Hi Robert,
You are kidding me - right?
You do know that most of us accept that you can hear differences between equipment, but we also trust our measurements. The only problems I can see you having is when the claims get too far off the reservation. We do need some repeatable proofs to accept any claim. That is certainly not ignoring anyone or anything. It is the safety mechanism that prevents the industry from being overrun with false claims. In fact, the industry is awash in products with very dubious claims for performance.
So what reasonable requests that "we" make annoy or upset you?
-Chris
You are kidding me - right?
You do know that most of us accept that you can hear differences between equipment, but we also trust our measurements. The only problems I can see you having is when the claims get too far off the reservation. We do need some repeatable proofs to accept any claim. That is certainly not ignoring anyone or anything. It is the safety mechanism that prevents the industry from being overrun with false claims. In fact, the industry is awash in products with very dubious claims for performance.
So what reasonable requests that "we" make annoy or upset you?
-Chris
Don't forget your tinfoil hat while exploring, helps to protect from that wireless EMR.
I take it you are unaware of the attacks on diplomatic personnel in Cuba and China. Tin foil hats probably would have prevented the redulting brain damage.
You're aware it's just one unproven theory with no evidence, right?
Scientists and doctors zap theory that microwave weapon injured Cuba diplomats - The Washington Post
Knowing what I now know, wearing an aluminium foil hat is the very last thing I would do, ditto drinking or eating from aluminium cans or packaging.
Dan.
Yes, especially in those iPhone-audio memory location based listening tests.
Sigh...
Microwaves explain some of the symptoms, but not all.
Acrylic goggles are required to prevent the brain injuries.
Jn
I don't think there is direct metallic contact in most packaging these days anyway. I survived the Patio Mexican TV dinners of the 60's that would dissolve the container.
You say that, yet you ended up designing ICs, not discretes! Shame!
(ducks and runs...)
Howie
I would think the opposite, deciding what effect or amount of sweetening distortion is best could become very frustrating.
An interesting read, thanks for the link.
When reading this, I found that it was far too vague. It certainly does not support the possibility that microwaves were used in Cuba or China.
However, the most important actual hard fact I found was located on the first page lower left.
The paper is copyrighted by the "cellular phone task force"
Sounds really high faultin, right? Look up the founder of that organization, Arthur Firstenberg, as well as his history.
Jn
Last edited:
- Status
- Not open for further replies.