In my opinion, this is no more and no less than a personal decision: which do you prefer? Which are you willing to pay for? Terrible, better, or best?
The oscillatory ringing waveform on the secondary with NO quieting circuitry at all, is simply terrible. Awful. The slow silicon diodes inside the GBU2510 bridge rectifier of the Power86, have terrible turn-off dI/dt and they produce ENORMOUS ringing in the secondary. The ringing is so big and so ugly that tomchr decided he wouldn't live with it.
So tomchr added a 100nF capacitor across each secondary. This reduced the amplitude of the ringing and also reduced the frequency of the ringing. My measurement of the Power86 ringing (taken on a red epoxy power86-workalike board), was presented in (post#1433) and is copied below. Ringing amplitude has been reduced to ~ 3V and ringing frequency has been reduced to ~ 90 kHz. (I don't think tomchr has published his scope photos of Power86 + AS-2222 transformer ringing; if he has, I haven't seen them.)
Some people say, "That's low enough for me. I can live with that."
Other people say, "That is indeed a welcome improvement. But we know how to improve it even more! Let's reduce the ringing amplitude from 3 volts to ZERO volts!"
It turns out to be very easy to reduce ringing amplitude to zero volts. Just replace tomchr's single-C ringing quieter, with a two-C, one-R quieter (called a CRC snubber). If you want extra, EXTRA (belt-and-suspenders) ringing reduction, install CRC snubber and also replace the terrible GBU2510 diodes, with Soft Recovery diodes. This combination does indeed reduce ringing amplitude to zero volts, shown in the picture below.
But at the bottom line it's still a human decision. What do YOU (the person connecting a power supply to some Modulus-86 amplifier boards) want? Terrible ringing? Better (smaller) ringing? Or best ringing (none whatsoever)?
Nobody disputes that the ringing is real. Nobody disputes that the ringing is easy to measure. Nobody disputes that more ringing is worse and less ringing is preferable. The only area of disagreement is: how much ringing are YOU willing to tolerate? Some people are willing to tolerate 3V peak to peak ringing. Others are not.
(Oh by the way, for those people who find that 3V ringing is acceptable to them, I would venture to ask: what is the largest magnitude of ringing amplitude which is also acceptable? 3.1V? 4V? 10V? 30V? Where's the dividing line between acceptable and unacceptable? Thanks for your reply.)
I am much more interested whether this design consideration is transformer specific? Or have you looked into a variety of transformer designs?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Don't know what your day job is. But generally gold is still used where performance and reliability takes front seat to cost, and generally inside a tightly sealed unit. Not the consumer market.
Examples? other than bond wires in chips I cannot think of any examples and I have worked on satellites.
Not trying to beat you up but, what are your opinions based on? It's been proven over and over again the human perception is easily fooled. For me it's more important to adhere to sound engineering practices and measurements, not what we want to believe.
Mike
Each opinion was based on finding dissatisfaction in the audio reproduction and tracing causes down, making changes and listening to the difference. Measurements are often not the types you see in published reports. But in my book, you have to go beyond in different ways to get to the bottom of things. Yes different people are going to have different ideas. A few days ago, I visited a Klippel workshop and talked with a student that just quit his day job to pursue his idea about room acoustics. Cannot say whether he is right or wrong, but I know there will be people willing to buy into the idea. But the fact he took the jump deserves respect.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Examples? other than bond wires in chips I cannot think of any examples and I have worked on satellites.
I have not seen the actual application, but I would guess that would be the application. I did not want to get into deeper discussion on that because it was in public area when the chat floated to wires.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
hate to tell you, but this is the 21st century and the IC industry is moving away from gold. You really do not seem to know very much.
translation: I randomly changed things to match my perception bias.
Well, I also have a few reviewers that like to nit pick, and the process does involve many aspects. Yes the nitpicking is random, but investigation is not.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The published performance graphs for the Mod-86 were done without ANY snubbing. Just transformer, rectifier and smoothing caps. The 100nF was just added in case anyone wanted it. When Tom says PSRR is high he really means it.So tomchr added a 100nF capacitor across each secondary. This reduced the amplitude of the ringing and also reduced the frequency of the ringing. My measurement of the Power86 ringing (taken on a red epoxy power86-workalike board), was presented in (post#1433) and is copied below. Ringing amplitude has been reduced to ~ 3V and ringing frequency has been reduced to ~ 90 kHz. (I don't think tomchr has published his scope photos of Power86 + AS-2222 transformer ringing; if he has, I haven't seen them.)
Some people say, "That's low enough for me. I can live with that."
For other amplifiers this may not be the case...
hate to tell you, but this is the 21st century and the IC industry is moving away from gold. You really do not seem to know very much.
That is true, IC is not my specialty, but my general perception is that they do not last as long as the good old stuff. Hey, I still have an ASUS A3500 N while my children's notebooks have broken down and changed many times. You don't want these sorts of things happening in mission critical stuff.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
oh yes correlation and causality. cheap notebooks break therefore the chance from gold bond wires was the cause.
Modulus-86: Composite amplifier achieving <0.0004 % THD+N.
Well looking at the PSSR has nothing to do with transformer snubbering.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
The published performance graphs for the Mod-86 were done without ANY snubbing. Just transformer, rectifier and smoothing caps. The 100nF was just added in case anyone wanted it. When Tom says PSRR is high he really means it.
For other amplifiers this may not be the case...
Well looking at the PSSR has nothing to do with transformer snubbering.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Last edited:
oh yes correlation and causality. cheap notebooks break therefore the chance from gold bond wires was the cause.
Cheap notebook use gold? Older notebooks seemed more reliable to me is what I was saying. So I can't see what your logic is. Newer notebooks use gold bonding and thus unreliable???
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Well looking at the PSSR has nothing to do with transformer snubbering.
You are getting more ignorant by the minute. I give in.
Well, I think when you look at how PSRR is measured and what the transformer snubbering is doing, it should be obvious to specialists like you.. You don't want the ringing in the transformer for similar reasons you don't want ringing in linear amplifiers.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Are saying skin effect causes a self capacitance effect? I thought skin effect caused an increase in resistance....
Obviously if the self capacitance effect does not critically degradation performance in you application, you can ignore skin effect.
sigh...
That was my response when I heard it as well. Obviously we feel the same [emoji3]. Yes, I did smile.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
- Home
- Vendor's Bazaar
- Modulus-86: Composite amplifier achieving <0.0004 % THD+N.