Just need to glue the 2 pieces together, and I can do some measurements.
I went with 8.5" holes - about 1/3 of cone area
I went with 8.5" holes - about 1/3 of cone area
Icannot thank you enough. These are allideas i was interested in. I am going to evetually join you in your experiments. Awesome!
ouch, the emerald ain't cheap !!!!!!!!!!!!
48db crossovers ?????
Full range drivers or 6db slopes please for me....................
I like the ideal of a time aligned coax, such as the Thiel scs4t (nice waterfall past 1khz) or maybe even the Vandersteen vlr
Thiel Audio SCS4T loudspeaker | Stereophile.com
Audio Research—Vandersteen—AudioQuest (Room 1) | Stereophile.com
Norman
48db crossovers ?????
Full range drivers or 6db slopes please for me....................
I like the ideal of a time aligned coax, such as the Thiel scs4t (nice waterfall past 1khz) or maybe even the Vandersteen vlr
Thiel Audio SCS4T loudspeaker | Stereophile.com
Audio Research—Vandersteen—AudioQuest (Room 1) | Stereophile.com
Norman
Would be interesting to try various shapes instead of a simple hole. imagine you carve some visually appealing form/object 😀. Then sell it expensively, because you just discovered the shape of the soun wave 😀. Just kidding. Nice work. Just go on 🙂
ouch, the emerald ain't cheap !!!!!!!!!!!!
48db crossovers ?????
Full range drivers or 6db slopes please for me...................
Norman
I don't think anyone here is interested in copying the crossover, it is more about whether the loading on the 15" drivers gives the speakers a higher output and hence better bass extension similar to Nelson's slot loaded open baffle.
Last edited:
Your project is looking good! I think the smaller area will give it mass-loading, extending the frequency response but somewhat lowering the efficiency. With two woofers a la EmeraldPhysics, it's likely to work fairly well, but depending on the cavity formed by the woofer and hole size, can exhibit partial horn-load response with a significant peak in the mid-bass. If the peak is large use a tank network to knock it out. Should sound great!it is more about whether the loading on the 15" drivers gives the speakers a higher output and hence better bass extension
What would happen if the chambers of the two woofers were made into a singular chamber with no division, but you still maintained dual ports? Would there be coupling of some sort?
Last edited:
What would happen if the chambers of the two woofers were made into a singular chamber with no division, but you still maintained dual ports? Would there be coupling of some sort?
Yes. Since the woofers are already fairly close, there is already a fair amount of coupling. Putting them both in a single mass-loaded chamber would increase that, we'd have to model it to see by how much.
The Emotiva XDA-1 arrived, so at some point in time I will compare the Sabre ESS9018 in BDP-95 vs AKM in DEQ2496 vs AD1955 in XDA-1
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Loudspeakers
- Full Range
- Melon Head's State of the "DUMB" Open Baffle Design