yes, but if we are talking the vendetta JC signature ltd edition you can afford slightly higher prices. If making 100 of something then plenty of places will run that off and may even be just as cheap to stay onshore.
You may well be right! 🙂
I once spoke to a manufacturer on the Isle of Wight, he said it was a great place, as an island it was a cheap labour zone.....
I once spoke to a manufacturer on the Isle of Wight, he said it was a great place, as an island it was a cheap labour zone.....
One of our sidelines is organising mainly board manufacture and assembly, less often full assembly to create a full finished product. Can be very stressful especially sourcing components etc. Procurement is another area that firms are starting to out-source as the cost of permanent purchasing staff etc. increases, or the size of the business does not justify having such departments within the company structure... Outsourcing is becoming increasingly popular.
Audio is an interesting field, you have basic components that have to be sold at the best price due to competition, the further up the scale you go the greater the price and profit margin per product but the less sold.
Audio is an interesting field, you have basic components that have to be sold at the best price due to competition, the further up the scale you go the greater the price and profit margin per product but the less sold.
Thanks I might consider it, model number (I really wanted a JC model though)? Also right now without a schematic I'm not sure I want to invest the time troubleshooting.
We are clearly talking past each other at this point. Did I not state that triangle/tetrad protocols enjoy greater statistical power? That's exactly what comes out of the abstract and makes solid statistical/experimental sense. I admitted I didn't know the official name, but I've done enough other testing where you need positive and negative controls.
Both are infinitely better than a simple XY test.
Anyhow, it's bad enough getting people to do remotely robust testing and we're arguing even more specific protocols.
A very good article on investigating "RF Effects on Audio" by Cyril Bateman in Electronics World June 1997.
THx-RNMarsh
THx-RNMarsh
off-topic, or maybe on-topic, but probably meta-topic....
for some reason, this post (from elsewhere) made me think of this thread....
1 to change the light bulb and to post that the light bulb has been changed.
14 to share similar experiences of changing light bulbs and how the light bulb could have been changed differently.
7 to caution about the dangers of changing light bulbs.
6 to argue over whether it's "lightbulb" or "light bulb".
Another 6 to condemn those 6 as stupid.
2 industry professionals to inform the group that the proper term is "lamp".
15 know-it-alls who claim they were in the industry, and that "light bulb" is perfectly correct.
19 to post that this forum is not about light bulbs and to please take this discussion to a light bulb forum.
11 to defend the posting to this forum saying that we all use light bulbs and therefore the posts are relevant to this forum.
36 to debate which method of changing light bulbs is superior, where to buy the best light bulbs, what brand of light bulbs work best for this technique and what brands are faulty.
5 People to post pics of their own light bulbs.
15 People to post "I can't see S$%^!" and their own light bulbs.
7 to post URL's where one can see examples of different light bulbs.
4 to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly and then post the corrected URL's.
13 to link all posts to date, quote them in their entirety including all headers and signatures, and add "Me too".
5 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the light bulb controversy.
4 to say "Didn't we go through this already a short time ago?".
13 to say "Do a search on light bulbs before posting questions about light bulbs".
1 to bring politics into the discussion by adding that Julia or Tony aren't the brightest bulb.
4 more to get into personal attacks over their political views.
1 moderator to lock the light bulb thread.
1 forum lurker to respond to the original post 6 months from now.
//found on A little light humour - Page 72 - audio-talk
for some reason, this post (from elsewhere) made me think of this thread....
How many Forum members does it take to change a light bulb?
1 to change the light bulb and to post that the light bulb has been changed.
14 to share similar experiences of changing light bulbs and how the light bulb could have been changed differently.
7 to caution about the dangers of changing light bulbs.
6 to argue over whether it's "lightbulb" or "light bulb".
Another 6 to condemn those 6 as stupid.
2 industry professionals to inform the group that the proper term is "lamp".
15 know-it-alls who claim they were in the industry, and that "light bulb" is perfectly correct.
19 to post that this forum is not about light bulbs and to please take this discussion to a light bulb forum.
11 to defend the posting to this forum saying that we all use light bulbs and therefore the posts are relevant to this forum.
36 to debate which method of changing light bulbs is superior, where to buy the best light bulbs, what brand of light bulbs work best for this technique and what brands are faulty.
5 People to post pics of their own light bulbs.
15 People to post "I can't see S$%^!" and their own light bulbs.
7 to post URL's where one can see examples of different light bulbs.
4 to post that the URL's were posted incorrectly and then post the corrected URL's.
13 to link all posts to date, quote them in their entirety including all headers and signatures, and add "Me too".
5 to post to the group that they will no longer post because they cannot handle the light bulb controversy.
4 to say "Didn't we go through this already a short time ago?".
13 to say "Do a search on light bulbs before posting questions about light bulbs".
1 to bring politics into the discussion by adding that Julia or Tony aren't the brightest bulb.
4 more to get into personal attacks over their political views.
1 moderator to lock the light bulb thread.
1 forum lurker to respond to the original post 6 months from now.
//found on A little light humour - Page 72 - audio-talk
Scott,
Model # HCA1200. Now that I'm thinking about it I wonder if it was just the output Zobel that fried? Perhaps I should have taken a look at it before I put it away and never looked at it again. I didn't have a transistor tester so never checked any of the output trannies. I would assume that John would have the schematic or could get his hands on same.
Model # HCA1200. Now that I'm thinking about it I wonder if it was just the output Zobel that fried? Perhaps I should have taken a look at it before I put it away and never looked at it again. I didn't have a transistor tester so never checked any of the output trannies. I would assume that John would have the schematic or could get his hands on same.
4 Little Helpers for Gyro Pass
(I'd be afraid they would start to move when all lights are off)
- Status
- Not open for further replies.