Matching amplifiers
Gain / power driver sensitivity are all worth while aspects to plan for.
But I have found that matching the phase performance of power amps is the single most important aspect....
I have heard a lot of active systems....The best use identical power amps and use linear phase FIR filters.
Many valve and vinyl guys have tried to mix "valves up top and transistors down below" .....It never sounds a s good as using identical power amps.
Hope this helps.
Derek.
Gain / power driver sensitivity are all worth while aspects to plan for.
But I have found that matching the phase performance of power amps is the single most important aspect....
I have heard a lot of active systems....The best use identical power amps and use linear phase FIR filters.
Many valve and vinyl guys have tried to mix "valves up top and transistors down below" .....It never sounds a s good as using identical power amps.
Hope this helps.
Derek.
I'm planning to build the Linkwitz LX 521.4. Supposed to be one of the best sounding systems with one of the best minds doing the design. I think most of the gain, driver sensitivity etc. has been discussed in their forum.
I just want the best possible results so I'm shooting for identical amplifiers.
I just want the best possible results so I'm shooting for identical amplifiers.
labjr,
If you don't need more than 100 watts per channel go to the vendor thread and take a look at Lazy Cat's First One amplifier modules.
If you don't need more than 100 watts per channel go to the vendor thread and take a look at Lazy Cat's First One amplifier modules.
I'm planning to build the Linkwitz LX 521.4. Supposed to be one of the best sounding systems with one of the best minds doing the design. I think most of the gain, driver sensitivity etc. has been discussed in their forum.
I just want the best possible results so I'm shooting for identical amplifiers.
I heard them at Linkwitz's house. He and his gracious wife are as down to earth as he is smart.
And the speakers?...... They are simply outstanding and far better than anything i have heard by a huge margin
labjr,
If you don't need more than 100 watts per channel go to the vendor thread and take a look at Lazy Cat's First One amplifier modules.
Thanks for the info. Looks like the First One modules would be about the minimum needed since it appears they are about 100w @ 4 ohm. Some of the drivers have a sensitivity around 85 dB.
I heard them at Linkwitz's house. He and his gracious wife are as down to earth as he is smart.
And the speakers?...... They are simply outstanding and far better than anything i have heard by a huge margin
Cool. I'd love to be able to attend the open house May 14-15. Nelson Pass will be stopping by. I wish I could audition them myself. Haven't been able to find anyone in Boston area who's built them. Would also be nice to build systems and get together with other builders too. However, there's probably a limited number of people interested in such a project.
labjr,
Lazy Cat is working on a higher powered version but hasn't announced the release date yet. If you want to build something yourself then look at the Slewmaster thread, those amps can go over 200 watts per channel with the correct output devices.
Lazy Cat is working on a higher powered version but hasn't announced the release date yet. If you want to build something yourself then look at the Slewmaster thread, those amps can go over 200 watts per channel with the correct output devices.
< 1K USD = 1/2~1/3 of what I was expecting This is gonna be big and popular. Can't wait.
Just to clarify, this is for the DSP board alone. Other boards will be significantly cheaper and the total cost will depend on the end configuration. For example a minimal system may just need a USB audio interface in which case you don't need the digital audio IO board and analog audio board. Also you may only need unbalanced RCA's or balanced XLR board but not both. However you will still need the power supply board, user controls board and LCD display but these are not big ticket items. Throw in a remote control as well.
In any case it is a complete solution and you don't need to spend extra on external I-V converters or DAC boards etc.
cheers
david
labjr,
Lazy Cat is working on a higher powered version but hasn't announced the release date yet. If you want to build something yourself then look at the Slewmaster thread, those amps can go over 200 watts per channel with the correct output devices.
I'm open minded. I'm looking for reasonably priced amps with good performance. It's hard to tell what is good in the DIY market? Would be nice if the Hypex modules were more reasonably priced too. 10 channels would be expensive.
Did I read yesterday's Facebook update correctly that the Rev-B2 with new ADC will soon be ready? Will you soon be able to evaluate your test unit with the analog input board incorporated?
I will have to build the analog board which is one board I have not submitted to the pcb fabricators. It will probably need some changes as an after thought to having replaced the original ADC. However I can still test the ADC without the analog board.
cheers
david
I'm open minded. I'm looking for reasonably priced amps with good performance. It's hard to tell what is good in the DIY market? Would be nice if the Hypex modules were more reasonably priced too. 10 channels would be expensive.
Hypex have some multi-channel amp modules aimed at active speakers 😉
cheers
david
Hypex have some multi-channel amp modules aimed at active speakers 😉
Can you send the link, please? I couldn't find it on their site.
Can you send the link, please? I couldn't find it on their site.
They have recently announced a range of Ncore based multi-channel amps.
Unfortunately for DIYers they are OEM only.
I think there are a few low powered UcD amps available
https://www.hypexshop.com/DetailServlet?detailID=4929
Can you send the link, please? I couldn't find it on their site.
Hypex Electronics :: Products :: Amplifiers :: Mains Powered Amplifiers
cheers
30W at 1% distortion doesn't seem very useful for much.
I'm keeping the ES9018 Sabre DAC in the design. Firstly unlike the Sabre ADC which was a flop the Sabre DAC is a well established part and has been around for quite some time and used in a lot of hi-end products. Secondly I have invested too much time into designing it in. Thirdly it has some outstanding features built into the silicon which are just not available on other DAC's and well worth the premium price. Lastly I have been evaluating it on a prototype that I have recently completed, and for the last two weeks using speakers and headphones and it is a truly superb sounding DAC. 😉
cheers
![]()
![]()
![]()
This is a very neat project, this must have taken years of experience to complete.
Curious
You using a CPLD ? interesting what is its purpose ?
Has this project died? Nearly four weeks and nothing. Is there any progress?
No it is not dead ! These days I just post minor updates on my facebook page rather than bog up the forum all of the time. Progress is going well 😉
cheers
david
On another note does anyone know of a suitable remote control that I can standardize on ? It has to have the following features:-
NEC RC protocol
BUTTONS:- Left, Right, Up, Down, Enter, Mute, Standby
I have tried a plastic Apple RC from ebay but it doesn't appear to be NEC protocol.
cheers
NEC RC protocol
BUTTONS:- Left, Right, Up, Down, Enter, Mute, Standby
I have tried a plastic Apple RC from ebay but it doesn't appear to be NEC protocol.
cheers
Hmmm, wikipedia says the Apple remote is NEC IR protocol... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple_Remote
<snip>
Cheers!
<snip>
<\snip>The Apple Remote uses an NEC IR protocol[1] which consists of a differential PPM encoding on a 1:3 duty cycle 38 kHz 950 nm infrared carrier. There are 32 bits of encoded data between the AGC leader and the stop bit:[12]
Cheers!
- Home
- Vendor's Bazaar
- Hi-end DSP based multi-channel integrated Preamp/Crossover/DAC project