• WARNING: Tube/Valve amplifiers use potentially LETHAL HIGH VOLTAGES.
    Building, troubleshooting and testing of these amplifiers should only be
    performed by someone who is thoroughly familiar with
    the safety precautions around high voltages.

New Tim Mellows OTL project

Last night piks, 2sk117 ccs was working good, this is what LTP out looks like at 10K
 

Attachments

  • ccs2 10k.png
    ccs2 10k.png
    9.6 KB · Views: 295
This is what I get with 3 separated PSU+ccs at 8 ohms dummy load.
Captures are: 1k/2w; 10Hz/2w; 10k/2w; 10Hz-60K at 1dB/div 2w
 

Attachments

  • 1k2w.png
    1k2w.png
    8.7 KB · Views: 269
  • 1k2wsq.png
    1k2wsq.png
    7.8 KB · Views: 268
  • 10h2w.png
    10h2w.png
    8.9 KB · Views: 268
  • 10h2wsq.png
    10h2wsq.png
    8.1 KB · Views: 267
  • 10k2w.png
    10k2w.png
    8.7 KB · Views: 54
  • 10k2wsq.png
    10k2wsq.png
    8.2 KB · Views: 55
  • bode2w.png
    bode2w.png
    9.7 KB · Views: 57
Last edited:
Disabled Account
Joined 2013
Attached is sim of possible bias, HT voltage and current variation under heavy load and idle condition. In my own amp the PSU dropped from 170V to 140V at full power both channel on. The bias drop from -58 to -51, about 20W each. DC offset is not a problem at full load.
 

Attachments

  • psu otl power variation test.png
    psu otl power variation test.png
    429.6 KB · Views: 158
Disabled Account
Joined 2013
I'm trying to remember my tube theory and wondering if the 6C33Cs here are operating in Class A push pull, Class B or Class AB.

@about -50V bias
Class A 0-100mW
Class AB 100mW & above
@20W it's approaching pure Class B. But if you bias @-80V, it'll be Class AB to B nearly all the way with very tiny Class A portion, maybe under 1mW.
 
Last edited:
Disabled Account
Joined 2013
But in my case, as I intend 32 ohms, shell I rich class A ? What bias shall be?

Yes, as you will get higher output voltage with same amount of current in Class A, as the power (V*V/32) is more when load is 32 ohms, est about 0.5W, See attached, 4*4/32=0.5W. Of course as waveform shown some asymmetry, if in actual Class A it would have 10% distortion, we can't really define a clear line when it's going Class AB. But the higher the load, the larger Class A portion will be I agreed. I don't think lowering the bias will help much due to heat, unless you can handle it. If you bias -35V, the current is about 500mA(Dissp=75W), you get 1W Class A into 32 ohms. Maybe you can try -40 to -45V.

Edit: You maybe able to increase Class A portion if you increase the cathode res. of 6C33c, say 3-5 ohms, maybe 3-4W into 32 ohms.
 

Attachments

  • Class A 32 ohms load.png
    Class A 32 ohms load.png
    180 KB · Views: 243
Last edited:
Yes, as you will get higher output voltage with same amount of current in Class A, as the power (V*V/32) is more when load is 32 ohms, est about 0.5W, See attached, 4*4/32=0.5W. Of course as waveform shown some asymmetry, if in actual Class A it would have 10% distortion, we can't really define a clear line when it's going Class AB. But the higher the load, the larger Class A portion will be I agreed. I don't think lowering the bias will help much due to heat, unless you can handle it. If you bias -35V, the current is about 500mA(Dissp=75W), you get 1W Class A into 32 ohms. Maybe you can try -40 to -45V.

You are right, thanks. I wonder if I'll get better sound in reality. For now I have to fix several steps till the moment when I'll swich the esl 63 on 32 ohms. I am still listening diffrent kind of ecc83 and ef86......the best sounding ecc83 were Philips Miniwatt and ef86 mullard, but I shall try some Telefunken to compleat that test.
 
Disabled Account
Joined 2013
You are right, thanks. I wonder if I'll get better sound in reality. For now I have to fix several steps till the moment when I'll swich the esl 63 on 32 ohms. I am still listening diffrent kind of ecc83 and ef86......the best sounding ecc83 were Philips Miniwatt and ef86 mullard, but I shall try some Telefunken to compleat that test.

You'll hear the sound becomes thicker and warmer. But you may get the same effect if you increase the current of ecc83 of 1st LTP, say from current 0.5mA to 1mA, I definitely hear the difference. If you adjust 1st LTP, you need to adjust 2nd LTP to re-bias correctly, not a big issue.
 
Last edited:
You'll hear the sound becomes thicker and warmer. But you may get the same effect if you increase the current of ecc83 of 1st LPT, say from current 0.5mA to 1mA, I definely hear the difference. If you adjust 1st LPT, you need to adjust 2nd LPT to re-bias correctly, not a big issue.

Interesting, I shall try this.
By the way, Your sim program can simulate the behaviour of my esl 63 especialy around the primary of the input transformers? see the attech
In case trafo specs are needed, Rprim =0,65 ohms and L= 360 mH
 

Attachments

  • quad esl63.jpg
    quad esl63.jpg
    423.4 KB · Views: 245
  • quad esl63 32 ohms.jpg
    quad esl63 32 ohms.jpg
    424.2 KB · Views: 237
Last edited:
Disabled Account
Joined 2013
Interesting, I shall try this.
By the way, Your sim program can simulate the behaviour of my esl 63 especialy around the primary of the input transformers? see the attech
In case trafo specs are needed, Rprim =0,65 ohms and L= 360 mH

LTSpice use inductance for transformer simulation. So Lpri=360mH, Lsec will have to be calculated from impedance ratio or inductance ratio. So I assume L14 and L15 both are same, 8 ohms to 2k transformer, and so Lsec inductance is 90H (0.36*2000/8), is it correct?

Edit: sorry 16 to 2K transformer. I recalculated as 45H
 
Last edited:
LTSpice use inductance for transformer simulation. So Lpri=360mH, Lsec will have to be calculated from impedance ratio or inductance ratio. So I assume L14 and L15 both are same, 8 ohms to 2k transformer, and so Lsec inductance is 90H (0.36*2000/8), is it correct?

I'll chek latter all again and I shall be back with .
All I know for shure about the trafos is the prim/sec ratio 1/125 and the Resistence of each one 0,65 Ohms. I have to chek inductance again as I am not shure if 360mH was with sec shorted or not. L14 and L15 are the same but 8 ohms are achived with paralel linked so I asume each of them has 16 ohms.
 

Attachments

  • Bucureşti-20151012-00447.jpg
    Bucureşti-20151012-00447.jpg
    540.4 KB · Views: 133
  • quad esl 63 trafo.jpg
    quad esl 63 trafo.jpg
    702.9 KB · Views: 124
  • 20150918_151807.jpg
    20150918_151807.jpg
    535.1 KB · Views: 137
Disabled Account
Joined 2013
I'll chek latter all again and I shall be back with .
All I know for shure about the trafos is the prim/sec ratio 1/125 and the Resistence of each one 0,65 Ohms. I have to chek inductance again as I am not shure if 360mH was with sec shorted or not. L14 and L15 are the same but 8 ohms are achived with paralel linked so I asume each of them has 16 ohms.

If the turn ratio is 125 and Lsec is 0.36, then the impedance ratio =125*125=15625, and Lpri=15625*0.36=5625H or Pri/Sec=250K/16 (250K/16=15625). You can get 6.5kV at full power with input of 2V-p.

I can sim another if you confirm the actual value.
 

Attachments

  • OTL 32 ohms to ESL transformer-1.png
    OTL 32 ohms to ESL transformer-1.png
    229.9 KB · Views: 137
Last edited:
If the turn ratio is 125 and Lsec is 0.36, then the impedance ratio =125*125=15625, and Lpri=15625*0.36=5625H or Pri/Sec=250K/16 (250K/16=15625). You can get 6.5kV at full power with input of 2V-p.

I can sim another if you confirm the actual value.

I have allready compleat measuring with digital bridge.
Prim is 0,5 ohms 36 mH 46 winds
Sec is 3,1L 450 H 5600 winds (26pF)
Can you trace 10hz -100Khz at 2w and full power 8 & 32 ohms ?
Also has to be counted the esl imput network R15/C25 and R1, R2