John Curl's Blowtorch preamplifier part II

Status
Not open for further replies.

No. I didnt go thru all... as long as they showed some real distortion data for DIYAudio non-believers, it is good for my purpose. I already made a lot of driver distortion measurements. Remember this started as comment re Geddes.

But, I never save data and write about it. Just doing it for my own knowledge and curiosity.

-Richard
 
Last edited:
It is easy to do test again or do a before and after test. But I never have any audio or speakers That long to want to keep archive its data. But, I should not say Never - that is an exaggeration. But with computers, I do save something unusual or novel or other wise interesting. But it isnt much.

I just agitated about speaker disortion because of Geddes comment....

Would like to discuss more about the importance of less wide dispersion and CD.



-RNM
 
Last edited:
On that speaker, yes.
Ditto for another one that data is provided (see pages 34, 35)
https://www.klippel.de/fileadmin/kl...ervice/Measurement Service Report example.pdf

But it’s not safe to generalise (a good reason to use your AP to test a large sample of drivers)

Only the agitation part.
Remains the constructive one.

George

I would not assume ALL do that but most do.

yes. Now its up to others who are interested to measure their speaker distortions and do more study of distortion and dispersion effects and CD.

In the process, (this is the constructive part) you will find out for yourself why JBL M2 is exceptional and accurate system. I have already said why IMHO.


THx-RNMarsh
 
Last edited:
Now its up to others who are interested to measure their speaker distortions and do more study of distortion and dispersion effects and CD.
In the process, (this is the constructive part) you will find out for yourself why JBL M2 is exceptional and accurate system. I have already said why IMHO.

Richard, are there any distortion vs frequency and vs signal level diagrams published for the drivers of the M2 ?

George
 
I have some ideas on how to simulate this without impossible maths.

Hi Scott
Unless you want to sharpen your pencil 😉 from what I have seen in Klippel, ALMA and other research entities papers, the simulated and the experimental data points match quite well. The loudspeaker model they have developed can be utilised.
As usual the issue is in assigning realistic values on the model components.

https://www.klippel.de/fileadmin/kl...urement of Loudspeaker Suspension_Klippel.pdf

https://www.klippel.de/fileadmin/kl...linearities?Causes,Parameters,Symptoms_06.pdf

https://medias.ircam.fr/media/slideshows/2015/11/26/AntoninNovak_2015.pdf

George
 
George, not that I could find with a lot of looking no reviews that do either. BTW Stereophile does not do (or rarely) these tests on speakers either.

Measurement data for the woofer 2216Nd 15

http://www.audioheritage.org/vbulletin/attachment.php?attachmentid=63736&d=1417800709

No data for the compression driver D2430K, only the applicable patent
DUAL COMPRESSION DRIVERS AND PHASING PLUGS FOR COMPRESSION DRIVERS


If one wants to purchase the drivers for testing😀
JBL 2216ND-1 Woofer for 4367 #320-0045-002 - Speaker Exchange
JBL D2430K Tweeter for JBL M2 #5032754X - Speaker Exchange


just trying to get a focus on the physical realities of the problem.

for this, I find the Klippel poster very informative (sorry for relinking)
https://www.klippel.de/fileadmin/_migrated/content_uploads/Klippel_Nonlinearity_Poster.pdf


George
 
Whoo! Six hundred bucks for the woofer, in proud JBL tradition. 🙂

Jim, take a trip to Mexico 😀

As for the CD: "M2 serial numbers are required to purchase." 😉

Hint for educational purposes only: Reverse engineering (modern route: 3D scan the real thing, send the file for 3D printing)

George
 

Attachments

  • Mex.PNG
    Mex.PNG
    16.9 KB · Views: 261
Status
Not open for further replies.