Yup. Just double checked it again. R8 is 680 K
Here is something else that seems strange to me. When I remove R9 from the circuit, it measures a perfect 1 M. Bands match the other 1 M resistors used elsewhere on the board. All is good and happy. When I measure it in circuit it reads erratically around 60 K.
Here is something else that seems strange to me. When I remove R9 from the circuit, it measures a perfect 1 M. Bands match the other 1 M resistors used elsewhere on the board. All is good and happy. When I measure it in circuit it reads erratically around 60 K.
When I measure it in circuit it reads erratically around 60 K.
That's a clue.... True in both channels? OK, pull the ECC88, leave the 6SN7 in, and measure the voltages to ground on pins 2 and 6.
Yes true in both channels. Pin 2 is 126.5 V ans pin 6 is 352Pin 7 is 118.2 V in case you were wanting both grid pins.
OK, those are the voltages with the ECC88 removed? If so, the voltage divider is working normally. You've got at least two possibilities: the ECC88 is bad, or it's oscillating at RF. If replacing the ECC88 has no effect, install a grid stopper resistor as close to each grid pin as possible. That will take an Exacto knife and a few minutes.
Well, I don't have another ECC88 to test with, so I will need to order up another. Do you think I should throw in a grid stopper in before I order up another tube? If so, what value should I try. I read 68 K somewhere is a place to start. I have some 75K in my box of parts.
Nothing that high. 1-5k should be fine. That was the intended function of the 1k resistor between the voltage divider and the grid.
I just probed the grid power with my scope and I saw no noise. I dropped the time resolution down as far as it would go and there was a tiny bit of hash, but nothing that would cause this kind of oscillation. I am guessing that the tube is bad.
So, I just ordered up a new Electroharmonics 6922. A bit of a bummer because the tube I was using was a nice vintage Tungsram from Parts Connexion. At least with the new Electroharmonics I will know it is not the tube if I have more issues.
The nasty thing about oscillations is that they can happen well above where many scopes can go, so you should still be suspicious. This is one disadvantage of ECC88-oids- they're effective at VHF. Try the stoppers at the grid pins and see what happens.
I added a 4.7 K resistor to the grid stopper. No change. It's strange to watch the voltage on the grid pin rise from 110 V to 150V as soon as the bulbs go out. We shall see what the new tube does.
I added a 4.7 K resistor to the grid stopper. No change. It's strange to watch the voltage on the grid pin rise from 110 V to 150V as soon as the bulbs go out. We shall see what the new tube does.
Do you have the transistors on the MAIDA power supply board "heat sinked"? Also, are you using the same transformer with the center-tapped filament?
I am using the allied transformer with the center tap and am using the power supply in the article. Yes I do have some little sinks on them. They aren't getting too hot.
I should have stated in my question, that if the devices aren't heat sinked the regulator gets itself into a bit of trouble. I had the voltages wander around owing to this factor.
I was not satisfied with an artificial center-tap on the original transformer I used -- and use the Allied one instead.
I was not satisfied with an artificial center-tap on the original transformer I used -- and use the Allied one instead.
Thanks for the ideas. Everyone.
Last night I turned the preamp on and immediately probed the gate pin. I watched as the bulbs went out, the voltage rose to 150 V. I think that would rule out heat in the regulator as it hadn't been on for more than a 30 seconds.
Last night I turned the preamp on and immediately probed the gate pin. I watched as the bulbs went out, the voltage rose to 150 V. I think that would rule out heat in the regulator as it hadn't been on for more than a 30 seconds.
Now, this same thing is seen in both channels?
You really have me curious now. If replacing the tube doesn't work, would you consider sending the preamp to me to look at?
You really have me curious now. If replacing the tube doesn't work, would you consider sending the preamp to me to look at?
Yes, both channels have been behaving identically. Sure I would send it out for help. That would be awesome. Thanks so much for the support.
I'm still working on it -- ran some tests today -- I think it tests a hair better than the author would admit to -- first chart is 20V out, second is 2.83 out:
I still have a little work to do getting some of the 60/120 Hz a.c. out -- the layout in the PAS chassis might be a little too cramped.
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
An externally hosted image should be here but it was not working when we last tested it.
I still have a little work to do getting some of the 60/120 Hz a.c. out -- the layout in the PAS chassis might be a little too cramped.
Yes, its "balanced to balanced" -- the only load on the preamp is the AP Analyzer. I'm using the Sowter transformers which will add a tad to the distortion. The input impedance needs some work as I have both ALPS volume and balanced pots which would be 100K||100K = 50K. I am using Electro Harmonix bottles.
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Pass Labs
- ImPasse Preamplifier