ggerla,
You are on a good track with your project now. 🙂
In order to improve the accuracy of your simulation I suggest to update your zma files. The original files from post #11 are a bit off IMO and may lead to deviations that are unnecessary. Attached is a zip containing my impedance files.
Regarding coils I would go for 0.8 mm (20 AWG) air core in the woofer section. They are cheaper, don't cause distortions and the higher DCR actually does improve the bass response in a closed box (on the expense of sensitivity, of course). In the tweeter section 0.7 mm air core usually is fine.
You are on a good track with your project now. 🙂
In order to improve the accuracy of your simulation I suggest to update your zma files. The original files from post #11 are a bit off IMO and may lead to deviations that are unnecessary. Attached is a zip containing my impedance files.
Regarding coils I would go for 0.8 mm (20 AWG) air core in the woofer section. They are cheaper, don't cause distortions and the higher DCR actually does improve the bass response in a closed box (on the expense of sensitivity, of course). In the tweeter section 0.7 mm air core usually is fine.
Attachments
ggerla,
You are on a good track with your project now. 🙂
In order to improve the accuracy of your simulation I suggest to update your zma files. The original files from post #11 are a bit off IMO and may lead to deviations that are unnecessary. Attached is a zip containing my impedance files.
Regarding coils I would go for 0.8 mm (20 AWG) air core in the woofer section. They are cheaper, don't cause distortions and the higher DCR actually does improve the bass response in a closed box (on the expense of sensitivity, of course). In the tweeter section 0.7 mm air core usually is fine.
Thanks Dissi.
I used your files to make some other simulation and confirm my choise.
About your coil suggestions I tried to use air coil but they are more expansive and reduce too much SPL. I think that i will use iron core.
I'm not very happy with the low frequency response, but I think that with this budget I could not do better than this...
Poor crossover
Hi all
sorry if I come back on this thtread but I found a crossover configuration that allow me to save 30€.
In attach you can find schematic, spl and impedence.
What do you think about this solution?
Hi all
sorry if I come back on this thtread but I found a crossover configuration that allow me to save 30€.
In attach you can find schematic, spl and impedence.
What do you think about this solution?
Attachments
Work in progress...
Yesterday I start to build my project.
In attach some photos.
Because I have no clamps I'm using screws... with some problem (split in lateral wall), but I have not wanted to buy clamps only to build speakers.
regards
Yesterday I start to build my project.
In attach some photos.
Because I have no clamps I'm using screws... with some problem (split in lateral wall), but I have not wanted to buy clamps only to build speakers.
regards
Attachments
🙂
What about using box ported, is there who can help design the cabinet and crossover?
Hi all
sorry if I come back on this thtread but I found a crossover configuration that allow me to save 30€.
In attach you can find schematic, spl and impedence.
What do you think about this solution?
What about using box ported, is there who can help design the cabinet and crossover?
Hi all
after your suggestion I make several simulation and several study.
Basing on zaph's project "The Chameleon"
SB Acoustics 2-Way Title Page
I didn't understand why zaph's response is more smooth. I have some ripple between 200Hz and 1kHz. I think that I'm not able to do better.
What do you think about this project?
Just an FYI- The 'Chameleons' were not a project zaph built, just one that he hosted for another builder. IIRC, that project was done by Dave Ralph (dlr).
Later,
Wolf
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Multi-Way
- My personal 2 way project