Yes, and by so doing he demonstrates again and again that he does not understand the words he uses.RNMarsh said:
We have tried correcting him, but he doesn't listen. Basic errors do matter, because they can be a sign of basic misunderstanding which means that deductions made from them will be wrong too. Joe is not the expert who occasionally does a typo or gets a sign wrong in a piece of algebra; Joe gets elementary things wrong over and over again and brushes away any attempt at teaching him.
Perhaps by listening to almost any basic electricity course? It is a term often introduced when discussing motors, but also arises when thinking about inductors. Joe misuses the term by lumping together anything which is not part of the DC resistance and calling it 'back emf impedance'.
I saw and heard the new Purifi's 6.5 " woofer in a two way and it sounds excellent. Very impressive distortion figures. They really got onto something with their innovative motor assembly.
Understood, no evidence to show.
I was pulling your Barkhausen leg and you got the bait. Sorry for missing the sarcasm emoticon
.
I must admit to have no idea what part of my post (or what post) could lead to this reaction?!
I wasn't talking about Scott nor did I question the use of such relays in ATE; in fact I did quite the contrary (implicitely though).....
Excellent... look forward to hearing it too!
Fair enough - what's getting switched?
FWIW, when my system is, ahem, finished... it's optical connections and only one source (server) so.... 🙂
The "FUD shouter" is back; after curing his bloody nose (and obviously eager to get a new one) . 🙂
As I meant with "in any case" "not in each and every case" there is - as usual - no reason for "FUD-shouting" ...... 😉
You really have to wonder about his motivation and mental health.
Pavel,
I suspect Thevenin and Norton would allow one to design a current drive mode crossover. It would probably be different than the common designs. But quite simply not worth the effort. Folks like JBL professional do make powered loudspeakers that at one time were a significant part of their business. I know the guys who designed the original ones. The went so far as to make the woofer basket part of the enclosure. With such a ground up design they went with voltage driven! Probably due to the experience and vast body of knowledge as to how to tweak things.
These days the bean counters prefer to buy from offshore contractors units made of conventional parts.
Now as you know there is a very easy way to avoid all sound system distortions. But it is a secret! So don't mention it.
It can be. On the other hand, DAC3 or better performing dac channels and AHB2 performance level power amplifies have a cost, at least for those who have considerations of that nature involved in their overall system design decisions.
In addition, digitally separating DSD into crossover bands is not nearly so simple. If we standardized on a distribution format of something like DXD, then used digital crossovers followed by DSD modulators it could work. Not all that cheap and easy though.
Yeah, is there actually any other way to compare audio products that duplicates home usage ?.
Ummm, yeah regularly, comparisons of AC filtering, AC cables, signal cables, speaker cables, data cables, DAC's, BT transmitters, BT receivers, capacitors, resistors etc and much more......using all manner of music types, performances and recording qualities.
During this period I am very deliberately exploring system level stuff that is plug and play and representative/applicable to standard systems, I have done my share of soldering iron dependent designs, constructions, improvements and tweaks etc since forever, this is different angle of investigation.
And so how about you, what is your level and experience of experimentation and what music apart from Benny Goodman ?.
Dan.
Ed, I believe they made it with a voltage drive. A proper electromechanical design, right. You know I was speaking about conventional dynamic speakers.
Btw, what Bruno is doing is to restrict unnecessary LF cone excursion for a specific speaker.
Btw, what Bruno is doing is to restrict unnecessary LF cone excursion for a specific speaker.
As "FUD shouting" comes right from the playbook of eristics, one has to decide if it is about "debate winning" (and not caring about what is correct) or is it about "truth seeking/finding" .
Of course these tricks are kind of fad; for some time it was to be the first who said "Dunning-Kruger", others tried to establish the method of being the first to mention "sea lioning" and for others it is "FUD shouting".
So the "FUD shouting" has no place in a honest discussion.....
Not invented here, not important........
Maybe Mr Behringer listened to you..... 😉.
And seeing there is discussion about electronic crossovers this is the Behringer solution....
How is the DAC-3 sounding now, worthwhile approach/technique ?.
Dan.
Last edited:
I wouldn't consider it FUD, exactly. If I decided to comment on it I would suggest there is something wrong with a system if that symptom were to occur.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.