John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier

Status
Not open for further replies.
Charles,
I can't seem to load your PDF. It's coming up blank.
Both,
Yes, the JC-2 and JC-3 use what I am calling a sideways H. I've used that topology, but have not used a vertical/normal H.
I'd be interested in either or both of you commenting on pros and cons of the two Hs.

Grey
 
john curl said:
Did I violate a patent?


😀 😀 😀

don´t think so, the H (vertical if you want) configuration is common knowledge. I found it in a book from the 70ties!

Advantage is, that you can taylor the open loop gain independent of Ids, wheras in the Sideways H both items form a linear relationship with all the disadvantages of such a relationship.

Uli

:nod: :nod: :nod:
 
john curl said:
Grey, it is again a language problem. 51 ohms gives low Iq and slightly higher noise. 10 ohms gives optimum Iq, BUT not optimum degeneration, so you have to add the 5th resistor of 200 ohms or so.

John, 10 Ohms is the optimum value I guess for a line level input or so (0 / -10db), but will you also use this value for lower levels, mic or an MC preamp? I would use a smaller value (gain, linearity and noise purposes) but not less than 3.3 Ohms, as in the example below:

MC preamp Part2

I think that many of us (me at least) biased by the picture expected a very specific input stage arrangement ! Probably why so many questions about it !!!
 
I know a famous example similar to yours but with 2x 2SK147/2SJ72 at the input. They feature 6R19 from the junction of the 2 sources to gnd. From One source junction to the other there is a 20R trimmer with wiper to gnd. In total is this about 7,5 - 8R from each source to gnd and this circuit is one of the most famous phono input stages.

Nelson Pass used 22R but for 2SK170GR.


Uli

:nod: :nod: :nod:
 
Actually I think that it is somewhat difficult to get an exact value for every source condition. This is because it depends on how hard the input stage has to work in order to give reasonable output to the outside world, and what the source impedance is in front of the fet.
It is possible and practical, in many situations, to slightly forward bias the fet, IF the source resistance is reasonably low. If it is very high, let's say: Above 100kohm, then maybe, forward biasing is a little dangerous. It is very interesting that with very low impedance drive, fets will forward bias and still work very well. Tubes do much the same thing.
 
john curl said:
.................
It is possible and practical, in many situations, to slightly forward bias the fet, IF the source resistance is reasonably low. ............. It is very interesting that with very low impedance drive, fets will forward bias and still work very well. Tubes do much the same thing.
Hi John,
could you explain this forward bias and how it differs from ordinary bias?
How do we set up a circuit to achieve one or the other?
 
GRollins said:
I believe he said he was using 2SK170BL devices.

I wonder how he manages a draincurrent below 3mA per device with 22R and BL type

😉

Uli

:nod: :nod: :nod:
 

Attachments

  • np.gif
    np.gif
    7.3 KB · Views: 778
Status
Not open for further replies.