you?"
" What does this paragraph mean? What's your argument?"
We were insufferable.
The idea that an ordinary person can get maximum benefit from education by not relying on others for assistance, validation, knowledge,
I used it at my schools. My school promoted it's use as a teaching tool. The Education Authority saw it's value.
I undergo peer review in my professional life.
Most of my designs were reviewed before the design was constructed.
Once I entered teaching, we regularly carry out peer review. Both sides learn from the observation and particularly during the feedback.
Agreed.
Two different approaches:
1. "How do I work out the LF cutoff for a circuit with an input coupling cap?"
2. "What will be the LF cutoff for this circuit?"
The first person is looking for understanding. The second is just looking for an answer.
If it is 40 years since you were at university you might not realise how much they have changed. I was shocked when I went back after about a 20 year gap.
I graduated with a BS in Engineering in 1979, and in 2009 went back for a few masters EE courses. Both experiences lead me to the same conclusion - never is a simple "answer" accepted as the solution to a homework, project, or test. Maybe in other disciplines, but not engineering.
I always had to start with proper equations, manipulate them, insert knowns and unknowns, and solve, showing all work to get credit for a right final answer. Also got credit for partial solution if approach was right, but answer was wrong.
If someone has already worked out a solution, and wants independent verification of the correct answer before submitting, 2) above may be fine.
I just don't see how the naked answer, as implied in 2) above, would ever get anyone any credit, especially on something they had to "take home".
Of course in every design office there are those who can (and do), and those who should be teaching.
Teaching _is_ doing, and if you claim otherwise you would have the blind leading the blind. How does that make sense?
Non issue. There just are not enough posts like that to worry about it.
Bigger fish, go fry them.
Bigger fish, go fry them.
... Could it be all under 14's or under 16's or under xx? must declare their Date of Birth (DOB) ...
DOB should not be given, neither asked for as it forms a part of that crucial set of information that can be used for identity theft.
So much for the theoretical discussion. Now let's see you apply it to a practical example:
"Transfer Funtion of the given circuit ?"
Dale
"Transfer Funtion of the given circuit ?"
Dale
So much for the theoretical discussion. Now let's see you apply it to a practical example:
SY did admirably.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Member Areas
- The Lounge
- pupils and students on the Forum