😀You two, get a room.
Arf!
Chris
I didn't think the topic appropriate for the thread..
Jn
You gave an example of a 20kHz fundamental which is what I questioned, not that harmonics can go higher. Dog whistles are up there but can anyone hear one other that the hiss of breath?
As a matter of interest what free software can handle 192k recordings? I would be interested in looking at the leading edge to see what the rise time was.
As a matter of interest what free software can handle 192k recordings? I would be interested in looking at the leading edge to see what the rise time was.
It doesn't keep me awake at night no. I have other worries.
Bill,
I can understand, from what has been implied about you, you are short, fat, stupid, ugly and deaf. So my congratulations on overcoming such disadvantages!
Apparently the only one worse off is JN or maybe RNM.
The upside is most folks have quit picking on J.C.!
So obviously keep up the good work. 😉
You forgot young...Bill,
I can understand, from what has been implied about you, you are short, fat, stupid, ugly and deaf. So my congratulations on overcoming such disadvantages!
Apparently the only one worse off is JN or maybe RNM.
Luckily, I grew outta that.
Jn
Ed: But I still have all my own hair 🙂
It doesn't count when you keep it in a box!
All the best!
ES
I used those arbitrary numbers to show that amplitude modulation of an (arguably audible) frequency can create side bands that are absolutely out of audibility.You gave an example of a 20kHz fundamental which is what I questioned, not that harmonics can go higher. Dog whistles are up there but can anyone hear one other that the hiss of breath?
I do not have numbers on cymbal frequencies or envelope, so kept the discussion simple.
Edit: way back in this discussion, someone (IIRC PMA) said that a gated sine was a violation (it certainly is) and showed that it didn't take that long for the system to recover.
Why should a percussive instrument be treated differently?
As I said many moons ago, the reliance on frequency domain analysis only is tossing out temporal information. A neglected domain unfortunately.
Jn
Darn, exceeded my word count quota again..
Last edited:
Bill,
You grasp the obvious, I don't take much here seriously.
But then I knew you were psychic or is tha psychotic?
You grasp the obvious, I don't take much here seriously.
But then I knew you were psychic or is tha psychotic?
Bill,
I can understand, from what has been implied about you, you are short, fat, stupid, ugly and deaf.
but he sure plays a mean pinball..
You grasp the obvious, I don't take much here seriously.
The windup...here's the pitch...
That's ok Ed, nobody takes you seriously....😀
You did see that coming, yes?
Jn
But then I knew you were psychic or is tha psychotic?
Depends which ex you ask!
Why should a percussive instrument be treated differently?
As I said many moons ago, the reliance on frequency domain analysis only is tossing out temporal information. A neglected domain unfortunately.
Jn
.
🙂 😎
For JN to study --->
Temporal envelope and fine structure - Wikipedia
-RNM
Last edited:
I used those arbitrary numbers to show that amplitude modulation of an (arguably audible) frequency can create side bands that are absolutely out of audibility.
I do not have numbers on cymbal frequencies or envelope, so kept the discussion simple.
OK. I remain confused but it's a losing battle with me as I'm stuck in the paradigm of trying to reproduce real instruments in an acoustic environment as being a key driver.
Why should a percussive instrument be treated differently?
It shouldn't which is why I would be interested in analysing it.
The real challenge there is in the acoustic domainAs I said many moons ago, the reliance on frequency domain analysis only is tossing out temporal information. A neglected domain unfortunately.
And yet a cymbal recording just presented on this thread had up to 60 kHz content.
My concern is not that we can hear up to there. Rather, how much of the measured spectra is there because a lower frequency we can hear was modulated. Like leading edge of the envelope.
Filtering to limit so as to not violate nyquist will remove envelope modulation upper side bands. I assume only percussive type instruments need apply.
My trivial example of modulating 20 kHz with a 5 k sine should be simple enough for all to follow. What I have never seen is an actual formal analysis on real instruments and their real modulation envelopes to determine what side bands result from the envelope.
This is not rocket science.
Jn
I may have missed it, but what about the comment earlier that modern recording is done at a high sample rate and then downsampled or decimated to hit CD... So, the original sine is well oversampled, so not a fish.. 🙂 How does that affect the sidebands / beats, in theory, in your view?
If you check posting history you will see a number of occasions where my hearing has been called to question so I am well justified in getting pissed off!
Bill, presumably your hearing is normal or better for your age. Also, you are a smart guy with a good brain.
If there is any difference in hearing between you and someone else maybe it is in how your System 1 (from two system model of cognition) processes sound and presents it to conscious awareness. People do seem to vary in that respect, for example some having perfect pitch and some not. If someone is better at pitch discrimination so what? If better at some other similar type of listening discrimination so what again? Nothing to get pissed over, shouldn't be anyway.
Then downsampling and decimation will fishify it? No?... So, the original sine is well oversampled, so not a fish...
+1... People do seem to vary in that respect, for example some having perfect pitch and some not...
... Nothing to get pissed over, shouldn't be anyway.
I am younger than Pavel, yet I admit my hearing discrimination is not as good as his. No problem.
Last edited:
<…snip…>
Sorry, I’m not playing with you any silly semantic word games again, life is too short. You can take this message as an admission of wrong doing on my side, and you can now take a victory lap. You beat me with experience.
Bill,
Ever consider if our hearing is limited to 20,000 hertz why we would make musical instruments that only go to less than 5,000 hertz? ...
OK, you said there is no instrument with a higher fundamental that 5k. Fine. But how do you think a clarinet sounds without the 7the overtone (et al.)? Come on....
//
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Member Areas
- The Lounge
- John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part III