I sliced my speaker cone!

The box internals have nothing to do with cone break-up at say 3-5 kHz, neither does chamfering.
At low frequencies there is a lot more air pressure inside the box than on the outside which is a set up where you don't want panels to vibrate making matters worse when cone break up arises. With reflex enclosures the internal air pressure can be regulated by flaring the ports - the same principle can be used for the inside of the hole for the speaker unit.
 
Member
Joined 2017
Paid Member
This has worked well in the past. Of course the people telling us how well this works, would never tell us what they actually use for glue. Here's an example of a very good result:

https://techtalk.parts-express.com/forum/tech-talk-forum/66754-how-to-train-your-pm180-8
Jbrunner - who did the experiments with the PM180 and his original thread https://techtalk.parts-express.com/forum/tech-talk-forum/61859-scan-speek-4-for-49-cents used DAP Alex Plus Clear claulk. I know he experimented with different adhesives and settled on this one.
 
The box internals have nothing to do with cone break-up at say 3-5 kHz, neither does chamfering.

Yes, cone resonance is a problem by itself, but 3-5" midrange drivers are very sensitive to cavity resonances at roughly 1-2 kHz frequency range without chamfering

http://www.troelsgravesen.dk/chamfer.htm
1640936179107.png
1640936214265.png
 
Member
Joined 2017
Paid Member
Despite the forum's prompt to start a new thread, I thought it made more sense to post this here where some other experiments have been posted. I sliced an SB16PFCR25-8 in a similar pattern to the revelator. I used DAP Alex Plus with Silicone Clear caulk. Because it was clear I could see light through the cone and wasn't sure if there was air leakage so I put some black Dynaflex caulk on the back just to make sure there was no air leak. I put a little bit of gloss Modge Podge on the cone and quickly wiped it off - not trying to add damping but just to make my ugly glue-job look better.

Sliced SB16PFC.jpg



Here is the stock driver from 0 to 75 degrees (15 degree increments)
Stock SPL.jpg



And here is the modified driver - greatly reducing the cone breakup at 5Khz and 6Khz
Sliced SPL.jpg



On-axis SPL of stock cone vs sliced cone
Woofer 1 Stock vs Sliced.jpg



Here is 3rd order distortion of the stock cone vs the sliced cone
Stock vs Sliced Distortion 3rd Order.jpg


Here is THD of stock cone vs sliced cone
Stock vs Sliced Distortion THD.jpg


Here is the woofer with a LR4 acoustic crossover in place
Voz Pacifica Woofer.png


woofer xo.png
 

Attachments

  • Woofer 2 Stock vs Sliced.jpg
    Woofer 2 Stock vs Sliced.jpg
    422 KB · Views: 27
  • Like
Reactions: 9 users
I always felt the 16PFCRs sounded very good in stock form. The ones I tested only had mild breakup around 4 - 5k, which was easy to tame by treating the surround junction with viscoelastic coating ie. tub and tile bathroom caulk (not silicone RTV). Otherwise this driver sounds as good as some $50 - $75 Seas stuff I've used before. Its a nice 2 way midbass which sounds very lively and engaging. Its just a little wimpy in the power handling department for my tastes, but great as a dedicated cone mid in OB.

I'm currently re-coning a set of PRV 6MR500-NDY and adding a phase plug. This driver has some significant breakup modes up top, but sounds really nice as a high efficiency midrange, so I'm trying to tame it up top and use a more shallow xover. Alot of junk comes from the sizzle added by the flimsy dustcap, hence I'm using a phase plug instead in hopes of also killing the pole cavity resonance.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Member
Joined 2017
Paid Member
Member
Joined 2017
Paid Member
Nice result! Will you make a pair, it would be cool to see consistency.

The "On-axis SPL of stock cone vs sliced cone" in the post above was my woofer #1, here is the same for woofer #2

Woofer 2 Stock vs Sliced.jpg


Here were the two stock (un-modified) woofers before I started.
Woofer 1 vs Woofer 2.jpg


Here is an actual speaker with a Lavoce TN131.00 tweeter, taken to InDIYana 2023 and Parts Expresss SDC2023.

Voz Pacifica Directivity (lines).png



This is the speaker, but the tweeter changed to a Peerless XT25SC40 since then. Ash Burl veneer and a DIY waveguide using a Yonico table edge router bit.

PXL_20231025_134124877.NIGHT.jpg



My objective conclusions: Slicing a paper cone woofer can reduce the cone breakup significantly as well as lower distortion.

Practical conclusion: This is mostly above the crossover. Reducing the cone breakup definitely makes designing the crossover easier, but its not clear that I couldn't get to the same place with more or different components.

Subjective conclusions: None. These sound good, but so do the stock SB16PFC woofers and I did not build a pair with stock woofers and a pair with sliced woofers to blind A-B test them.

But it was fun and I learned some things. And, oh yeah, this was just practice so that when I slice my Dayton PM180's I don't mess them up, as they were more expensive.