yeah, so gate (left) and drain (mid) go to the resistor and source (right) goes to ground. I really don't see how my wiring is wrong.
if your red croc wire is having some resistance (bad/coroded contact), that's it
tie gate directly to drain with short croc
connect DVM probes directly to mosfet
tie gate directly to drain with short croc
connect DVM probes directly to mosfet
well, that looks better! thanks a lot!!

I will create a 3-pin screw terminal directly soldered to the probe wires, in which I can screw in the mosfets (after all, I have close to 100 to test...), it might be even better.
so now, basically, I should lower Vcc until I have Iq=0,170A, and then I match the devices by the Vgs displayed? That means, all devices will have different Vcc, whereas in the real circuit, they will be fed by the exact same Vcc rail. Doesn't it matter?

I will create a 3-pin screw terminal directly soldered to the probe wires, in which I can screw in the mosfets (after all, I have close to 100 to test...), it might be even better.
so now, basically, I should lower Vcc until I have Iq=0,170A, and then I match the devices by the Vgs displayed? That means, all devices will have different Vcc, whereas in the real circuit, they will be fed by the exact same Vcc rail. Doesn't it matter?
adjust Vcc by first one - to get in desired Iq range (with your resistor group), then measure them all without altering Vcc
works perfectly well! thanks for the hints!! One question, though: as we will be operating the devices at a higher current (200+ mA), why don't we crank up the Iq for the matching procedure as well?
Crank it up to the intended Iq, no reason whatsoever to not do that. And also, consider a second measurement of all devices with a higher Iq, for example 350-400mA. That will enable you to get an indicator of transconductance too 🙂
No, but you know, sometimes my Viking spunk forces me into maxing bias beyond safe levels. So, one measurement for stock Iq, and one to ensure good matching when going frying pan loco, is always good. And hurts much less than a spindle up my butt. And avoids screaming 

The Schematic Zen Mod is great. I noticed heatsinks for the mosfets under test. How long do you test them for?
Here is a link that can come in handy:
https://sites.google.com/bucknell.edu/ericshometheater/erics-home-theater/aleph-x-clone-amps
Press Control + F and enter: "Matching Mosfets" and note that there are instructions for TO-220 mosfets and TO-247
Here is another site:
http://www.diamondstar.de/transistor_matching_mosfet.html
Also, a little indepenant research. When I first started matching mosfets, I matched some IRFP9240's with the circuit you would use for a IRF9610. I matched a whole set of around 100. About a month later, I realized my mistake. So I lined up all the mosfets from lowest to highest. I then set up a new circuit with a higher voltage, resistance to hit the appropriate IQ. I tested each for 45 seconds a piece. Just long enough to get them pretty warm. Only a few mosfets changed their locations maybe one place lower or higher with the new testing. Technically they would have been well within tolerence. Also, that could have been a slight error in my testing.
Here is a link that can come in handy:
https://sites.google.com/bucknell.edu/ericshometheater/erics-home-theater/aleph-x-clone-amps
Press Control + F and enter: "Matching Mosfets" and note that there are instructions for TO-220 mosfets and TO-247
Here is another site:
http://www.diamondstar.de/transistor_matching_mosfet.html
Also, a little indepenant research. When I first started matching mosfets, I matched some IRFP9240's with the circuit you would use for a IRF9610. I matched a whole set of around 100. About a month later, I realized my mistake. So I lined up all the mosfets from lowest to highest. I then set up a new circuit with a higher voltage, resistance to hit the appropriate IQ. I tested each for 45 seconds a piece. Just long enough to get them pretty warm. Only a few mosfets changed their locations maybe one place lower or higher with the new testing. Technically they would have been well within tolerence. Also, that could have been a slight error in my testing.
No, but you know
I believe repetitive results around (here) are saying that mosfets (plain vanilla IRFP, made in millions, so why bother faking) matched at sub-A current, are pretty well matched at above-A current
edit: Mike sez the same
Is see. So probably irrelevant. I may have overdone it then. But I swore never to solder in poor matches after my run-in with two bad sets from the store a few years back. Practically, I just changed the lab PSUs voltage after the initial measurement @ stock Iq to see if they were consistent or not. All were. But even though it from an objective standpoint made no difference, it reassured me. At the time I needed that. ❤️ 🏳️🌈
what you do is good enough to make for some very tightly matched sets for my F4 monsterblocks. Good times!They don't get warm, and I run them for ~10 sec. So no heatsinks. You'll see the Vgs settle by 10 seconds. I mark the Vgs reading on the MOSFET with a fine tip sharpie and set them aside. Sort the batch by VGS when you've measured them and group them together.
I make sure they are all temperature stable for the matching session. Translation: if they are delivered on a cold winter day or hot summer day, I let them set inside in my temperature-controlled home for a day or so before I begin matching. Simple.
Ones I have to match/measure 350 mosfets irfp240/9240. I learned hard way that there is something called tempco.
Repeted measurement was always different.
Then I used relative measurement, Dut Vgs compared to reference mosfet Vgs.
Dut and reference mosfet are clamped to same heatsink in close proximity.
Repeted measurement was always different.
Then I used relative measurement, Dut Vgs compared to reference mosfet Vgs.
Dut and reference mosfet are clamped to same heatsink in close proximity.
If I match different batches of fets on different days, I retest the ones I want to use before I install them in an amp. My jig is easy to setup. Also, my handwriting is barely legible so.... I need to confirm what I am reading is actually what I wrote. 😬 I haven't noticed any issues so far.
I finished measuring my 96 Mosfets. I tested them at 170mA, and the Ugs ranges from 3,81 to 3,97 V.
I then myde another run and tested some of them at 2A. There were perfectly matched at this higher current, meaning that the Mosfets that had the same Ugs at 170mA had no discrepancies at 2A.
So that's great. 🙂
I then myde another run and tested some of them at 2A. There were perfectly matched at this higher current, meaning that the Mosfets that had the same Ugs at 170mA had no discrepancies at 2A.
So that's great. 🙂
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Pass Labs
- Pass Mosfet Matching Help