Not the same thing. That is pre-compiled Sharc data which varies by power amp model and the MCU/DSP-processor combination it has inside.
REW data are speaker measurements before filters have been designed.
Last edited:
So, could you record some cymbal hits that we could analyse for spectrum, rise times etc?
At 24/192+ and then down it to 16/44 and then make a physical CD. You will have 3 ways to compare. and mess around with different hard/software.
-RNM
Last edited:
With headphones, each ear gets exactly what is in the specific channel. Lateralization is strictly one to one, and central image is within the head.
In localization, each ear gets the signal same way at first, but then after a small delay, each ear gets the other channel information. And the image projects in front of us.
If an absorbent septum were placed in the recording studio, the mix would be more like headphones.
Jn
Raw data. OMG What a nightmare. Enough to do EQ, Xover, slopes, GD and timing delays?
But, my gear actually exits to do it now. Unless, you are volunteering? I am sure the Audio-Video-Movie industry would love to buy it.
THx-Richard
Last edited:
Yes. Although not raw data exactly, REW is a program that can import and graphically display the data. It can be used to help design better quality DSP.
Sort of. For the existing Crown amps the DSP only works internally with 24/96 PCM, and the internal DAC is not good, neither is the ADC. If you removed the DSP board from the power amp, found the I2S signals and hooked up a better dac to there, then if you also used high-quality resampling of all digital music to 24/96 and sent it to the DSP board through AES/EBU, then you would have something that could connect to some better sounding power amps. Otherwise, the existing data that was downloaded from JBL is not of great use, IMHO.
It would have to be another project down the road. Don't have a finished SOA 4-channel dac yet
Last edited:
The one area that headphone do not translate well onto speakers is the bass. There is a tendency to record with headphones more bass to get similar feel of bass balance than you would with speakers. Then played thru speakers it is too much bass.
Not a frequency response issue, either.
-RNM
Last edited:
Also the psychoacoustic effect of direct sound & room reflection signals impinging on the various & unique pinnae surfaces in each person's ear.
Richard,
Yes, a Sharc chip. They use biquad filters mostly or for everything. The biquads in later Crown amps have different curves than the old Crown amp that was used for M2 development. JBL never redid the filter coefficients for newer Crown amps, as a result the newer amps actual response curves don't match the speakers as well as the original did.
Yes, a Sharc chip. They use biquad filters mostly or for everything. The biquads in later Crown amps have different curves than the old Crown amp that was used for M2 development. JBL never redid the filter coefficients for newer Crown amps, as a result the newer amps actual response curves don't match the speakers as well as the original did.
Last edited:
Of course hi res is better. I give you link that record cymbal sound in hi res.
But you can not hear the different from low res is your hearing ability
May be you are too old.
TBH I can't see how any of that would help with serious critical listening. Perhaps what you define as serious critical listening is personal and for others headphones would be better?
Guess all you want. It's still free to do so even in your new place of residence, I guess.
And you know this from your pseudo objective comparison experiment?
(gasp) You just attacked him. It doesn't sit well with some forum members. You should stop 
By using the listening method that you refuse to use, DBT.
Wow x2, as if forum member cbdb is on your ignore list or as if you have forgotten the flaws with your experiment that he listed.
And you know this from your pseudo objective comparison experiment?
:
and does your own pseudo objective comparison say other wise?
-RNM
I have no idea which is older and which is newer. So, this doesnt help me.
In measurments of the acoustic output, it is very good filter/xover. So does that mean I have the better matching filters to the M2?
But, if it was not, I can measure M2 myself. Or rather, i have a newly minted MS EE here (USA) who is up on the current dsp stuff. But. It needs a new PA more than anything else. IMO At least it isnt 16/44.
THx-Richard
Last edited:
I sincerely hope that this year researchers will find a remedy for your strange orphan disease, or at least that an anesthetic, without too many negative effects, will reduce the pain it causes you and that you will find peace and joy.
YouTube
Last edited:
Here, from another high-SR (i.e. anything above 60kHz SR) party pooper
Gearslutz - View Single Post - The Optimal Sample Rate for Quality Audio
http://lavryengineering.com/pdfs/lavry-sampling-oversampling-imaging-aliasing.pdf
http://lavryengineering.com/pdfs/lavry-sampling-theory.pdf
http://www.lavryengineering.com/pdfs/lavry-white-paper-the_optimal_sample_rate_for_quality_audio.pdf
George
Bill was absolutely correct in putting that there’s nothing wrong with “bubbles”.stopcorrectingattacking others and let them continue to live in their own bubble.
But it may and often will irritate when the bubble owner starts Christianizing forum members with unconfirmed or dead wrong “bubble truth”
How’s that for a new word to be added to the dictionary
Hans
Hi George,
Thank you for providing these links.
Especially the last one is nice and compact in covering all important issues.
Hans
Would have to look around to see where the info I have/had on that is located. Don't think it was specific about amp model numbers though.
If you have EEs that are recent graduates maybe they have some DSP training. If so, maybe they could figure out how to use REW, Re-phase, and or Foobar2000 convolution to do something you might be interested in.
Some possible links of interest:
REW - Room EQ Wizard Room Acoustics Software
rePhase - Official Site - Free FIR filtering tool
foo_dsp_xover
Think I sent you a link to my M2 collection of data before, but I could send it again, or maybe just the REW data?
EDIT: Sorry, data is actually in Re-Phase format.
Last edited:
- Status
- Not open for further replies.