I suppose That’s why the bottom end is so ‘overdamped’ if not careful?
Look in the TOOLS submenu of ‘diaphragm displacement’ in horn response at the diaphragm pressure in either side of the cone or when ‘both’ resonators are engaged around 3xFb
Look in the TOOLS submenu of ‘diaphragm displacement’ in horn response at the diaphragm pressure in either side of the cone or when ‘both’ resonators are engaged around 3xFb
Like always 'simulations' of power handling, x-max and pressure is different in the real world, sims are very static. Real world is dynamic just like the music it will play.
I’d rather add the air mass of the shorter resonator(red graph) than be stuck with the green graph (basically a tapped horn/pipe ) and its issues (by comparison in the group delay and impulse stuff)
But it’s all pretty ‘over damped’ compared to what could be created by a pair of big vented reflex boxes instead with the same drivers?
Or the ‘advantages ‘ start slipping away 🤷🏼 once you compare and contrast ‘everything’
But it’s all pretty ‘over damped’ compared to what could be created by a pair of big vented reflex boxes instead with the same drivers?
Or the ‘advantages ‘ start slipping away 🤷🏼 once you compare and contrast ‘everything’
Attachments
Last edited: