I give a lot away, but some of them get rebuilt into other things. I don't have as much time as I used to these days so I've slowed down a great deal.
Yes, the Meanwell S-25-12 datasheet states hiccup mode for overload protection, which exactly turns out as the behaviour you've observed. It's also an effective slow start for the heaters, btw.
Best regards!
Best regards!
I don't like these type of sockets. But since I had to get 16. I figured it would be ok this time.View attachment 1156505
beautiful work Bas:
You have some bigness going on there, it covers a fair bit of shelf space with all those 6p1p tubes. Do they need to be matched in any way?
Could you post a circuit diagram when you get a chance.
You have some bigness going on there, it covers a fair bit of shelf space with all those 6p1p tubes. Do they need to be matched in any way?
Could you post a circuit diagram when you get a chance.
Here is the original thread with the “Stupendous” schematic by @kodabmx
https://www.diyaudio.com/community/threads/the-stupendous-6p1p-4pp-amplifier.317395/
Bas’ deviations from thie schematic are in #63.
Matching Is not needed since each output tube is independently biased.
https://www.diyaudio.com/community/threads/the-stupendous-6p1p-4pp-amplifier.317395/
Bas’ deviations from thie schematic are in #63.
Matching Is not needed since each output tube is independently biased.
That said, some matching is probably still desirable.Matching Is not needed since each output tube is independently biased.
This is the general idea. The output transformer is replaced by a choke. (In my case I'll use little guitar output transformer primary as choke). The exo-173 is not made for dc. Hence a "parafeed" capacitor.
My rset for the lm317 is 33 ohm so the current through each tube is around 39mA. Got this advice from kodabmx because my output transformer is the Lundahl LL1620 (3.3k)
This is the pp part for clarity. From kodabmx's doc (attached)
Attachments
Last edited by a moderator:
@kodabmx why do you use the triode-strapped pentode for voltage amp and the triode for splitter instead of the other way around? I know it works very well, but is there a specific reason? The pentode section can handle bigger power, would not that be better for driving output tubes?
I started it this way... It may or may not make a difference.
Originally, it was set up as pentode input but I didn't need the gain, and I found it was easy to make an oscillator by accident so I strapped it.
In my modular amp, the 6F12P triode drives 6N8S (6SN7) drivers for the outputs anyway... I even replaced 330R with 1.9Vf LED in some of them 🙂

Originally, it was set up as pentode input but I didn't need the gain, and I found it was easy to make an oscillator by accident so I strapped it.
In my modular amp, the 6F12P triode drives 6N8S (6SN7) drivers for the outputs anyway... I even replaced 330R with 1.9Vf LED in some of them 🙂

Makes sense, especially if it started as a pentode. And tbh the 6F12P is a weird tube, the triode is very powerful (3.5W, big currents) and with u of 100, like 5 12AX7 in parallel. I have not been able to find a western equivalent.
@jcalvarez is there a double triode tube with mu=100 but at least twice as powerful as the 12AX7? First option is parallel both section, but I’m curious to know if there’s another solution.
Thanks!
Thanks!
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Tubes / Valves
- My "Stupendous" PPP 6P1P build