Large (350 Hz) 3D printed 1.4" William Neile ALO horn by sphericalhorns.net

Member
Joined 2008
Paid Member
Thanks to a very fruitful cooperation with Dr. Bernd Ahlswede from www.sphericalhorns.net, I can introduce my second large 3D printed horn (the first being the multicell horn for JBL2445). It consists of 9 parts and almost 3 kg of PLA. The 62 cm wide horn was cut to fit my Flsun Super Racer printer, it took more than 60 hours of printing time.

It is glued with Mamut construction glue with a few M3 bolts and nuts for alignment. The inside is only roughly sanded, coated with photo resin and two layers of grey spray paint.

The pictures show the construction and building process. It is still work in progress, the prototype was put together as a feasibility test. It seems to resonate quite strongly, so I will try various ways of damping the horn walls and also second unit with added ribs was printed and is waiting for assembly.

It is intended for BC DCX464 coaxial driver.
 

Attachments

  • 4FCB8CF2-1939-4919-94C1-70C4F3C07735.jpeg
    4FCB8CF2-1939-4919-94C1-70C4F3C07735.jpeg
    377.8 KB · Views: 356
  • BB41AD1C-2081-4A1C-8AF7-E9B7CE02DD23.jpeg
    BB41AD1C-2081-4A1C-8AF7-E9B7CE02DD23.jpeg
    509.5 KB · Views: 352
  • EAD0F6E0-C822-4C17-A785-C3AC79A28E70.jpeg
    EAD0F6E0-C822-4C17-A785-C3AC79A28E70.jpeg
    349.1 KB · Views: 350
  • ADCFF771-EF3F-492F-A353-B844DDB09D26.jpeg
    ADCFF771-EF3F-492F-A353-B844DDB09D26.jpeg
    400.5 KB · Views: 331
  • 09D43C99-1081-4745-8D02-A688ADDC9D0D.jpeg
    09D43C99-1081-4745-8D02-A688ADDC9D0D.jpeg
    260.4 KB · Views: 318
  • CB616918-1C59-408A-B4F4-94F25947A934.jpeg
    CB616918-1C59-408A-B4F4-94F25947A934.jpeg
    623 KB · Views: 324
  • 9CA3D9ED-3A5C-47FF-8D97-2B0AE906BCC8.jpeg
    9CA3D9ED-3A5C-47FF-8D97-2B0AE906BCC8.jpeg
    479.7 KB · Views: 328
  • 3DC2F2BC-F03C-4897-94B1-69AA9C95D445.jpeg
    3DC2F2BC-F03C-4897-94B1-69AA9C95D445.jpeg
    892.1 KB · Views: 332
  • Like
Reactions: 14 users
Member
Joined 2008
Paid Member
As far as I can tell, this is not really necessary. I built also a smaller one out of MDF for 1" driver, as mentioned in the recent article. That one has a bit more roundover, in my opinion that is all that is needed, but Bernd would definitely explain better.

Here is one more photo of the horn with a stand just printed.

8B8129DB-1229-4280-8CA6-D627F55616F3.jpeg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: 2 users
I wonder if the horn could be further optimised with lecleach style roundovers on the edges, to possibly meld with a cabinet and reduce edge diffraction beyond 90°.
The BEM model used had no roundover like DonVK created several times for my designs. Just a tiny one as existing for a real horn resolves most of the roughness you might see.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Member
Joined 2008
Paid Member
Today I had the pleasure to meet Bernd in person. The suspected resonance was in fact a reflection interference, we did a few measurements together and the results are really exceptional performance. The improvements in stiffness of V2 will definitely not hurt, but were not really necessary. I will do some more measurements on V2 when it is finished. This horn is an ideal match to the DCX464. I am excited to make some listening tests in near future.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 users
The pleasure was of course also my side! I will need some days to reflect with all these overwhelming impressions. And I have a prototype in my car for testing :)

The day was so dense that I forgot to take some photos. Especially the wood horns Jaroslav created catched my attention. This story is definitively going on!

And finally, many thanks for the hospitality!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
They look d..n cool to say the least !

Which advantage do you expect from the DCX in a home setting compared to an ordinary modern high-quality driver ? Its tweeter section has more HD than many other 1.4" drivers. There is of course the IMD advantage of multiple ways but does it make an audible difference at home SPLs ? Did you have the possibility to compare ?

Sorry for OT.

Regards

Charles
 
I wonder if the horn could be further optimised with lecleach style roundovers on the edges, to possibly meld with a cabinet and reduce edge diffraction beyond 90°.

I have a thread called "what do roundovers do?"

It basically came to the same conclusion as @pelanj and @bwaslo - the roundover is unnecessary if the waveguide is sufficiently large.
Roundovers ARE very useful when the waveguide is smaller than the largest wavelength that it radiates. For instance, if you have a 12.7cm waveguide that plays down to 1350Hz (34cm) you definitely want a roundover.
 
I have a thread called "what do roundovers do?"

It basically came to the same conclusion as @pelanj and @bwaslo - the roundover is unnecessary if the waveguide is sufficiently large.
Roundovers ARE very useful when the waveguide is smaller than the largest wavelength that it radiates. For instance, if you have a 12.7cm waveguide that plays down to 1350Hz (34cm) you definitely want a roundover.
At the moment I'm designing a Joseph Crowe inspired horn for an SB26ADC tweeter, 3rd order cross at 1.8kHz with an SB15NBAC. I'm aiming to have an octave lower of loading to ensure a smooth transition, so the horn isn't likely large enough to not require the roundovers. I may keep them as it's meant to meld with the front baffle anyway.
 

Attachments

  • 1.8kHzHorn.png
    1.8kHzHorn.png
    298.5 KB · Views: 193
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Member
Joined 2008
Paid Member
So here is impedance measurement (thanks to Bernd and his Clio Pocket) - free air (red) and on the horn (blue) - only the MF part, HF part shorted. FR measurements I have are not good at the low end, since they were taken in a small room and when gated properly, the low end resolution is really bad.
 

Attachments

  • dcx464_imp.jpg
    dcx464_imp.jpg
    167.9 KB · Views: 184
So here is impedance measurement (thanks to Bernd and his Clio Pocket) - free air (red) and on the horn (blue) - only the MF part, HF part shorted. FR measurements I have are not good at the low end, since they were taken in a small room and when gated properly, the low end resolution is really bad.
Do you have any decay waterfall measurements to see if any of the impedance spikes result in resonance/horn reflection?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Member
Joined 2008
Paid Member
Second, slightly improved version, is finally glued together. It still needs some work after the glue hardens - use some putty for the throat part transition to the rest two or three times and also on the seams.
 

Attachments

  • DDBAF06C-0C71-45AF-9913-DB9D72DA9D88.jpeg
    DDBAF06C-0C71-45AF-9913-DB9D72DA9D88.jpeg
    352.6 KB · Views: 223
  • Like
Reactions: 8 users