This is a really fun amp - I'm glad a Babelfish version was created. Hats off to the mighty ZM 👍🏻
as usual, I did everything I can, to maintain desired THD Spectra through entire power range and through all practical loads
but, sometimes (as you know) one's talent is outweighed with one's ambition ........
Blame Pa, as usual, for all good and for all bad

but, sometimes (as you know) one's talent is outweighed with one's ambition ........
Blame Pa, as usual, for all good and for all bad

I might actually understand why harmonic distortion 'profile' changes with load
Youngsters are used to play with LTSpice, while even substantial part of us Geezers abandoned looking at U-I graphs of parts used
if you invest some time in reading Toob books from Yore - there you'll see everything based on silly graphs and graphically based calculus
most recent musings here, I can remember, are connected to important contribution of Mr. MR - his ( evervanishing on his numerous also evervanishing web-sites) SIT Curve making apps
that's exactly base to understand why same part with one load is giving XXX Watts and YYY THD, while same part with other load is giving XX Watts and Y THD
completely naturally that you can expect change in THD SPectra too
now - remember how we all are used to take Papa's words as
in general - say that gadgets with greater amount of OLG (thus NFB substantially higher) are more immune to that sort of changes ( having more stable THD Spectra) while gadgets with lesser amount of OLG (with or without NFB) are more prone to Chameleonning ..........
ZM Omnichameleon

^ Thank you! 🙂
I still look in amazement (meaning I have no clue, but it sounds nicer to say I'm amazed) at the source resistors carefully chosen on the F6 and scratch my head.
Making transistors behave to the master's will is ... magic.
I still look in amazement (meaning I have no clue, but it sounds nicer to say I'm amazed) at the source resistors carefully chosen on the F6 and scratch my head.
Making transistors behave to the master's will is ... magic.
well, in some cases luck is what helps
practically - entire range of similar small amps I made in recent time, was practically investigation what are effects of using "same", "similar" and "not-so-similar" parts in OS
all that being possible when I stumbled (reinventing the wheel) on whatiscalled "level shifting follower stage", thus drive-biasing stage always seeing benign load
in case of Babelfish A1, difference made with use of mosfet followers in place of double bjt one, and choosing modern complementary BJT pair instead of beancounter's choice
old bjts shown in pics (post #13, 2SA1106/2SC2581) are no slouch, but tons better than TIP35/36 (shown in #7)
while TTA/TTC modern Toshiba Biguns are bingo comparing to pretty much everything else sanely priced
now, mentioning F6 - part of my fixations of late is SL OS arrangement, avoiding degeneration wherever possible
that dictates other techniques to alter THD spectra where needed ...... just observe different values of (OS) base resistors in B. A1; difference is subtle, but there is a difference; who knew that yesterday?
I certainly didn't
and that's main reason why all this is fun to me ........ luckily I've just scratched what's possible to learn , so it'll stay as that at least 100 more yrs of my life
ZM Omnicunning
practically - entire range of similar small amps I made in recent time, was practically investigation what are effects of using "same", "similar" and "not-so-similar" parts in OS
all that being possible when I stumbled (reinventing the wheel) on whatiscalled "level shifting follower stage", thus drive-biasing stage always seeing benign load
in case of Babelfish A1, difference made with use of mosfet followers in place of double bjt one, and choosing modern complementary BJT pair instead of beancounter's choice
old bjts shown in pics (post #13, 2SA1106/2SC2581) are no slouch, but tons better than TIP35/36 (shown in #7)
while TTA/TTC modern Toshiba Biguns are bingo comparing to pretty much everything else sanely priced
now, mentioning F6 - part of my fixations of late is SL OS arrangement, avoiding degeneration wherever possible
that dictates other techniques to alter THD spectra where needed ...... just observe different values of (OS) base resistors in B. A1; difference is subtle, but there is a difference; who knew that yesterday?
I certainly didn't

and that's main reason why all this is fun to me ........ luckily I've just scratched what's possible to learn , so it'll stay as that at least 100 more yrs of my life
ZM Omnicunning
Last edited:
I like the story very much, reminds me on my youth some 170 years ago 
My dream amp was the Quad 405, built it several times. I was living behind the iron curtain at the time, so the options were very limited. After the third copy I've built, I thought - I could ask. Letter sent to England... and a few weeks later I received two original Quad 405 pcb's! But that's another story.

My dream amp was the Quad 405, built it several times. I was living behind the iron curtain at the time, so the options were very limited. After the third copy I've built, I thought - I could ask. Letter sent to England... and a few weeks later I received two original Quad 405 pcb's! But that's another story.
tell us the story
in Pub..... or any of "my" threads....... as known, Off Topic is vanished category
btw. if you go to Baby DiyA and search for Quad 405 in titles, you'll find some interesting reading
anyhow, here it is: https://www.diyaudio.rs/search/?&q=...h_and_or=or&search_in=titles&sortby=relevancy
in Pub..... or any of "my" threads....... as known, Off Topic is vanished category
btw. if you go to Baby DiyA and search for Quad 405 in titles, you'll find some interesting reading
anyhow, here it is: https://www.diyaudio.rs/search/?&q=...h_and_or=or&search_in=titles&sortby=relevancy
as known, Off Topic is vanished category
what I meant, in "my" threads Off Topic is impossible - everything is On Topic ........ Life and Good Intentions

Is there a point in time when Tim stopped developing complementary transistors push-pull amplifiers? It may well be that at some point he too became aware of the physical, "objective" "reality", the audible difference between identical and, above all, non-identical components. Unfortunately, we can no longer ask him about this)-;
I'm under the impression that, when left alone, Tim de Paravicini (RIP), wouldn't have anything to do with sand, unless he needed the money.Is there a point in time when Tim stopped developing complementary transistors push-pull amplifiers?...
So the answer is 1977: EAR.
However, whatever Tim de P. did, he did in his own grandiose way
Attitude, not BS

Attitude, not BS

- Home
- Amplifiers
- Pass Labs
- MF A1, Kudos to Tim de Paravicini, Ode to my Youth, Babelfishing