John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part IV

Status
Not open for further replies.
No one here is interested of the relationship between listening tests and measurement.

True, for various reasons.

Some are not interested because they think as you describe: Below some given threshold of hearing they believe it doesn't matter.

Others are not interested because they believe the correlation between hearing and AP measurements is too limited to spend too much time on. Listening and AP are for separate purposes, they are not expected to correlate perfectly.
 
Tourny,

You need to give some slack to those who are obviously ailing. As it seems many are here.

This is a place of social interaction for many who seem to have no other outlet. Yes they may behave badly but as their circumstances and isolation are unknown issues just putting up with them often does them benefit.
 
The reality is that the volume markets are using highly integrated solutions because they prioritize PCBA real-estate, low number of external components, and cost.
I hope so. This is the normal evolution: VLSIs. As integrated circuit replaced the discrete components, VLSIs replace nowadays printed boards everywhere it is possible. Miniaturisation, integration. And, with digital, it is not a technical problem. Does-it not means that audio quality and performance are neglected ? On the contrary.
 
No I think when a manufacturer does a process tweak and it is also good for audio parts they will use it for that.

John,

Thanks for stepping in. On the parts finished after you moved, so far I am using a bit more than 3,000 of them and way more should be required in the next year or two. It is nice to see such good parts at unreasonably low prices!

BTY I do not expect any sane manufacturer to change parts or processes based on listening tests. I expect listening tests are more of an educational effort to correlate that experience with which measurements or other processes seem to be important.

I can only imagine the corporate reaction to "We have a problem with that item as the midrange definition is lacking!"

I did enjoy the visit from your colleagues and owe then a thank-you email and follow up on the issue of DC blocking capacitor values and circuit topography discussed a bit earlier. Only open issue was Vadim seemed not to like my use of electrolytic capacitors on the PCB but held off saying anything. Still wondering!

Vadim also reminded me of my grandfather, same accent.

I had no idea we let Vadim out of the building to visit customers, but I'm glad you got to meet him! Most of his work in recent years has been on high precision choppers, but he was involved with the OPA1692 initially.

I really would have liked to bring Steve, the designer of the OPA1622 and OPA1656 (among others) to visit customers. He reported to the Tucson group remotely from Florida, often dragging a workstation out to his boat so he could keep designing op amps on it (true story). A true audio enthusiast, who loved Janis Joplin, and hung his turntable from the ceiling in an effort to eliminate vibration. He retired about a year ago though and spends most of his time traveling.

We've got an eclectic group here in Arizona. I still see the designer of the OPA2134 every day. He grew up in Poland in the communist system before escaping to the U.S., he snuck away on a school trip to Austria. He has hilarious stories about how he would smuggle blue jeans into Russia to sell, and would take that money and buy as many Russian hats as he could take back to Poland to sell, to buy more jeans...
 
Last edited:
When I worked in Prague in the very early 80s jeans and ladies tights (panty hose to those cross pondians here) were excellent currency!

I wish I could remember all the steps to his arbitrage scheme, I just know it started with jeans and ended with hats. But I know there were many other goods along the way. From the way he tells it, it seems like he spent a good portion of his youth riding trains and convincing customs officers not to check his luggage or the overhead compartments...
 
These Red Lines seem a bit random in their removal. A thousand insults come my way or others and nothing happens. Its a regular 'feature' here. Some can give it out but cant take it themselves. Cry baby.


Anyway, three terminal IC volt regs of the series pass type with emitter follower output do not regulate well when lightly loaded..... say about 0-10% load region. So, I pre-load the output (say 1K) which moves the operation into a more linear region and as a side benefit, seems to improve the response time/BW.

There must be many others with a favorite circuit trick or two. What is yours' ?


THx-RNMarsh
 
Last edited:
Using a special homebuilt jig to observe the worst-case value of AC mains inrush current. The jig carefully controls the phase angle at which the equipment is switched on. Set it for the worst case phase, get the worst case inrush. I think I posted a photo of it in the predecessor "part II" thread.

Thats sounds useful. Is it hard to build? Got schematic?

Surely, we dont all just buy an IC and go by spec sheets only. P-n-P.

Come on all you designers show us some original and useful circuit tricks.




THx-RNMarsh
 
Last edited:
RNM,

My favorite circuit trick is not to stick my tongue in an AC wall outlet! This has served me well all my life!!! 😉

Sorry just gotta use the straight line.

ES

Ha, I once knew a guy who decided to strip the plastic off the twin flex cable on one of those old 110V line public address systems with his teeth when someone decided at that moment to make an announcement 😀
 
Thats sounds useful. Is it hard to build? Got schematic?

Surely, we dont all just buy an IC and go by spec sheets only. P-n-P.

Come on all you designers show us some original and useful circuit tricks.




THx-RNMarsh


Class A Buffering the Correct Way

A trick I learned from diyaudio member jcx who as I mentioned a few weeks ago has a bag full of neat tricks.

(I haven't seen jcx around for a while BTW)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.