The quantum resistors are not Bybee's quantum devices. They are in parallel with the quantum devices.
Here we go again.
1. It doesn't exist.
2. It exists, but it is not important.
3. NEXT?(you fill in this blank)
1. It doesn't exist.
2. It exists, but it is not important.
3. NEXT?(you fill in this blank)
Quantum resistors are not absolutely necessary to make quantum purifiers work, but they help. Any ideas why?
For the record, the majority of quantum purifiers that I have on hand and in my audio system, do NOT use quantum resistors, but another resistor material. The best units use the highest Fermi velocity that can be normally obtained. Normal, non-inductive power resistors are 3'rd best.
For the record, the majority of quantum purifiers that I have on hand and in my audio system, do NOT use quantum resistors, but another resistor material. The best units use the highest Fermi velocity that can be normally obtained. Normal, non-inductive power resistors are 3'rd best.
john curl said:
Probably the same reason super magnets are an improvement over ferrites in MEG generators for taking free energy out of the Zero Point.
I don't think that is the reason.
Scott, if you don't believe me, just ask Dick Sequerra. He knows. Please, I don't want you to alienate me, further. I think better of you.
Scott, if you don't believe me, just ask Dick Sequerra. He knows. Please, I don't want you to alienate me, further. I think better of you.
john curl said:
I have a better idea, let's get back to circuit topologies this quantum stuff is like digging a big black hole for the one electron to hide in.
I remember in 1959, arguing with my first college math professor, that the answer to dividing by zero was infinity. (didn't know about limits at the time). The professor said it was 'undefined'. Same thing here, it is difficult to get around new concepts that violate OHM's law, etc., but it is necessary to grow.
Jon Lord said:
If this has something to do with Mr. Bybee's resistors, then the output of a purifier would be also quantized ?
Does this mean, that current noise (as well as all other small signals), which falls below a certain threshold is "eaten up" or modulated into an even bigger amount of quantization noise, hopefully out of audio band ?
For me this sounds like sending the signal through a low resolution quantizer, hoping to get a higher dynamic range, without knowing what the original signal is ... strange thing 😉
So a two node, passive noise shaper or what ? Not really ...
this is -
Quantization (physics)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantization_(physics)
this is Not (in this context) -
Quantization (signal processing)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantization_(signal_processing)
others -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantization
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
http://www.scienceblog.com/cms/scientists-create-complete-radio-single-nanotube-14665.html
the above + http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very-large-scale_integration
could lead to 'music/signals' directed in to living cells
For me this is a sign of hiding a weak point to say: "Just ask A or B about this" etc.
If you know really something about the way these resistors/purifiers work and you stand behind it, you could tell us or provide a link, isn't it ?
Nanomaterials are about to be regulated by the EPA. They could be hazardous. Scott, you should be careful about what you commit to eat. EPA
While I think there is interesting stuff in carbon nanotubes we are only looking from a distance, with little real knowledge of how they work or how to use them.
And discovery's can come from strange places. I have been helping an experimenter develop room temperature superconductors at a distance. He may be completely off base but he seems to know enough about what he is doing that I'm willing to risk some time and resources to push him along. If he did pull it off and I had blown him off when he asked for help I would feel really stupid.
While I think there is interesting stuff in carbon nanotubes we are only looking from a distance, with little real knowledge of how they work or how to use them.
And discovery's can come from strange places. I have been helping an experimenter develop room temperature superconductors at a distance. He may be completely off base but he seems to know enough about what he is doing that I'm willing to risk some time and resources to push him along. If he did pull it off and I had blown him off when he asked for help I would feel really stupid.
Goodness gracious! Who says John is required to agree with me, or I with him? We agree on some things, certainly, but I suspect that we could easily find a number of things we disagree on if we put our minds to it.
Here, I'll start things off:
I'm afraid the Porsche 924 (that's what John drives, isn't it?) isn't for me. I test drove one way back when and found that the steering wheel rested on my thighs. As I recall, the steering wheel wasn't adjustable, as is so common today. I was afraid that in a...spirited, shall we say...driving situation that I would fail to negotiate a turn because my hand would strike my leg and prevent me from turning the wheel sufficiently.
I believe one of the car magazines of the time (Car & Driver?) mentioned the same thing in a review of the car.
I've got some faint recollection that they may have changed the angle of the steering wheel to make it more user friendly. John may be able to say yea or nay on this, as he's kept up on car-related things more than I have.
Besides, I was holding out for a 911.
Never bought either one, but that's another story.
Grey
P.S.: Lew Johnson (of Conrad Johnson) took me for a spin in his 928 once when I was in town. Lotsa fun, but more money than I could justify. Some foolish part of me still wants to buy a used 928, but there's no point, really. Where would I drive it?
Here, I'll start things off:
I'm afraid the Porsche 924 (that's what John drives, isn't it?) isn't for me. I test drove one way back when and found that the steering wheel rested on my thighs. As I recall, the steering wheel wasn't adjustable, as is so common today. I was afraid that in a...spirited, shall we say...driving situation that I would fail to negotiate a turn because my hand would strike my leg and prevent me from turning the wheel sufficiently.
I believe one of the car magazines of the time (Car & Driver?) mentioned the same thing in a review of the car.
I've got some faint recollection that they may have changed the angle of the steering wheel to make it more user friendly. John may be able to say yea or nay on this, as he's kept up on car-related things more than I have.
Besides, I was holding out for a 911.
Never bought either one, but that's another story.
Grey
P.S.: Lew Johnson (of Conrad Johnson) took me for a spin in his 928 once when I was in town. Lotsa fun, but more money than I could justify. Some foolish part of me still wants to buy a used 928, but there's no point, really. Where would I drive it?
- Status
- Not open for further replies.