Poll for the participants of "John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part II"

On which kind of design are you interested the most

  • a design that is simple

    Votes: 7 11.3%
  • a design that is cheap

    Votes: 3 4.8%
  • a design that is “green”

    Votes: 2 3.2%
  • a no holds barred design that performs the best

    Votes: 50 80.6%

  • Total voters
    62
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
Member
Joined 2002
Paid Member
Mike posted this interesting post:

Your know Richard, when I first came across this forum I rather naively thought that everyone here was aiming to create the very best audio reproduction that is possible . . . but over the years I have realised that there many different mixes of motivations amoungst the members here - for instance some really prefer a design that is simple rather than a design that performs the best, others want or need their builds to be cheap and yet others want their designs to be "green".

I would be genuinely interested to know how what percentage of the people here aim for no holds barred very best performance.

Let's leave aside for now what "very best performance" actually means to each of us I'm just curious about the motivation thing.


Under the context of this post, the poll asks for answering on what kind of design your main interest is focused into

1. a design that is simple
2. a design that is cheap
3. a design that is “green”
4. a no holds barred design that performs the best


I think that 30 days is enough for all to participate.
Only one choise is possible


George
 
Last edited:
yeah, I cant answer. none of the first 3, not even close, but I cant quite answer 4, because there are things I wont do if it doesnt really provide enough benefit vs the trouble when it gets to the point of chasing performance that is already well beyond what I can hear.

I wouldnt, for example swap my first born. it shouldnt need to burn 1000W in idle while i'm out getting pissed because its so fragile, with such a tenuous grip on good sound that it cant cool down and takes 4 hrs to warm up ... thats just an aversion to inefficient design IMO, not so much green.

of the 4 thats the closest but I cant choose it
 
Last edited:
Motivation? Motivate me to do what? To build stereo gear instead of buy it? None of the above. I build it because I like building things. I like using (in this case listening to) things I built. I don't need to design it, but I also don't want a "kit" or paint-by-numbers, I want to select parts (although I generally avoid trendy boutique parts), do the casework and layout, wire stuff up.

I don't build these things to save money, but I have a general sense that I can build something good for less than it would cost to buy -- excluding tools, extra parts I bought because they looked nice and I thought I might have a use for them some day, etc. And shipping...

Hand in hand with that, I tend to believe that simpler designs stand a better chance of sounding good for less money, if well executed. But "simpler" is not what drives me, although it plays a role in the decisions I make about what I am going to build.

Green? Like qusp said, I don't want to pay for electric power that is wasted, but I don't mind shunting some current to ground to make a better-sounding voltage regulator either.

Absolute best sound? Really, I couldn't care less. I want it to sound good to me, which is a standard that evolves and is informed by cost, hassle, availability (of time, materials, energy, etc.) and probably other factors I can't think of. But I really don't compare what I build to the stuff in shops, or to some notion of "best", and I don't care how such a comparison would fare. Frankly the smell of hot solder flux is more important to me than the final result on some absolute scale.
 
I would think it is posible for all the veiwers, followers, what have you, to just treat this as a basic generailzed question??? Maybe if we just imagine that we logged on and there were 4 new posts, with the titles of the multiple choice answers... Which one would you read first?
This is not J.C.'s thread. There is no reason to continue acting like you do!
Let's stay away from that a bit better than we're doing. Please 😀
 
flg, it was started in direct reaction to and at the very same time as the convo in the JC thread as a continuation/extension of it... I cant answer, none suit, it would be a lie to answer any of them. I cant pretend i'm someone else and from the number of replies, I dont seem to be the only one ...

acting like I do? whats that, speaking my mind? sorry sir! anything you say sir!! 5 gallons of oil sir!!

given the choice of only those, with a gun to my head, I would say 4, but it would not be an honest answer.

there seems to be a growing misconception as to what politics is ..

my personal enjoyment/satisfaction and some obsession drives my DIYAUDIO habits, but I do have lines I wont cross, because its a hobby and needs to pay back. the end needs to in some way justify the means and I dont just mean objectively, that could be clean design, good numbers, great sound, pretty looks, nice symmetry etc but some things people insist on I would deem a fault. thats OK, its only audio
 
Last edited:
Best sounding 😀

To me, this topology (grossly simplified) of power amplifier is best sounding.
 

Attachments

  • AMP.PNG
    AMP.PNG
    78.9 KB · Views: 503
With the individuality of the avarage diy-er, how can you ever hope to get a usefull answer here? Of course everone builds what he thinks 'best' in one way or another. That's why you can't define 'best', and that's why nobody can really give a useful answer.

Then there's the expertise - someone building a p2p tube amp will have different perceptions of 'best' than someone who builds a chip amp from a kit, or yet again someone who designs his amp from scratch.

I can tell you how I look at it: I try to design from scratch the best I can but with reasonable resources, certainly not 'all out'. Can I do better at any one design? Probably, by trowing more money at it. Which I don't.
How do I decide what is enough resources for a specific design? Gut feeling - at some point it 'looks about right'.

jan
 
My primary goal for a one-off is usually to have the most-accurate reproduction. So I would not typically choose 1, 2, or 3 as the primary consideration.

Pet peeve: The mention of considering "green" characteristics is largely political and a good case could be made for banning discussion of it in those terms. Each individual has the right to decide what they are willing to pay to "waste".
 
haha, I don't actively participate in the BT II thread, when it is technical it is way over my head anyway. But for me none of the above. What motivates me is to do something different. It doesn't have to be better or best just something that someone else hasn't done (as far as I can see). If it works then all the better! 🙂

For someone like me with only enough knowledge to be dangerous that is a challenge 😉 and the amount of time my projects take to come to fruition probably is a relection of that!

As an example when I decided to make an LM3886 based amp, I found a lot of people asking about doing one P2P... the general concensus was don't do it, it is too difficult. That just motivated me to do it 😉 It was also the fastest project I've ever undertaken and a success.

So I guess what interests me is

5. Something that no one else is doing.

Tony.
 
For me as someone who only been doing DIY audio stuff for a few years, I am looking for an improvement in performance over my previous builds. I did start out simple and with each subsequent project have been successful in this quest so far. I don't need to do the designing (not my field of expertise), and I'm not adverse to kits, the performance improvement (subjective I know) is what I'm interested in.

PJN
 
Status
Not open for further replies.