He said they were converging as they become more and mite linear. Just like two extremely low noise, low distortion amps are going to have infinitesimal differences in their common pass bands.
What does that word mean to you? Are there materials which are not "quantum"?
Until you define "quantum materials", yes I do.
Who told you that? Quantum mechanics is pure mathematics, there is no magic involved. Read a book!
My concern is that some will attack what was taught simply because it may not support predetermined notions. "While I am an engineer, those who do not agree must be retrained...."
I find that emc, ground loop theory stuff wasn't taught back in the late 70's, but it is firmly grounded in e/m theory taught then. I guess I could take the "high road" and say theory back then is inadequate... But that would not be accurate. It certainly was, but the application wasn't done.
The degree is about learning the fundamentals so you can apply them.
Jn
But I did with my own money. More importantly there were the claims of "quantum" improvement of anything even the cheapest computer monitor just by proximity. Nothing, and visual things are far easier to A/B. BTW there are Bybee distributers in countries on the list of where a lot of hi-tech IC's are banned for export. The military secrets thing was a nonsense from day one.
Capacitors of different types tend to exhibit different amounts of 3HD. Mylar are the highest, teflon have a little, and PP have like none.
You can also simply google "quantum materials." Yes, I'm sure that book will reveal the mysteries of our Universe. I have a physics degree BTW.
Edit: nezbleu realized his post was nonsensical and deleted it, so now mine doesn't make sense. Or does it? He denied existence of quantum material.
Edit: nezbleu realized his post was nonsensical and deleted it, so now mine doesn't make sense. Or does it? He denied existence of quantum material.
Last edited:
I don't know Bybee personally, so all this military secret stuff, I really don't care about. It's not something that you or I will definitively know. But if you listened to the Bybees and did not hear a difference, that's perfectly fine.
If one capacitor results in better sound quality to me than another in my application,
then that's the capacitor that I'll use, if it is otherwise acceptable. Of course,
two equivalent versions of a component will differ in various details, since they
are not identical, and made in the same process on the same equipment. But,
we don't need to know everything, or make our own electronic parts like people
did a century ago. We can (and generally must) make decisions at a practical level.
Last edited:
Hang on a second I just posted a few days ago that different speakers were obvious to me from 15yr old memories of what different design philosophies were.
This is far different from wire directionality, etc. What is a quantum material and how do I tell one, your comment sounds grounded in the pop physics that pollutes the web these days. Headline, lab experiment on 100 atoms of such and such carried out at 4 degrees Kelvin and 10 Teslas of magnetic field might soon lead to a revolutionary new battery technology.
For starters, isn't something like graphene a quantum material? Bybee cocoon needs to be tested to see what it's made of. Otherwise the mystery will remain.
Maybe it's made out of semimetal, like the T-1000?
Last edited:
What does-it means ? A stupid approach. But less than Instruments only no ears for an "audio" gear ;-)
Do-you buy your photo lenses just reading their MTF ?
Last edited:
nezbleu shows no deleted posts dating back to March 15. Please stick to the facts if you wish to avoid Moderator action.
Eyes only of course, just like you buy an eyepiece for a telescope (I don't do photography). I have to admit it involves peeking. Why do you insinuate asking for an ears only test is the same as making a bunch of measurements and insisting that they determine what sounds better?
For that matter why is amateur astronomy so different from audio, male dominated hobby full of geeks but it more clearly comes down to the money and real performance. No one sells bags of magic pebbles to tie to your focuser to make the images "come alive".
I can only conclude you have no clue about what you are talking about.
Last edited:
I’m sure I’m missing something very basic here, what is a “physics degree” on your side of the pond?
- Status
- Not open for further replies.