Listening with my big system, I refund some localisation. But kind of blurred: I need instinctively to approach the speakers, near in the middle between them. And there, it is even better than with my headphones. Weird.
In fact, on my PC i had some kind of 3D effect processor in service, removing-it, it is like on my big system. Localisation is back with the binaural. Need here too a very opened angle.
The way it fulfill the space is interesting.
Last edited:
Which, depending on your appreciation of large crowds and their behaviour, may be a good thing. A very good thing. I still like moshpittable music.....
Plus, much modern music is established in the studio. Subsequently, musicians use all kinds of tricks like clickers to get the exact same sound on stage. The sound in your living room is the original.
So for musical experience, not going there may be a auditory blessing and save you on hospital bills.
The Europeans (Fraunhofer) pulled this car, of course with lots of international inputs/ facilitation, also from Johnston. Try making your place great again while leaving history intact
.Looks very very interesting, I've bookmarked Miwon for further listening study.
The world is full of wonderful music.
Thank you. ToS
Lots of wonderful music.
A bit Kraftwerky maybe? I remember buying The Durutti Column's The Guitar and Other Machines purely on a record review saying that it sounded like a cross between Kraftwerk and Dire Straits
Think and recall, those are what goes on in your head, just like imagination.
Nice try, Jakob1863 on other forum.
Noted, that you seemed to be unable to repeat your "point" .....
As you´ve cited, "think" and "recall" are indeed there to indicate that i could have been wrong.
Compare it to your statements.
Furthermore, isn´t it outright hilarious that you of all people are constantly trying to "sell" your purely subjective "interpretations" as facts?
Fans of surrealism must truly love some of these forum discussions.......
It was quite a good analogy, I could see where he was coming from.
Can anyone recommend album/recording review sites?
Another DBLT result is busted... cant hear phase effects --
yes, you can;
View attachment 567.pdf
[AES vol 61 no.11, 2013 nov]
THx-RNMarsh
yes, you can;
View attachment 567.pdf
[AES vol 61 no.11, 2013 nov]
THx-RNMarsh
Last edited:
Still they must be fans of running gags too.
Dupont and Dupond (AKA Thompson and Thomson) are in my ignore list ;-)
Last edited:
Seemed to you, meaning that it's in your own mind.
Can you state that Jakob1863 on other forum is definitely not you?As you´ve cited, "think" and "recall" are indeed there to indicate that i could have been wrong.
Compare it to your statements.
Furthermore, isn´t it outright hilarious that you of all people are constantly trying to "sell" your purely subjective "interpretations" as facts?
Fans of surrealism must truly love some of these forum discussions.......
What we hear in terms of phase distortion in hi fi reproduction has a long history. For over a century is was asserted that the ear was phase deaf. This was known as "Ohms Law of Acoustics". Haven't heard it lately have you? Still, back in history, like 1940, Paul Klipsch believed it (and continued to believe it until his death) and it made his K-horn seem more accurate than it really was. It was only with further research from Bell Labs and others (often disputed) that phase sensitivity became acceptable to audio design engineers. Richard Heyser was one of the first to write about it in AES lectures and in the JAES. Back in those days, 60's-70's, one could submit their findings an AES Convention, without the criticism and back-biting that usually happens today. In fact, that was the real reason the AES was formed: To allow engineers to put forth their ideas and measurements without a lot of interference from academic critics (often known for their closed mindedness). Alas, this venue was lost in the 80's when Dr. Lipshitz et al took over the AES publications. It has never been very useful ever since to an audio design engineer since then, because the censorship has gotten too strong and the requirements to even make a statement have become too stringent to bother trying. If conditions were different, phase problems would be more documented.
So you have the results from your own formal tests to present? Informal sighted testing as usual?
- Status
- Not open for further replies.