Help with modeling box for Faital 18HP1060

I bought this Faital 18HP1060 sub speaker recently and now I am trying to figure out the best box alignment. I am using Jeff Bagby's Excel sheet to model.

Can anyone on the forum give me feedback if the design makes sense or not before I waste a lot of time and wood?
I was also modeling for a FB of 30 Hz, but the box just turned out to be too big for the lowered F3 and the gain of a few Hz lower did not make sense.
I intent to drive this with a 3e-audio TPA3255 single channel amp from an active crossover. I modeled excursion with an input of 300W, which is more than I will ever use, even when running this rig outside in the meadow.

Any serious feedback is appreciated and thanks to Jeff (RIP) and Charlie Laub for providing the software (and the excellent DSELF designed preamp).


A link to the excel sheet is included below from my google drive.



https://drive.google.com/file/d/1A719Kljt01qW8M3FocJKQ6jT0-wCvxHO/view?usp=sharing


Thanks!
 
Greets!

Hmm, I immediately saw that the Sd, Vas specs are much smaller, so no point in going further till corrected: FaitalPRO | LF Loudspeakers | 18HP1060

That said, 'best' overall from a power handling Vs transient response is a Vb = measured Vas [or at least published]/1.44 tuned to actual Fs, though with only 300 W on tap it can be safely tuned to 32 Hz with a simmed ~115 dB/m/2pi/27.5 Hz, the lowest note on a standard piano.

For a low vent mach, an 8" dia. vent is required.

GM
 
I found the reason for the discrepancy in some of the small signal parameters: The data sheet on the website was updated in July - the one I used was from a few month earlier. I am surprised about the update since this speaker has been around for a while. Makes me wonder if the manufacturing process has changed.
In the end, the differences in the simulation did not seem too big.