John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier

Status
Not open for further replies.
john curl said:
This is so ----. Wake up! I don't want to add a buffer! I want an op amp made properly for audio in the first place. Any FOOL can add a buffer, BUT it is more to pass through and more expensive as well.


I felt like a fool writing it too, but out of curiosity what is your source (eg turntable) and what is your minimum load (eg headphones).

Regards
Arthur
 
The THS4275 has an open loop -3dB at about 50kHz - even good enough for me.
Kinda noisy, though: about 40nV/sqrt(Hz) @ 1kHz.....

And this is the dilemma as I see it: no OPAmp is perfect enough, so one often must design one's own amplifier.




Sigurd

syn08 said:


All valid concerns, but if you put some numbers and look at the modern opamp specs you'll find it's not that bad as you expect.

E.g. integrated DSL drivers have an amazing output current drive with extremely low distortions and noise. This is essential, 'cause any distortions means wasted bandwidth for the same date rate. Disadvantages: low supply voltages (+/-5V) and rather large input bias current. Look at THS4275 fig. 5 and up.

Other ICs have still very high drive current capability, also very high supply voltages. Take a look at OPA551 JFET input, with +/-30V supply and 200mA output current capability. Disadvantage: not very fast, distortions and noise performance are average.

If you really want the best of all worlds, get a current feedback, high output current opamp, like LT1210 Supports +/-15V supplies, has 1.1Amps output current, 55MHz bandwidth, 900V/uS slew rate, voltage noise 3nV/rtHz, current noise (on the non-inverting input, typical for a current feedback configuration) 3pA/rtHz. Comes in TO220 to allow heatsinking. The only disadvantage that I can think of is price: not the cheapest around, but definitely not outrageous at $17 in singles. The sibling LT1206 with only 250mA output current sells in singles for about half of that, which is already affordable.

 
Wavebourn said:
Hmmm... Trying to find some AD8010 to play with I opened 3 types of DSL modems I had in my barn, but did not find any... 🙁

You won't find any in there. Most home units will have an integrated (CMOS) solution these days anyway. Even I don't have any of those.

A general warning, DSL drivers are packaged for the very high crest factor application i.e. they are very easy to burn up with full power sine waves. As a rule you must make good thermal contact to the heat tab, this is not an easy DIY. Find jcx's headphone stuff for hints.
 
This is pointless, and about as far from the CTC BLOWTORCH concept, as a typical Chevy is from a RUF-Porsche, in concept and execution.
It appears that no IC's are really, really good, and IC designers find no good reason to make them better for audio, just different.
I do know that the AD797 was used in some way by Dick Sequerra to make a phono stage, BUT he did significantly modify it from its original intent, and THAT is why he got extra special results. I just thought that using the 'best' for the stage IC's was a good idea, and it still will be, but it won't make a Porsche, only a VW, and NO tarting it up with output stages or load fets will change that. It is like taking a VW truck engine and putting it into a Porsche body. Been there and I know what that is all about.
Perhaps, we can discuss other details that made the BLOWTORCH so special to its owners, but with this intellectual climate, I don't see an easy direction. You see, subtlety is possible to be overlooked by typical designers, and jeered at when it is offered, even for free and with an open heart.
 
john curl said:
This is pointless, and about as far from the CTC BLOWTORCH concept, as a typical Chevy is from a RUF-Porsche, in concept and execution.
It appears that no IC's are really, really good, and IC designers find no good reason to make them better for audio, just different.
I do know that the AD797 was used in some way by Dick Sequerra to make a phono stage, BUT he did significantly modify it from its original intent, and THAT is why he got extra special results. I just thought that using the 'best' for the stage IC's was a good idea, and it still will be, but it won't make a Porsche, only a VW, and NO tarting it up with output stages or load fets will change that. It is like taking a VW truck engine and putting it into a Porsche body. Been there and I know what that is all about.
Perhaps, we can discuss other details that made the BLOWTORCH so special to its owners, but with this intellectual climate, I don't see an easy direction. You see, subtlety is possible to be overlooked by typical designers, and jeered at when it is offered, even for free and with an open heart.

Q.E.D.

As expected, this is what all this noise about opamps was for: to help you concluding about yourself and your BT as surviving 40 years of technology advances. Perpetrating a myth at any cost, that's all you care about.
 
Elephant and Pug

Along the streets Big Elephant was led,
To show him off, most likely.
Since Elephants are not a common thing to see
A crowd of gapers followed on his heels.
All of a sudden Pug springs up in front of them.
And seeing Elephant, it raises a great rumpus,
It lunges, barks and howls
And does its best to pick a quarrel.
"Hey neighbor, stop the fuss,"
A mutt intones, "You? Deal with Elephant?
Look at you barking yourself hoarse, and he just strolls
Nonplussed
And doesn't care one bit about your noise."
"Ho ho!" Pug says,
"That's just what I enjoy,
Since I can be a real tough guy
Without a single blow or bruise.
That way, the other dogs will say:
"To bark at Elephant this Pug
Must be a real strong mug!"
--
A.I.Krylov, circa 1815
 
My thoughts about the BLOWTORCH this morning started by me independently realizing that no more BLOWTORCHES will ever be built, partially because Bob Crump, the guy who gave it most of its extra special quality, is deceased, and has been for years. I never learned how to make his line cords, so they never will be reproduced again, for example. However, that is my personal observation, and not important to the vast majority here. Bear understands, I'm sure.
It is interesting that Charles Hansen has made his own discrete version of an IC type design, recently, perhaps we can learn from him how to do it 'right'.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.