I measured 38V across the capacitors.
considering that the current Elna capacitors are 50V 85C degrees rated and they are in this amplifier for more than 10 years I can only assume that 63V 105C degrees rated capacitor is not a must (the original capacitors had the same voltage and temp ratings).
I'm genuinly trying to understand what makes the BC components a better capacitor? or why the Cornell dublier considered inferior?
Found this:
http://www.dnm.co.uk/datasheets/SNF103M1K3563B-DATA.png
is this one considered as a good alternative?
considering that the current Elna capacitors are 50V 85C degrees rated and they are in this amplifier for more than 10 years I can only assume that 63V 105C degrees rated capacitor is not a must (the original capacitors had the same voltage and temp ratings).
I'm genuinly trying to understand what makes the BC components a better capacitor? or why the Cornell dublier considered inferior?
Found this:
http://www.dnm.co.uk/datasheets/SNF103M1K3563B-DATA.png
is this one considered as a good alternative?
Last edited:
Wouldn't it be better to use 2 50K resistors to maintain the original signal level of the amplifier as with the balance pot?
Thanks