Well, >100 dB ref full output is achievable. What I don't think you get is 90 dB (say) at 1 W output (~2.8 V into 8 ohms) and then your full entitlement at full output (say 60 V out) of >120 dB because ripple shoots up, IR issues in the ground wiring arise etc. Once you start delivering power into the load, life gets a bit more difficult.
(time for AFEC 😀)
yes,all true. for home music, as my qualifier, (not stadium sound systems), typical average power output is much lower than full power and I would use that lower number (1-10W/8) for these comparisons.
That number - 100 - keeps coming up. I use it for THD, S/N, dynamic range, psr -- if all better than 100 you are good to go. But it can be less and still very satisfactory.
THx-RNMarsh
Last edited:
Sure, and with akg's latest chips, you get volume control built-in and a v-out dac at that level for pretty good money (provided you can squeeze the performance out). There are a number of amps on this board that will hit that -100 pretty easy.
So, speakers, eh? 😀
So, speakers, eh? 😀
Well that was fun.... SY is correct but wrong, as usual. Missed the point for the more narrow tech call.
Yes, that darned engineering approach. How silly of me. And the answer is 18.36 inches.
Re how far to go with this thing. You have to be pragmatic here. If you have an amp that has 1% distortion and an S/N of 60 dB, why would to build a super low noise, high reg PSU - the benefit is completely swamped by amplifier issues. Ditto the reverse situation. Indeed you do have to look at this from the systems level so, that's why my guidance is as described in my earlier post.
Nope. Any amp like that will sound better with a low noise PSU. Distortion generated by the amp doesn't sound the same as noise from PSU/AC. And hearing a little noise with your ear to the speaker says about nothing of how the music will sound.
I love string theory. Is that length before or after compactification?Yes, that darned engineering approach. How silly of me. And the answer is 18.36 inches.
Going off at a tangent for a second.
Warren TenBrook's Summary of Head Measurements at Harman | InnerFidelity
Data is still being analysed but some really interesting stuff regarding headphone target curves based off measurements in the Harman reference room. Yet none of the modern headphone amps have key adjustments to get this right. It seems accepted that you do it in the digital domain...
Warren TenBrook's Summary of Head Measurements at Harman | InnerFidelity
Data is still being analysed but some really interesting stuff regarding headphone target curves based off measurements in the Harman reference room. Yet none of the modern headphone amps have key adjustments to get this right. It seems accepted that you do it in the digital domain...
Nope. Any amp like that will sound better with a low noise PSU. Distortion generated by the amp doesn't sound the same as noise from PSU/AC. And hearing a little noise with your ear to the speaker says about nothing of how the music will sound.
Where did you pull this from, man?
So you can discriminate, with your ears, between distortion and PSU artifacts greater than 90 dB down ref 1 W out or 100 W?
Last edited:
Where did you pull this from, man?
So you can discriminate, with your ears, between distortion and PSU artifacts greater than 90 dB down?
Noise is always there. So the threshold really depends on system gain and acoustic noise floor.
Hmm aren't we in danger of going down the rabbit hole of noise you can hear in an otherwise silent room late at night with your ear near the speaker vs noise that you can hear below ppp passages in music? Whilst I hate the hearing noise gates coming in and out on older studio recordings having silly low noise floor in domestic environment doesn't seem to be worth chasing?
Yes, that darned engineering approach. How silly of me. And the answer is 18.36 inches.
OK. Are you done with that useless diatribe? [no further useless knee-jerk diatribe response is needed, thank you]
This whole question came about during the VFA vs CFA discussion about what are the differences. It was pointed out how 'inferior' the psrr is of the CFA compared to VFA (high gnfb). As JC and myself and others have noted more than once, it doesnt really matter a lot if you have super high PSRR. You can get the desired end result several ways.
THx-RNMarsh
Last edited:
On the flipside, there's absolutely nothing magical about a CFA as the output stage largely limits your capabilities regardless. You know, there's several ways to a desired end result.
And we could go into the useless diatribe about sound of different topologies again...
And we could go into the useless diatribe about sound of different topologies again...
Is there a new definition of PSRR being used here as I like some others are confused at its discussion in isolation? And confession, I did start off as a systems engineer as a grad so I can't stop thinking that way, at least when sober.
On the flipside, there's absolutely nothing magical about a CFA as the output stage largely limits your capabilities regardless. You know, there's several ways to a desired end result.
..
yes, as we all discovered... mostly recently thru SIM. However, there is the actual CFA operating mode that wasnt (still?) fully understood. But, all in all it is what we need, audibly, that we can design to.
THx-RNMarsh
Where did you pull this from, man?
So you can discriminate, with your ears, between distortion and PSU artifacts greater than 90 dB down ref 1 W out or 100 W?
Artefacts are rare, very, even among barely half-way well engineered equipment.
The effect of noise on the sound however is not. You don't hear PSU noise (generally) unless something is broken, but you hear the affect it has on the music.
It's not hard to tell. Filter power in anyway before it makes it to a 1% distortion, 90db s/n, amplification section and you'll notice it changes.
Sorry, I put this in the same category as being able to diagnose diseases with 23&me. Not happening.
Sorry, I put this in the same category as being able to diagnose diseases with 23&me. Not happening.
1*Never claimed diagnoses.
2*Go try it and then report back.
OK. Are you done with that useless diatribe? [no further useless knee-jerk diatribe response is needed, thank you]
This whole question came about during the VFA vs CFA discussion about what are the differences. It was pointed out how 'inferior' the psrr is of the CFA compared to VFA (high gnfb). As JC and myself and others have noted more than once, it doesnt really matter a lot if you have super high PSRR. You can get the desired end result several ways.
And I was naively wondering where is this urge for an "audible" PSRR number coming from. Now I get it, it's coming from the same advent of excusing your pet basic amplifier topology for any poor performance metric.
2*Go try it and then report back.
Ok, I tried and can't confirm your findings. Now what, it's your word against mine.
However, there is the actual CFA operating mode that wasnt (still?) fully understood.
Huh? David Nelson wants to know more about.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Member Areas
- The Lounge
- John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part II