cartman said:
Hi,
Because exact jitter spec is lacking, I'd be carefull in judging the spec. In addition, the simple interface between 8412 and 1541 would have my preference
If you want true low jitter, a secondary PLL with VCXO is required. Obviously pin 2 ban 4 of the 1541 should be clocked directly from the VCXO.
best
cartman said:
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&client=safari&rls=en&q=tda1541+cs8412+non+oversampling&spell=1
added opa627
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&...41+cs8412+non+oversampling+opa627&btnG=Search
must be enough to save your weekend
Just across the border, a bit to the South, Pedja Rogic has excellent DAC and reclocker boards. They are worth taking the road trip yourself (5-6 hours?).
http://users.verat.net/~pedjarogic/audio/tda1541a_dac/tda1541a_dac_rev.htm
Cheers,
Extreme_Boky
http://users.verat.net/~pedjarogic/audio/tda1541a_dac/tda1541a_dac_rev.htm
Cheers,
Extreme_Boky
Mine is with TDA1541A S1 and reclocker board. The sound is very good, and with a proper transport it comes very close to good analog set-up (turntable). It sounds unprocessed compared with other digital sources and serves me very well as a reference DAC when doing modifications. I got DAC and reclocker boards from Pedja, other parts form suppliers around the World.
Cheers,
Extreme_Boky
Cheers,
Extreme_Boky
On Pedjas' site he discusses many of his design choices which is educational in itself as well as answering yours question.
http://tinyurl.com/9wtnt
"There is no substitution for AD844 here! AD844 is topologically the opamp but is not used here as the opamp"
http://tinyurl.com/9wtnt
"There is no substitution for AD844 here! AD844 is topologically the opamp but is not used here as the opamp"
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.