I have been offered one, but I read it uses obsolete "Dr T" power transistors ? :/
How good should this unit be and is what I mentioned a "no-go" ?
Musical Fidelity The Preamp/Dr Thomas - Vintage - Pre/power amplifiers
Thanks !
How good should this unit be and is what I mentioned a "no-go" ?
Musical Fidelity The Preamp/Dr Thomas - Vintage - Pre/power amplifiers
Thanks !
I have been offered one, but I read it uses obsolete "Dr T" power transistors ? :/
How good should this unit be and is what I mentioned a "no-go" ?
Since it can't be maintained, it should cost just a fraction of the original price, and then only if it works properly.
Last edited:
The unobtainable transistors are in the DrT power amp, not the preamp. Searching on this forum suggests hitachi devices.
Should be. It's hair shirt hifi at it's best, but never seen or heard one. Might not like CD line level as from the Pre-CD era but was well regarded at the time. Really depends how much you are being asked to pay.
The preamp works well. ( I own 2 of these and the Dr T's)
There are no obsolete parts in the preamp. (Also the output devices in the Dr T can be replaced by modern lateral mosfets although they very very rarely give trouble )
The preamp was built with poor quality electrolytic capacitors. If you want good sound these will need to be replaced with low esr electrolytic capacitors. Ideally Elne Simic.
Don
There are no obsolete parts in the preamp. (Also the output devices in the Dr T can be replaced by modern lateral mosfets although they very very rarely give trouble )
The preamp was built with poor quality electrolytic capacitors. If you want good sound these will need to be replaced with low esr electrolytic capacitors. Ideally Elne Simic.
Don
I found MF amps a bit dull in the past, wonder if re-capping would have helped.
Could be a nice enclosure for a DCB1 if you don't like it, just saying 😀
Could be a nice enclosure for a DCB1 if you don't like it, just saying 😀
Been offered the preamp for 130$. I wonder if it worth it as a "nice to have". At this point I'm using a passive one.
Been offered the preamp for 130$. I wonder if it worth it as a "nice to have".
At this point I'm using a passive one.
If you can, try it out first. You may like your passive better. Do you need to get a phono stage?
Unless you need extra gain or have impedance matching issues a passive usually sounds better. Most modern sources output 2V which is more than enough to drive a domestic power amp to clipping.
I'm using the phono stage of a Nuance preamp, going to a passive volume control and then to a Quad 405, like the setup quite much but wouldn't mind improving the phono stage. Should the MF have any better phono stage ?
Does it sound exceptionally good, to keep for a 150$ ? Unfortunately I cannot really listen to it, only check that it "works".
Does it sound exceptionally good, to keep for a 150$ ? Unfortunately I cannot really listen to it, only check that it "works".
Last edited:
You could probably sell it on if you don't like it. I was advised years ago to use an active pre with Quad power amps due to their input impedance, I'd still try a passive first though.
For 130 $ worth buying if only as a piece of " hi-fi history " and if in original working order an investment .
As for using it well , if it still works for how much longer without surgery ?
And has some " enthusiast " swopped caps etc without knowing exactly what they are doing ?
I could go on with what ifs but in 1982 it was an outstanding product , it's now 2016 thats a long long life for any original electronic component.
As for using it well , if it still works for how much longer without surgery ?
And has some " enthusiast " swopped caps etc without knowing exactly what they are doing ?
I could go on with what ifs but in 1982 it was an outstanding product , it's now 2016 thats a long long life for any original electronic component.
Most active pre amps add their own 'flavour' and one from 1982 probably wont be a stellar performer. There are some good diy options on here and $130 would get you quite a long way. If you don't need gain then a DCB1 with a component kit from teabag is a good solution for the outlay, especially since your in the states.
Theres a few review/aticles on google , one from hi fi news and another from gramophone worth a read .
Sorry i did try to post links but they didn't work for some reason.
Sorry i did try to post links but they didn't work for some reason.
I do have one 405 which I really love, using a passive with it. I passed over the MF as it was in really bad shape (and had broken switches too). But I got the second 405 which I plan to restore and keep 😉
Thanks !
Thanks !
Good choice. I remember an article that said the 405 was a great amp which was compromised by poor capacitor choice. There going to be quite old anyway (unless someone changed them) so i would start there. Have fun.
I had a Dr T and the Preamp back in the day. Replacing the plodding sound of Dr T with an Adcom made a huge improvement. The Preamp though was quite good. Still working after 30 years with cleaning of the selector switch and producing respectable sound.
A good passive preamp like an LDR optical volume control blows it away. If impedance matching is an issue you could add a buffer stage to your passive.
A good passive preamp like an LDR optical volume control blows it away. If impedance matching is an issue you could add a buffer stage to your passive.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Source & Line
- Analog Line Level
- Musical Fidelity "The Preamp" - any good ?