Call and ask for shipping to Russia (no problems). 😉
Why are we talking about copper resistivity? Surely it has been determined that all we require for audio purposes is conductivity somewhat better than mud?
I actually rated the mud more highly than the steel wool.... salt water was crap though. 😛
Tony.
The price is right....
The price is right... for the manufacturer that is 😀
The price is right... for the manufacturer that is 😀
Yes, a contributor to Jan's publication, like you.
A dangerous course John. By that reasoning you will conclude that whoever isn't published in Linear Audio is not very trustworthy/convincing.🙂
Jan
Yes, a contributor to Jan's publication, like you.
I hope Jan doesn't let him talk about wires. 😉
I hope Jan doesn't let him talk about wires. 😉
If he replays that bad skin effect paper, I'll be writing a letter to the editor.
jn
So John, what journal was van den Hul's work published in again? I seem to have missed your answer the first time.
se
se
That was the point WE (the Phone company) appeared to stress ( no pun intended) .Plus annealing improves the flex life of the wire.
se
So John, what journal was van den Hul's work published in again? I seem to have missed your answer the first time.
se
The Journal of Irreproducible Results
jn
Nope, he wrote about analog filters.If he replays that bad skin effect paper, I'll be writing a letter to the editor.
jn
If I remember correctly wasn't the Vandenhul wire based on a carbon fiber or carbon impregnated wire. He gave me a set at one of the CES shows, they looked like spark plug wires, I gave them away soon after.
I was actually wanting to maximize skin effect in a conductor for experiments. I chose graphite pencil lead since it had appreciable resistance and the thickest conductors have the widest skin-effect region.
However I couldn't measure skin effect in it at all! I was quite sure I wan't doing it wrong. I had a resistor I was comparing it against. I figured it might be because it wasn't a homogeneous conductor, so I decided I'd try nichrome wire next. I don't have any though.
However I couldn't measure skin effect in it at all! I was quite sure I wan't doing it wrong. I had a resistor I was comparing it against. I figured it might be because it wasn't a homogeneous conductor, so I decided I'd try nichrome wire next. I don't have any though.
Also, what about plating a conductor with a RESISTIVE material, so that it's lossy at RF? This might help with RFI. I'd sure like to see something like that. It would be like a big long L//R except it would also help with the resonance modes of the cable.
Keantoken, other way around. You want high conductivity to maximize skin effect.
But the equations I found only described skin effect as a multiplier for the resistance of the cable, independent of the resistance itself.
If I remember correctly wasn't the Vandenhul wire based on a carbon fiber or carbon impregnated wire. He gave me a set at one of the CES shows, they looked like spark plug wires, I gave them away soon after.
Did you try them ..?
A.Wayne,
Of course I did. Couldn't tell them apart from a set of cheap Radio Shack connectors. Perhaps I didn't break them in long enough or I had them turned around and the electrons were going in the wrong direction. 😀
Of course I did. Couldn't tell them apart from a set of cheap Radio Shack connectors. Perhaps I didn't break them in long enough or I had them turned around and the electrons were going in the wrong direction. 😀
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Member Areas
- The Lounge
- John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part II