Well are you going to give kicad a go and make a PCB?
No, for such a simple circuit P2P should do fine, and gives the amplifier a more traditional look as well, which I can certainly appreciate.
More that you have removed to two 100R cathode resistors.
Yes, I've actually removed and added these cathode resistors several times with the various iterations of this design, they never netted such a significant reduction in overall THD.
This is the status quo of the prototype, I'm wondering what else I could possibly do to further reduce distortion? I've been going over old schematics from the '50s and '60s trying to find more tweaks to that effect, but other than the 'Schade' approach, which I already tried and which didn't yield a positive effect, I've not found anything yet? Open to suggestions if anyone has any?
Proto 051
Proto 051
P.s. this seems to line up with my findings?My take is that the two triodes inside the 6922 are not perfectly balanced, which makes sense, and by changing the anode resistors AC balance is restored so now the loop gain that was available has less distortion to work with which nets lower overall distortion.
https://www.aikenamps.com/index.php/the-long-tail-pair
When only one signal input is used (ignoring feedback inputs) R1 is usually made 10% - 20% lower than R2 to compensate the unbalanced gains of the two tube sections and make the two output amplitudes equal.
This could be something to try, it seems to yield a net positive result in the simulator, has anyone ever attempted this?
When only one signal input is used (ignoring feedback inputs) R1 is usually made 10% - 20% lower than R2 to compensate the unbalanced gains of the two tube sections and make the two output amplitudes equal.
That's when you don't have a CCS in the tail. When you do the AC balance is near perfect as the the current in one tube is CCS-the other. The plate resistors will affect AC balance hence you added the pot. The remaining 2nd harmonic is maybe mismatches in the KT88. LT spice of course will consider them identical.
I like the very low distortion approach but with the high levels of GNFB amp will sound like any modern amp - i.e. blameless. I think what you have is great. Hum issues and buzz from the mains transformer can also factor in the experience.
That's when you don't have a CCS in the tail. When you do the AC balance is near perfect as the the current in one tube is CCS-the other. The plate resistors will affect AC balance hence you added the pot. The remaining 2nd harmonic is maybe mismatches in the KT88. LT spice of course will consider them identical.
Could very well be, my KT88s need a different bias voltage to draw the same amount of current.
I like the very low distortion approach but with the high levels of GNFB amp will sound like any modern amp - i.e. blameless. I think what you have is great. Hum issues and buzz from the mains transformer can also factor in the experience.
It is quieter than a mouse, with your ear right up to the speaker cone, or tweeter, you hear absolutely nothing.
Do you have a spare?
No, I built one prototype, I might build another, but I will probably just go ahead and put two mono amplifiers in a case as that was my original plan.
OK when you do watch for a differential hum loop. That's when a current runs between the L and R screens of the inputs and through the 0V induced by the magnetic field of the mains transformer. If you place the input stage tubes as close as possible rather than having two amp spaced apart. Just a trap to fall into.
Start with a pair of reasonably well matched good 6922 triodes (and in the same glass envelope).
Use a perfect CCS (Constant Current Sink) that is connected directly to both triode's cathodes.
Use perfectly matched perfectly accurate plate load resistors of 33,000 Ohms.
Use a signal generator to drive a 1k grid stopper resistor to the first grid.
The signal amplitude needs to be in the linear and non-clipping range of the phase inverter.
Ground the second grid through a second 1k grid stopper resistor.
Suppose the signal drive to the first grid causes its plate to increase by 0.500mA.
The CCS will take away 0.500mA from the other tubes cathode, so its plate current will reduce by 0.500 mA.
First plate voltage will reduce by -0.000500A x 33,000 Ohms = plate voltage reduction of -16.500 Volts
Second plate voltage will increase by +0.000500A x 33,000 Ohms = plate voltage increase by -16.500 Volts
Do you see how that works?
The balance is perfect.
No current goes into either grid. No current comes out of either grid.
The plate current changes are equal and in opposite directions.
The total CCS current is Constant.
Do you have to adjust the signal amplitude balance of the two plates?
No.
The balance is Intrinsic due to the circuit topology.
Simulation Experts:
Do you want to simulate what can happen with an unmatched pair of triodes?
u = Gm x rp
In your tube models, Increase Gm by 2% and decrease rp by 2% of one triode versus the other triode (u will be unchanged).
Run the simulation with the 2% unmatched Gm and 2% unmatched rp of one triode versus the other triode.
Find the resultant difference of the two plate signal amplitude voltages.
That is the only cause of un-balanced phase inverter amplitudes.
Excellent tube matching will eliminate that error.
Use a perfect CCS (Constant Current Sink) that is connected directly to both triode's cathodes.
Use perfectly matched perfectly accurate plate load resistors of 33,000 Ohms.
Use a signal generator to drive a 1k grid stopper resistor to the first grid.
The signal amplitude needs to be in the linear and non-clipping range of the phase inverter.
Ground the second grid through a second 1k grid stopper resistor.
Suppose the signal drive to the first grid causes its plate to increase by 0.500mA.
The CCS will take away 0.500mA from the other tubes cathode, so its plate current will reduce by 0.500 mA.
First plate voltage will reduce by -0.000500A x 33,000 Ohms = plate voltage reduction of -16.500 Volts
Second plate voltage will increase by +0.000500A x 33,000 Ohms = plate voltage increase by -16.500 Volts
Do you see how that works?
The balance is perfect.
No current goes into either grid. No current comes out of either grid.
The plate current changes are equal and in opposite directions.
The total CCS current is Constant.
Do you have to adjust the signal amplitude balance of the two plates?
No.
The balance is Intrinsic due to the circuit topology.
Simulation Experts:
Do you want to simulate what can happen with an unmatched pair of triodes?
u = Gm x rp
In your tube models, Increase Gm by 2% and decrease rp by 2% of one triode versus the other triode (u will be unchanged).
Run the simulation with the 2% unmatched Gm and 2% unmatched rp of one triode versus the other triode.
Find the resultant difference of the two plate signal amplitude voltages.
That is the only cause of un-balanced phase inverter amplitudes.
Excellent tube matching will eliminate that error.
Last edited:
Yes, in a perfect world this applies, and when you whip up a LTP on the bench as you suggested. The issue here is that it is in circuit, with either triode not driving the exact same load, no doubt not even purely resistive, so when asked to drive a different impedance the AC amplitude will differ, simply because of Ohms law. The fact that some tube amplifiers that have an LTP also have a AC balance pot probably wasn’t a mistake?
Further to this, this is my understanding:
1) A CCS assures AC balance IF the plate loads are balanced.
2) The AC balance is completely independent of the tube matching.
3) A CCS does NOT assure DC balance.
1) A CCS assures AC balance IF the plate loads are balanced.
2) The AC balance is completely independent of the tube matching.
3) A CCS does NOT assure DC balance.
Yes. The degree of imbalance from imperfect CCS is a function of the ratio of CCS impedance and 1/Gm (reciprocal of valve transconductance).
All good fortune,
Chris
All good fortune,
Chris
Yes!Do you want to simulate what can happen with an unmatched pair of triodes?
Using 1/2 6SN7, 1/2 12AU7, confirms #217: AC->balanced (1mv mismatch in the simulation, very simple CCS), DC->not balanced.
Okay, I think it is about time to put two of these into a case, I wouldn't know where I would be able to improve on this.
Proto 052
THD vs. power - 1kHz
Proto 052
THD vs. power - 1kHz
Last edited:
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Tubes / Valves
- KT88 PP - Dotting the Is, crossing the Ts