Melon Head's State of the "DUMB" Open Baffle Design

Status
Not open for further replies.
Another try.

Well, I've got this in-room graph, I'll post the other ones later when I figure out how. Ignore the low-freq noise below 30Hz, it's noise from the A/C unit. It was really hot here in July!
 

Attachments

  • Lambda In-Room %22Ultra-Flat%22.png
    Lambda In-Room %22Ultra-Flat%22.png
    32 KB · Views: 256
Would be interesting to try various shapes instead of a simple hole. imagine you carve some visually appealing form/object 😀. Then sell it expensively, because you just discovered the shape of the soun wave 😀. Just kidding. Nice work. Just go on 🙂
 
ouch, the emerald ain't cheap !!!!!!!!!!!!

48db crossovers ?????

Full range drivers or 6db slopes please for me...................

Norman

I don't think anyone here is interested in copying the crossover, it is more about whether the loading on the 15" drivers gives the speakers a higher output and hence better bass extension similar to Nelson's slot loaded open baffle.
 
Last edited:
it is more about whether the loading on the 15" drivers gives the speakers a higher output and hence better bass extension
Your project is looking good! I think the smaller area will give it mass-loading, extending the frequency response but somewhat lowering the efficiency. With two woofers a la EmeraldPhysics, it's likely to work fairly well, but depending on the cavity formed by the woofer and hole size, can exhibit partial horn-load response with a significant peak in the mid-bass. If the peak is large use a tank network to knock it out. Should sound great!
 
What would happen if the chambers of the two woofers were made into a singular chamber with no division, but you still maintained dual ports? Would there be coupling of some sort?

Yes. Since the woofers are already fairly close, there is already a fair amount of coupling. Putting them both in a single mass-loaded chamber would increase that, we'd have to model it to see by how much.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.