No, you just think you know what they do sonically.
No, you just think you know that he just thinks he knows what they do sonically. He knows.
No, you just think you know that he just thinks he knows what they do sonically. He knows.
Not at all. I know that he thinks it, because he stated it. I am also certain of the uncertainty in his knowledge. Quick quips won't get you off the hook either as I am still waiting for the numerous errant assumptions you stated I have made...
Moving on, hopefully. '-)
Why??? There are so many questions left unanswered!
Where is your rebuttal of Vanderkooy and Lipshitz contribution to the field? How do you propose Bybee devices could provide audible benefit? Are you afraid of rigour??? I welcome it, just as i would if you could find fault in my contributions, since that would lead to increasing my understanding (and possibly other contributors too).
And what does the quote say on your profile? "Condemnation without Examination is Prejudice". Might be an idea to remove that in case anyone thinks it is verging on the hypocritical...
Good song.“And you may find yourself
Living in a shotgun shack
And you may find yourself
In another part of the world
And you may find yourself
Behind the wheel of a large automobile
And you may find yourself in a beautiful house
With a beautiful wife
And you may ask yourself, well
How did I get here?”
YouTube
No, afraid of PR damage. It's the business decision.Are you afraid of rigour???
Again, your use of the word 'delusion' seems to be your own pet interpretation.
So just like the mythical 'decay tails'?
Here is the LTE in AA, from over 41 years ago:
Thank you for that, but it is not a rebuttal of anything.
So just like the mythical 'decay tails'?
Well understood in recording, even this place explains: Reverb Tail - Soundsnap Blog
Also discussed in four different sections at:
Cheat Sheet: Reverb Parameters - EMusician
Nothing mythical about what they are.
Well understood in recording, even this place explains: Reverb Tail - Soundsnap Blog
Also discussed in four different sections at:
Cheat Sheet: Reverb Parameters - EMusician
Nothing mythical about what they are.
Except your description on how different DACs handle them as if they are some unmeasurable parameter. What you have linked to there is something any sound card could resolve.
Remember you said
One of the DACs that loses low-level reverb tails is DAC-3. Measurements performed at Stereophile show ENOB = 21-bits. There are no missing bits as measured however Sterophile does it, and 21-bits is pretty much SOA.
It seems from my experiments with adjustments to dac registers and or AK4137 DSD sample rate, that reverb tail loss is linked to I2S/DSD clock jitter and or dac VCO jitter as function of DPLL bandwidth, at least for S-D dacs of the type most of the tested dacs are. Also, Allo Katana RPi hat DAC reproduces the tails pretty well
I'm afraid the links you posted don't to me tally with what you have said on here. but I admit to me decay is the 8 or so seconds the sound of a choir needs to fade out in a sizable chapel.
Nothing mythical about what they are.
Yes very clear, if they're missing they aren't there. What could be more clear than that, jitter does not make a DAC output signal disappear.
...jitter does not make a DAC output signal disappear.
One wouldn't expect so using a simple model of how jitter affects dacs. Sabre dac DPLL bandwidth has some interesting audible effects, however. No wonder ESS recommends to run it at the lowest stable value. My previously described observations and related suspicions remain unchanged. No effort to measure the effects have been done by me, either. The subject is of no further practical interest here, since a preferred (and better measuring) dac chip is now available from AKM.
It certainly doesn't appear to be. BTW, you are wasting your time asking about Bybees, I doubt you will get any meaningful answers, after all, how could you?Thank you for that, but it is not a rebuttal of anything.
That is an excellent pic
A flying bin of rubbish seemed very timely! (That's a flying can of trash for the non-English speaking contributors). But what do you see? A flying bin or a puddle in front of the bin? Most interesting to me is that even when you settle on one perception of reality, you can train yourself to see the other. Of more relevance to this thread, I wonder who here can state with certainty what the artist created?
Interestingly in thumbnail it looks to be floating as the resolution is lower. click on it and it (to me) is easier to see the reality.
But can you train yourself to see the other interpretation? Oddly looking at the screen from different directions seems to make a difference for me, so maybe there are some correlations made with the environment in which it is viewed?
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.
- Home
- Member Areas
- The Lounge
- If it's purely an engineering challenge why bother designing yet another DAC?