I set the rules for .050'' traces and .050" spacing on my vacuum tube PCB's. I generally leave as much extra spacing as available around the plate pins on output tubes since the voltage on the plate can reach 1 KV in normal operation. It can see 2 to 3 KV (actual measured values) on a P-P guitar amp cranked full tilt into a guitar speaker near its resonant frequency.
I will also make heater traces thicker if the current is higher than 600 mA.
I will also make heater traces thicker if the current is higher than 600 mA.
I generally use 2.5 - 3.0mm up to 400V or so.. (I'm conservative)
Yeah even I feel the same its safe.
I had issue recently on a PCB with 430VDC. I could not explain why I had distorsion and resorted with using an old board with success. So my new board was defective.
I had a 0.8mm trace clearance. Not enough. I re-ran the PCB with a 1.5mm clearance and did a new batch. All good this time.
Since then, I always clear 1.5mm with high voltage tracks.
I had a 0.8mm trace clearance. Not enough. I re-ran the PCB with a 1.5mm clearance and did a new batch. All good this time.
Since then, I always clear 1.5mm with high voltage tracks.
I had a 0.8mm trace clearance. Not enough.
Trace clearance (0.8 mm) as such can not be a reason for distortion, compared to 1.5 mm.
When I last read up on this, there were a few mentions that the IPC standard for normal FR-4 basically works out at very close to 0.001"/10V so I tend to use that as a rule of thumb 🙂
That would be 1,14 mm for 450 V. Looks quite sensible measure.
But the case is fully separate if the pcb is home made (= no solder mask) or factory made with the mask.
The latter is far more "safe".
But the case is fully separate if the pcb is home made (= no solder mask) or factory made with the mask.
The latter is far more "safe".
Trace clearance (0.8 mm) as such can not be a reason for distortion.....But the case is fully separate if the pcb is home made (= no solder mask) or factory made with the mask.
I spent several days chasing a weird issue on a home made board, I finally came to believe that it was the fault of the board itself, and I made another identical board. It was OK.
Discussions, and testing with one of the materials experts at work revealed minute leakage currents in the PCB itself. He explained the two main reasons this could have happened. We believed that both came into play here.
Some budget G-10 material (similar to FR-4, but not Flame Retardant) can be hygroscopic (absorbs moisture from the air) given the average humidity in south Florida is in the 90% range for most of the year, a likely possibility.
The same moisture absorbing properties could have caused some of the etchant (with copper in solution) to be absorbed into the board.
I have added an acetone wash to my process which should help take the surface moisture out.
The same materials guy took one look at my blown head gasket and told me that I had never changed my car's coolant. He was right. The old predominately iron car engines didn't care. A modern engine is made of iron, aluminum, magnesium, copper and others. With old fluid the cooling system becomes a battery and the copper ring in the head gasket gets eaten! "Galvanic corrosion"
Creepage calculator treat Vdc equal to Vrms.
450 Vdc = 450 Vpeak, but in case of sine 450 Vrms is 637 Vpeak.
Is this a contradiction? 1.3 mm clearance is recommended for both.
450 Vdc = 450 Vpeak, but in case of sine 450 Vrms is 637 Vpeak.
Is this a contradiction? 1.3 mm clearance is recommended for both.
@Tubelab_com
Very interesting, are some papers about this phenomenon existing?
In this case, all printed board assemblies needs to be coated by manufacturer then it´s become a real safety issue.
One method to reduce safetly creepage is to go multilayer and put high voltage in inner layer: FR4 is good isolator (roughtly 1mm/10kV) and no inner layer air cavities after manufacturing process. I´ve use this process in PCB´s for nuclear power plant.
Don´t forget creepage on PCB is equal to air gap!
JP
Very interesting, are some papers about this phenomenon existing?
In this case, all printed board assemblies needs to be coated by manufacturer then it´s become a real safety issue.
One method to reduce safetly creepage is to go multilayer and put high voltage in inner layer: FR4 is good isolator (roughtly 1mm/10kV) and no inner layer air cavities after manufacturing process. I´ve use this process in PCB´s for nuclear power plant.
Don´t forget creepage on PCB is equal to air gap!
JP
Don´t forget creepage on PCB is equal to air gap!
Even if it is coated with solder mask ?
If I´m remerbering, solder mask dielectric strength = 70V?
Another way to increase creepage on PCB is using milled slots, but air gap remains the same: usefull to separe traces or copper planes
JP
Another way to increase creepage on PCB is using milled slots, but air gap remains the same: usefull to separe traces or copper planes
JP
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Tubes / Valves
- PCB Trace clearance for the Tube circuits