Power cords and plugs (split from Beyond Ariel)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Jump to Latest
#224
davym said:
That's the problem. Many on here think that you are.
Click to expand...

I write what I mean very clearly. When others misread me, It's up to them, not up to me.

davym said:
Beliefs are a strange thing in many ways, most people make the simple error of thinking that their beliefs are their own when in fact they are usually acquired second hand from other people. When you appear to challenge these 'beliefs' people often get defensive. Many are happy to be accepted as part of the herd, some reject the herd and often have to pay the price for doing so. Sorry if this is blindingly obvious but it may not have occurred to some who might read this thread.
Click to expand...

The above is correct.

davym said:
Good luck to you.
Click to expand...

Thank you and good luck to you as well.
 
#231
SY said:
Try attacking the technical points rather than the people. If a technical point isn't being made or it's too self-evidently stupid to attack, then don't bother posting, you're just feeding someone's need for attention.

It's quite simple. 😀
Click to expand...

To be fair, confirmation bias is a known scientific phenomenon, so would that not be a "technical" point? 😉
 
#235
Joshua_G said:
I write what I mean very clearly. When others misread me, It's up to them, not up to me.

"I write what I mean very clearly" Your joking right? Trying to stir things up again I see. Congratulations Joshua as you have successfully managed to have a group of individuals "dazed & confused" Your an individual that excels in politico speak....talking in circles, using logic is particular instances, trying to invoke a discussion, when the logic comes back to you, then you take off in a tangent. Are you a politician? A political writer? A "law maker"? If not, you should change your career.
A few of us here can see thru your tangled mess of prose.
In the final analysis the technical, provable, scientific method prevails..........Your statements are just anecdotal.......the rest is to be ignored. This is one fish that did not get "hooked" by your prose , I merely took a sniff of your bait, goodbye.


__________________________________________________Rick........






The above is correct.



Thank you and good luck to you as well.
Click to expand...
 
#236
Even if I play one track consecutively, it seems different so how can anyone gauge the difference between tracks when a piece of inconsequential piece of wire is changed?
Click to expand...

Personally, as a technique, I listen to a track where some aspect of the sound is hovering at the edge of being acceptable, or unacceptable - if I were in a poor sound I'll be really irritated by that quality, and, conversely, if in a good quality I can live with it. Listen to that track, make the change, listen, change back, listen - did the "unpleasantness quotient" alter through the exercise?
 
#238
I'm only talking about using a piece of music, as a test instrument at a particular time, for a specific purpose: to assess whether a change has made an audible difference - if I'm just "listening to music" then my head's in a different space ...

As is the case for tuning a car - you accelerate hard to test performance improvements ... but don't keep doing that when taking the family for a drive ...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom