I don't believe cables make a difference, any input?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Haha I tried reading EnABL patent and I don't get it.

No worries, I don't get it either.

Does make it possible for a driver to exceed it's "break up" point with impunity, according to Lynn Olson this provides the equivalent of at least a 20db reduction in distortion of all kinds. And, it uncovers that below 40 db down zone that all of us are digging for. Makes full range drivers bell clear and allows multi-driver systems to become coherent and bell clear. Attached is a text file with locations to go to and read up on the pursuits of others in DIY audio, while EnABL dabbling.

And yes I am that particular person.

Bud
 

Attachments

Well the thing is I am not really digging down that low. I believe it is negligble at a certain point. I always see people talking about getting this super resolving systems yet all it seems to resolve are more errors and artifacts. And somehow my system is crap because I can not hear the artifacts or choose to ignore them.

I am too concerned with getting what's in that top 40dB to sound perfect - which imo is hard enough of a challenge.
 
I think at a certain point your mind fills in the gaps. Get rid of the glaring deficiencies and your mind can take care of the rest. Basically if I have to struggle to hear it then why am I struggling in the first place? To prove I have "golden ears"?

I understand what you are saying but I have heard some speakers with very different distortion measurements which sound identical to my ears.

Also my goal is to have reproduction accessible. So if it is too elusive or expensive of a process I tend to look elsewhere.
 
I think at a certain point your mind fills in the gaps. Get rid of the glaring deficiencies and your mind can take care of the rest. Basically if I have to struggle to hear it then why am I struggling in the first place? To prove I have "golden ears"?

I understand what you are saying but I have heard some speakers with very different distortion measurements which sound identical to my ears.

Also my goal is to have reproduction accessible. So if it is too elusive or expensive of a process I tend to look elsewhere.

Well maybe in your mind, but please do not speak for me or others that use and appreciate what the Bybee offers. If you feel that they do not improve your style of listening, that is your call. I feel that lowering the noise floor improves low level details, without adding harshness or disruptive side effects.

I do appreciate the fact that you do acknowledge that they do in fact offer improvements.
 
You just earned yourself a report for that post, and many of your previous posts as well.


Magura 🙂

If that makes you feel good then do what you must. I am simply tired of all the negativity thrown at people that can hear things and enjoy what they hear. You belittle audiophiles and, but then when the shoe is placed upon you you scream like a school girl. Fair is fair in my book. Decorum is non existent in this forum!
 
Last edited:
Curly attack the message not the messenger. Please try to keep it civil.

I have tried, but the continual inuindo and outright slandering is simply unacceptable to me. I guess others are either intimidated or afraid to speak their minds for fear they will be censored or removed. What good is a forum when ideas and thoughts can not be addressed and discuss with out attacks about ones credibility. You are correct Bas. I let my built up rage boil over. I just can not believe the level of bullying that happens in here at times.
 
Just looked at bybee. Time for a rant.

Electron slipstream? dosnt speeding up electron flow increase current? (dont take this personaly Curly) What a load of crap! My respect for John Curl just plummeted.

"During transit through the Quantum Purifier, quantum noise energy is stripped off the electrons, streamlining their flow through ensuing conductors." Streamlining there flow, wow. A full page about there technology but no hint how it works. And no data on how well it works.

"very low-level (quantum) noises are generated. As quantum noise energy accumulates in the propagating signal" How low? How about some numbers. Is it so low it dosnt come close to the thermal noise every component has? How dose it "acumulate", where does this energy come from?

"Quantum Purifiers were originally developed for military applications"
What applications? On antenaes pulling signals out of extreme noise? I bet its
not for audio.

So many questions, are there any answers

Sounds like the quantum tuneling excuse for solid wire cables.

Lets see, people are starting to understand electronics, so lets use quantum physics to sell them stuff that dosnt make any differeance. And quantum can mean expensive what a coup.
 
Just looked at bybee. Time for a rant.

Electron slipstream? dosnt speeding up electron flow increase current? (dont take this personaly Curly) What a load of crap! My respect for John Curl just plummeted.

"During transit through the Quantum Purifier, quantum noise energy is stripped off the electrons, streamlining their flow through ensuing conductors." Streamlining there flow, wow. A full page about there technology but no hint how it works. And no data on how well it works.

"very low-level (quantum) noises are generated. As quantum noise energy accumulates in the propagating signal" How low? How about some numbers. Is it so low it dosnt come close to the thermal noise every component has? How dose it "acumulate", where does this energy come from?

"Quantum Purifiers were originally developed for military applications"
What applications? On antenaes pulling signals out of extreme noise? I bet its
not for audio.

So many questions, are there any answers

Sounds like the quantum tuneling excuse for solid wire cables.

Lets see, people are starting to understand electronics, so lets use quantum physics to sell them stuff that dosnt make any differeance. And quantum can mean expensive what a coup.

Have you ever listened to them in your own system? How can you make such ridiculous statements about there worth without ever listening to them? I find that they lessen low level noise and allow the low level details to become much more obvious.
 
Lets see, people are starting to understand electronics, so lets use quantum physics to sell them stuff that dosnt make any differeance. And quantum can mean expensive what a coup.

John Curl has previously pointed out that Bybee's "explanations" are admittedly bogus for fear of tipping off competitors or possibly releasing defense secrets. So in absence of any forthcoming plausible explanations of mechanism of operation, we then must await the controlled subjective data before dismissing this as 100% bogus. Although it would seem to be in the interests of Bybee and his customers to provide these revolutionary and earth-shaking results, then buying a Rolls-Royce with all the money that would pour in from telecoms, this has yet to be done.

Unfortunately, all I've heard is the sound of crickets chirping...
 
John Curl has previously pointed out that Bybee's "explanations" are admittedly bogus for fear of tipping off competitors or possibly releasing defense secrets. So in absence of any forthcoming plausible explanations of mechanism of operation, we then must await the controlled subjective data before dismissing this as 100% bogus. Although it would seem to be in the interests of Bybee and his customers to provide these revolutionary and earth-shaking results, then buying a Rolls-Royce with all the money that would pour in from telecoms, this has yet to be done.

Unfortunately, all I've heard is the sound of crickets chirping...

CY why not try them for yourself?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.