New measurement results for the PP self inverting output stage, this time with cathode current increased to force Class A operation. The results are much better.
But still looks like a proper phase inverter is a better choice.
The IMD tests are based on equal signals at 1.5 & 2 KHz.
But still looks like a proper phase inverter is a better choice.
The IMD tests are based on equal signals at 1.5 & 2 KHz.
Attachments
In the earlier work (reported three posts up from here) I found that an NFET vers (IRF840) did not work as well as the LM317 or Hammond 5H choke, even when returned to -22.4V. It didn't seem to make sense to try again.
Those I did try were significantly better.
At some future time I'll try a real phase inverter on this for comparison.
Those I did try were significantly better.
At some future time I'll try a real phase inverter on this for comparison.
Do you have EL84 to try? I suspect higher mu and gm may improve things. Then it's a trivial thing to DC couple a fet to the driver tube to try a concertina phase inverter with minimal changes at the drive voltages required.
I would probably want to try a ring-of-two bipolar cascode, or a cascoded DN2540 depletion set as a CCS, should be an order of magnitude better than a single fet or the 317.
I would probably want to try a ring-of-two bipolar cascode, or a cascoded DN2540 depletion set as a CCS, should be an order of magnitude better than a single fet or the 317.
Why will that improve the subject amp? And by how much?Do you have EL84 to try? I suspect higher mu and gm may improve things.
- Status
- This old topic is closed. If you want to reopen this topic, contact a moderator using the "Report Post" button.