Is there anyone who ever experiemented with planar/lighthouse/disk triodes like 2C43, 2C39, EC157 etc? These are coaxial built GHz devices, with quite impressive linearity, amplification factor and other goodies. General issue is the socket which is usually exotic and would need to be handcrafted in most cases.
Curious, I saw one phono preamp article somewhere using this type of tube but can't find that anymore.
Leonard
Curious, I saw one phono preamp article somewhere using this type of tube but can't find that anymore.
Leonard
I've used them in transmitters back in my ham days, but not in audio. Let's take the 2C43 as an example. Dissipation is 12W, so it's in a similar class with EL84. But the 2C43 is made for pulsed Class C service, so its linearity at low currents is pretty poor- its grid has to be driven positive to get into the more linear region. But then, the grid current is nearly as high as the plate current, requiring high drive power (a few watts) for a pretty mediocre output power (maybe 9-10 watts). If you drive it harder, you'll kill the tube- it's meant to run higher currents at a very low duty cycle, characteristic of Class C. So as an audio tube with a high duty cycle, you end up being stuck in the non-linear parts of the tube curves.
2C39 has similar issues, just at higher plate dissipation- because of the duty cycles, it can't be driven into the nice linear region of operation without killing it. The curves get more evenly spaced at 300 mA, but the max current is 125 mA, unless the duty cycle is really, really low. At 100mA, it looks like a variable mu triode, quite nonlinear.
That could certainly work- maybe running it at 7-8 mA, 150V on the plate. The low swing required will mean that the tube's mediocre linearity won't be as important. Transconductance is good, maybe 1/3 of a D3a, half of a 6AQ4. You'll get less Miller capacitance with the 7077, but at the cost of poorer linearity. It looks much cooler, though, and it's hard to put a value on that.
edit: Actually, about the same gm as a 6AQ4, not half.
edit: Actually, about the same gm as a 6AQ4, not half.
Interestingly, G.E. developed a small planar triode for audio that had nearly identical parameters as the type 45. It never went into production. If you are interested in measuring the 7077 for distortion, I have a pair with sockets I'll send to you. They were pulled from FAA direction-finding equipment and I have no use for them.
John
John
3cx300
3CX300 is a mu~=7 planar triode adapted for audio use.
300W dissipation, if you use forced air cooling, gets you up in the linear part of the curves.
It's rated for 30W using convection cooling (not sure how they do this as Eimac insists on cooling air for their metal tubes even if only the heater is powered)
Also the 3CX400 (8874) is a high-mu planar triode that would work for audio in a local feedback circuit ala Schade.
3CX300 is a mu~=7 planar triode adapted for audio use.
300W dissipation, if you use forced air cooling, gets you up in the linear part of the curves.
It's rated for 30W using convection cooling (not sure how they do this as Eimac insists on cooling air for their metal tubes even if only the heater is powered)
Also the 3CX400 (8874) is a high-mu planar triode that would work for audio in a local feedback circuit ala Schade.
Attachments
Last edited:
A possible snag with these valves is that they are designed to amplify at UHF and microwave frequencies. This means that for stability you may have to build to this level of sophistication, as the valve doesn't know you only want it to amplify audio. Just slapping on a grid stopper might not be sufficient. A bit too much inductance in the cathode lead, and you have a Hartley oscillator!
If you know how to use these for their intended purpose, then you could probably use them successfully for audio too. It does seem a bit of a waste, though! Why not get an amateur licence and build a transmitter?
If you know how to use these for their intended purpose, then you could probably use them successfully for audio too. It does seem a bit of a waste, though! Why not get an amateur licence and build a transmitter?
True, these tubes are meant to be applied as a system, consisting of the tube itself, the socket, the ground plane, airflow, and some simple wiring practices that are good for any high-gm low capacitance tube. The ones I called out are good to about 250 MHz in normal service.
Why use the 4CX250 et al?
Relatively inexpensive -- the 4X150 is about $20 NOS plus about $30 for the socket. Long life if well cooled.
Great gm for use in local feedback circuits.
Nice gm curve for AB crossover.
Modest heater power, 6V/2.6A (less than a 6KD6 sweep tube).
Easy to drive; no grid current, modest drive voltage due to high gm.
They enable 200-300 WPC power amp with 2 output tubes per channel.
The drawbacks - high anode voltage (900V or more) needed to get good power efficiency due to high Vak(min), cooling air, preheat timer needed.
I did, but I made it with sand! The 4CX250's, sockets and chimneys are still in the box. I may experiment with them at 220 or 432 MHz someday since that is about the only frequency were surplus sand isn't cheap.
Sweep tubes work well a high current and handle monster transients with ease due to the large cathode and hig peak current capability. This means that a 250 watt amp will work with 650 volts on the plate and a 2500 ohm OPT.
The 4CX250 can be used to make a 250 watt amp, but you need 1000 volts on the plate and there is no reserve peak current capability for transients. The tubes are at the maximum current spec at max power. Excessive current even for a short period of time kills Eimac tubes.
Here is planar triode based phono stage that I have seen and heard, the design discussed was designed and built by an old friend of mine:
416 Triode Phono
Actually I have seen and heard both the original MKI and the MKII..
Based on WE 416B planar triodes it sounds very good, and is also extremely quiet.. Obviously there is a lot of gain in that first stage and rp is not that high helping with the overall noise performance of the design.
416 Triode Phono
Actually I have seen and heard both the original MKI and the MKII..
Based on WE 416B planar triodes it sounds very good, and is also extremely quiet.. Obviously there is a lot of gain in that first stage and rp is not that high helping with the overall noise performance of the design.
Last edited:
even if I never understood overall agenda of site :
ansaht.altervista.org :: Leggi argomento - Places and Legends __ Luoghi e Leggende
ansaht.altervista.org :: Leggi argomento - Places and Legends __ Luoghi e Leggende
not quite sure what you mean... most high mu tubes have low gm, this is very high in both....Mi = S x Ri
and question is ?
Mu = amplification factor
S= 1/gm = mA/V
Ri= internal tube impedance
taking in account that Mu = S x Ri
.....basically - your question was :
what means :
"is there any tube with lower internal impedance ..... "
thinking about any tube - taking in account just one of 3 main factors is ....... not complete ;
what you really mean - what factor of these 3 is major one for your purpose ?
S= 1/gm = mA/V
Ri= internal tube impedance
taking in account that Mu = S x Ri
.....basically - your question was :
what means :
"is there any tube with lower internal impedance ..... "
thinking about any tube - taking in account just one of 3 main factors is ....... not complete ;
what you really mean - what factor of these 3 is major one for your purpose ?
I spent some time reading that thread, very interesting, and rather bizarre..
Have no idea what it is really about.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.