LM3886 power supply

I frequently deploy a C+RC snubber across each transformer secondary, where Cx=Cacross is implemented as an MOV (metal oxide varistor) instead of a capacitor. The MOV (a) is about the same cost; (b) can be Quasimodo-optimized for critical damping just like a capacitor, and (c) adds an extra layer of surge protection, for free. To see one example, search the Forums for threads with "VRDN" in the title.

Will something like this work? - https://www.mouser.com/ProductDetail/Bourns/MOV-07D470K?qs=lgttKnAd%2B2DrMJUU5I413w==

I am assuming I would use two of them - one for each transformer secondary coil - those are 25V AC each.
 
Another revision of the PCB - more affordable to build. Size is 100mm by 75mm.
 

Attachments

  • sch.PNG
    sch.PNG
    30.5 KB · Views: 229
  • 3d-t.PNG
    3d-t.PNG
    53.7 KB · Views: 230
  • pcb-b.PNG
    pcb-b.PNG
    58.1 KB · Views: 165
  • pcb-t.PNG
    pcb-t.PNG
    58.8 KB · Views: 206
  • Gerber_PCB_psu-board-r3.0-sqr-or-long_2022-04-28.zip
    Gerber_PCB_psu-board-r3.0-sqr-or-long_2022-04-28.zip
    45.3 KB · Views: 106
Just finished building my LM3886 amp and used only 10,000uF per channel for the power supply filtering. Guess what, the voltage without load is 62V, but with the load, the voltage dips to 58V! It looks like adding more of the capacitance is essential.
 
Could you do an add with the CRC and fuse holders? It wouldn't go amiss...

Here is the thread where I simulated multiple scenarios in the LTspice. I don't think that CRC filtering is the best way to go for the power supply - https://www.diyaudio.com/community/...us-crc-filter-simulation.386838/#post-7037446

Law of diminishing returns. No resistor and four 10,000uF caps gets you variation of 1V. Add two 0.22R resistors (CRC filter) and the variation is in the range of 0.65V. Adding four 0.22R resistors (RCRC) reduces variation to 0.55V. Not worth it in my opinion.
 
Photo dump of assembled psu board:
 

Attachments

  • PXL_20220704_223620356.jpg
    PXL_20220704_223620356.jpg
    220.9 KB · Views: 161
  • PXL_20220704_223623737.jpg
    PXL_20220704_223623737.jpg
    235.9 KB · Views: 149
  • PXL_20220704_223637921.jpg
    PXL_20220704_223637921.jpg
    314.2 KB · Views: 155
  • PXL_20220704_223642925.jpg
    PXL_20220704_223642925.jpg
    268.1 KB · Views: 158
  • PXL_20220704_223608997.jpg
    PXL_20220704_223608997.jpg
    284 KB · Views: 150
  • PXL_20220704_223615395.jpg
    PXL_20220704_223615395.jpg
    244.4 KB · Views: 155
  • PXL_20220704_223629785.jpg
    PXL_20220704_223629785.jpg
    249.1 KB · Views: 148
FIXED MAJOR MISTAKE IN THE LAYOUT!!!

Pinout of the LM337 in TO-220 package is not the same as with LM317!

Pin 1 is ADJ for both LM317 and LM337

Pin 2 is IN for LM337
Pin 3 is OUT for LM337

Pin 2 is OUT for LM317
Pin 3 is IN for LM317


Attached are the schematics and gerbers with the correct layout.
 

Attachments

  • Gerber_PCB_psu-board-r7.1.zip
    Gerber_PCB_psu-board-r7.1.zip
    60.7 KB · Views: 92
  • pcb-b.PNG
    pcb-b.PNG
    112.4 KB · Views: 154
  • pcb-t.PNG
    pcb-t.PNG
    113.5 KB · Views: 153
  • sch.PNG
    sch.PNG
    37.3 KB · Views: 156
Revisiting this thread as I am creating new design layout in KiCAD now. Schematics attached reflects all of the components that might be placed but could be omitted. Main filter caps are 6800uF and are 25mm in diameter. Makes for a nice compact PSU board.
 

Attachments

  • psu_sch.png
    psu_sch.png
    37.4 KB · Views: 129