KSA50 AMP(New production Live in...)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hi Abin

i look once again some schematic, bom jan and pinkmouse & pcb
i realise there isnt 2pcs X 22uf / 16v in your board

i give you jan & al (pink mouse) BOM (build of material)
Jan Dupont - Pavel Dudek give this 22uf on the board after a long
discussion. Even didnt look at the bom there is 2 pcs X 22uf / 16 v
on AL Boards

in ksa 100 thread i look they change this electrolyt 22uf/16 to mkp
1 uf (mundorf Mcap)

my question is
- why you remove this caps ?
- if i want to use this caps where the best place for it ?

the 22UF that part necessity has not used it.
 
Today's test result, each pair of tube's operating current is the 1A,1 hour later operating temperature is 60C。
 

Attachments

  • k1.jpg
    k1.jpg
    76.9 KB · Views: 326
  • k2.jpg
    k2.jpg
    105.6 KB · Views: 314
  • k3.jpg
    k3.jpg
    85.8 KB · Views: 324
  • k4.jpg
    k4.jpg
    113.3 KB · Views: 309
  • k5.jpg
    k5.jpg
    65.7 KB · Views: 302
  • k6.jpg
    k6.jpg
    85 KB · Views: 128
  • k7.jpg
    k7.jpg
    30.9 KB · Views: 107
  • k8.jpg
    k8.jpg
    53.3 KB · Views: 97
the 22UF that part necessity has not used it.

heres the link from Jan Dupont himself look post # 48
http://www.diyaudio.com/forums/solid-state/31077-krell-ksa-50-pcb-5.html

Pavel:
Thanks for correcting me 😉
I must learn not to read and write when I'm tired 🙁

Bratislav (and others):
The V-I limiter was put in as an additional options for those who would like some kind of protection.
Don't like it ??? Don't use it 😉

The output coil are shown in the schematic for those who will build this amp with new high freq. transistors....
I'm not sure how it will respond to modern components, so better be safe than sorry 😉
And again: Don't like it ??? Don't use it 😉

Please keep the comments comming😀

You're right ABIN, will be OK without 22uf
 
Last edited:
Today's test result, each pair of tube's operating current is the 1A,1 hour later operating temperature is 60C。

Hi gxcabin , what voltage are you Running at?

My tests was done with +-30V and 1.5A (750ma per device).

My heat sink is 0.33C/W

30V at 1.5A calculates to 45W ,so total heat is 90W per channel.

90W on 0.33c/w = 29.7C increase.

Room was 25C and I measured 55C on the heatsink (device = 60C) after about 30 minutes.

750mA per device calculates to 3Amp total = 36W into 8ohm = 14W into 4ohm

Is my math correct? Do I understand ksa50 calculations correct?
 
Hi Abin

Hi! tangmonster
620P changes 330P .
100P to be possible not to use.

Hi Tangmonster

Hi gxcabin, I changed my 620P to 470p i am sure 330p will also be fine. -3db is around 100Khz with 470p.

As soon as i have it up and running i will do tests with the oscilloscope and check wave forms. i might then leave out 100P or make it higher value.

Thanks!

In other thread 330uf replace by 47uf, 620p still there
(pink mouse use osciloscope for this)
so what decision you will take guys

btw abin, why you give 100p before ?
 
Hi gxcabin , what voltage are you Running at?

My tests was done with +-30V and 1.5A (750ma per device).

My heat sink is 0.33C/W

30V at 1.5A calculates to 45W ,so total heat is 90W per channel.

90W on 0.33c/w = 29.7C increase.

Room was 25C and I measured 55C on the heatsink (device = 60C) after about 30 minutes.

750mA per device calculates to 3Amp total = 36W into 8ohm = 14W into 4ohm

Is my math correct? Do I understand ksa50 calculations correct?

LUKE use 0.32c/w heatsink with 1,5A, He tried 1,9A then back again to 1,5A
 
12AX7 \ 12AU7 vacuum tube Pre-amplifier also completed.
 

Attachments

  • IMGP3231.JPG
    IMGP3231.JPG
    72.1 KB · Views: 220
  • IMGP3232.JPG
    IMGP3232.JPG
    54.9 KB · Views: 84
  • IMGP3235.JPG
    IMGP3235.JPG
    193.8 KB · Views: 85
  • IMGP3250.JPG
    IMGP3250.JPG
    129.9 KB · Views: 77
  • IMGP3249.JPG
    IMGP3249.JPG
    144.7 KB · Views: 76
  • IMGP3236.JPG
    IMGP3236.JPG
    123.8 KB · Views: 88
  • IMGP3251.JPG
    IMGP3251.JPG
    118.4 KB · Views: 79
  • IMGP3252.JPG
    IMGP3252.JPG
    173.3 KB · Views: 85
  • IMGP3253.JPG
    IMGP3253.JPG
    187.2 KB · Views: 88
Status
Not open for further replies.