Looking for a good not expensive streamer

Somebody correct me if I'm wrong... I think that ADI DAC does not have a galvanically isolated USB XMOS section.... choosing a low-noise streamer may be wise...
Yes I think you're right, the RME ADI-2 does not include galvanic isolation, but from reading various technical posts on ASR and elsewhere, I understand that DAC developers now have other ways of mitigating noise from the USB source. This also applies to other cutting edge DAC products from Topping etc, but of course, being proprietary products, the techniques they employ are not openly discussed on DIY forums.
So it appears to me that galvanic isolation is now somewhat old-school, but the proof, as they say, is in the pudding ...

As to isolating the ADI-2, I have one of these:
USB 3.0 SuperSpeed Isolator
Sure, try a external USB isolation device, and see if you can hear any difference.
 
linuxfan: Do you have any link to the technical discussion? Thanks.
Start here
Review and Measurements of RME ADI-2 DAC | Audio Science Review (ASR) Forum
and here
RME ADI-2 FS Version 2 DAC and Headphone Amp Review | Audio Science Review (ASR) Forum

I think that Amir's measurements show that noise from USB is low, or at least the noise does not adversely affect the final analogue output of the DAC.
And you will see comments from RME and Topping along the lines of "immune to USB noise" - but they will not give you any technical hints about how they achieve this.
 
Thanks for the links, boths threads are rather long, it will take me a while 🙂

I wonder what USB noise is meant. Both devices have external power supply, the USB power is not used (I assume as there is no reason to do so with an external PSU available). Only the USB ground is shared, which opens possibility of a ground loop in the measurement but I do not know if that is what was meant. A proper measurement setup should eliminate any ground loop effect, IIUC.

I can imagine noise on the data lines but have not seen any measurement of its effect on proper async device.

Perhaps does the "immune to USB noise" mean "we do not use the USB power"? Maybe not, I really do not know.
 
I could just try it for kicks, I have an old iPad mini gathering dust.
You may know it already, but you will need the official Apple Lightning-to-USB Camera Adapter, of which there are presently two versions:
- Apple part number MD821AM/A which only supports self-powering of the i-device.
- Apple part number MK0W2AM/A which is larger, and supports external powering of the i-device.
 
Jan: the kernel contains the drivers. Actually quite a lot of presumably UAC2-compliant devices need a special quirk in the linux usb-audio driver to work properly. In windows - they need a vendor-specific driver and are not supported by the stock windows UAC2 driver out of the box (or if they are, their support has been added to the MS UAC2 driver in some later windows updates, just like to the linux driver in later kernel versions).

I am not saying your RME soundcard is not supported by the 4.4 kernel but it's a question which needs to be raised, IMO much more important than some discussion about high or low jitter or "design for audio" when you have a proper USB async device and all you need is proper driver and reliable and stable hardware from the audio-quality POW (I am not talking about software usability/GUI/user experience).

Sorry for sidetracking but since you have lots of know-how regarding Linux audio what is the appropriate setup for a linux desktop if used for measurements with REW? Seems that Alsa, Pulseaudio, Jack etc. have somewhat overlapping functionalities and some don't even seem to work with REW.
 
You may know it already, but you will need the official Apple Lightning-to-USB Camera Adapter, of which there are presently two versions:
- Apple part number MD821AM/A which only supports self-powering of the i-device.
- Apple part number MK0W2AM/A which is larger, and supports external powering of the i-device.

No I didn't know but was wondering about that. Trust Apple to find yet another way to extract money from us - € 40 for a 4" cable!

Sidetrack: the EU made it a law that all mobile devices from next year I think should mandatory have a USB-C power charging connector to cut down on the dozens of different power adaptors you now need in an average household.

Jan
 
Last edited:
Jan,
Honestly I am shocked, as smart as you are being intimidated by a raspberry pi? In the time you have spent on this post I built a roon server out of a I5 nuc I had laying about and installed 5 different versions of pi from Allo bridge, pi-4 and 3 pi-3 running dedicated dacs pi hats etc.. I have them all over the house some wired some not -on my main living room system, office system, headphones in the bedroom, speakers on the patio and hot tub, one on my tech bench. I even have one I am putting in a frog in the garden. I have several cheap android tablets laying about and use my iPhone and iPad as well. Ropiee is so easy for the end points once you figure out 1 its a piece of cake from there. Roon is great I ripped all my music and then signed up with Qubuz. Roon plays a cd I pick and then grabs something new off Qobuz loving it. Yes it could be argued it is not the most hi-end solution but to my ears it’s good enough. It has made Music fun again for me.

Bil
 
Last edited:
Bill I apologize for shocking you, I hope for a speedy recovery 😎 !

But it's not so much intimidated, I am fairly certain that I could set something up like that if I really want, but I would take much longer than you! It's just that I have several other things I want to work on, things that have been on the backburner too long like my direct drive ESL amp.
But I'd love to get together again in person at a BAF, but it won't be this year of course!

Jan
 
IMO the RPi is convenient for devices which take advantage of the RPi's digital interfaces - I2S, I2C for DAC/clock gen control, SPI or DSI for display, GPIOs for push buttons, etc. For a more involved project the Compute Module 4 offers much better integration options and onboard eMMC.

But for a USB-DAC streamer I do not see any advantage compared to headless/fanless x86 devices. E.g. a refurbished (A quality, no visual difference from a brand new piece) thin client from HP, Dell, or Fujitsu with professional case, top quality power adapter, conveniently placed connectors costs the same or less than plain RPi4 (which needs a PSU, a quality SD card, a decent case). Most thin clients come with 4GB+ SSD. I would use an mSATA SSD anytime over an SD card and the price is same.

All thin clients support suspend-to RAM sleep and wake-on-LAN, unlike RPi, allowing much faster startup. Power button press - sleep, power button press - wakeup. Absolutely no problems with weak PSUs etc.

Also software upgradability of an x86 machine with regular bios and USB boot is way easier for someone who does not want to delve into linux details.