Help pick a 1.4" compression driver

The 1.4" driver with a 15" driver is a very reasonable choice, typically the sweetspot IMO for performance in typical home hifi applications in the mid-range and in particular with 2 way systems. The 1 inch generally have less LF capability and more distortion if played low, the 2 inch generally doesn't have the HF extension or as flat an overall FR. This is of course a generalization, and there are drivers that perform better than expected for the specific format. YMMV may vary.
thank you. This is what I was assuming. I can always add a smaller supertweeter if I need HF extension. Or just make a shelf filter when I pad down the HF driver to match the level of the 15".
 
hmm.. i am leaning towards the Faital Pro HF146. Not the R version. Cost is less than the others and sounds like the polymer has a smoother sound. Plus it will be then an all Faital Pro speaker system. Thoughts? It will be matched to Crowe Audio ES600 horn.

Not a bad driver but sounded a little dull compared to the Radian 745. The Radian sounds good but doesn't have the resolution of the ND3SN. All drivers eq'd as similar as possible.

Depends on your hearing whether the top octave matters that much to you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arez
Way out of date, but curious how Altec's once best of the bunch large format (1.4") 288-8G on a 300 Hz expo horn fares with these newer ones.

288-8G on a 329A-300 Hz expo horn.PNG
 
Not a bad driver but sounded a little dull compared to the Radian 745. The Radian sounds good but doesn't have the resolution of the ND3SN. All drivers eq'd as similar as possible.

Depends on your hearing whether the top octave matters that much to you.
Just looking to see on cost on availability of the 18sound ND3SN in the US? Also the Radian seems like it drops off like a rock at the HF. I was planning on doing a shelf filter on the HF146 to get a bit of the top end sparkle back.
 
Just looking to see on cost on availability of the 18sound ND3SN in the US? Also the Radian seems like it drops off like a rock at the HF. I was planning on doing a shelf filter on the HF146 to get a bit of the top end sparkle back.

I've been getting drivers from France at cheaper prices than domestic sources....even with shipping. But it doesn't look like the 18 Sound is available until March and it's expensive elsewhere.

Honestly, most drivers of a given size and quality will get the job done. The differences after eq may or may not matter based on your ocd levels.
 
Can't talk to the Radian 745neoBe unfortunately, but I do have a pair of TAD TD-4001 with OEM BE diaphragms running on the previously mentioned A-290 clones. The level of detail with the TADs / Be diaphragms is on another level from the 2440/2441 or Radian 950neo. I had a lot of problems getting the Radian to integrate properly with those horns. (Lots written elsewhere) Suffice it to say there are a limited number of drivers that work well with the A-290.

Aluminum seems a lot more forgiving generally than Be. It is important that the driver exit angle matches the horn entry angle requirements.
 
Aluminum seems a lot more forgiving generally than Be. It is important that the driver exit angle matches the horn entry angle requirements.
Have you actually done some comparative listening tests with AL and Be diaphragms with you great and not great quality recordings? If yes, please share any details.

Regarding driver exit and horn entry geometries, are you saying this is largely or wholly dependent on the driver throat adapter?
 
  • Like
Reactions: kevinkr
Have you actually done some comparative listening tests with AL and Be diaphragms with you great and not great quality recordings? If yes, please share any details.

Regarding driver exit and horn entry geometries, are you saying this is largely or wholly dependent on the driver throat adapter?
Indirect comparison of 2440 with 2441 OEM Al diaphragms, Radian Neo 950PB Al, and TAD-4001 with OEM Be diaphragms is as close as I got. In measurements the 4001 is more extended in the HF, but at least on the A290 clones this wasn't a benefit I could use because even with DSP it was harsh. The "2441" actually sounded pretty good, but distortion was much higher (both measured and in listening.) Do a search for a couple of threads where this is discussed. (I would provide links but I am a bit short on time.)

I think 1.4" drivers with the appropriate adaptor are a good way to go if you are using an older horn design like the A-290 which was designed for drivers with narrow exit angles. (say 8° - 12° ?)

DSP can't fix something that is fundamentally broken due to bad choices.

Note that I consider myself to be relatively inexperienced and am still figuring things out. I'm no expert, just have had some relatively bad experiences with 2 inch drivers. 😀
 
Last edited:
I ended up going with the SB Audience 65-CDNT . For price can't really fault it. Its no TAD but again $$.
May I ask what horn you're using with it? Which tube and/or solid state amp (s)?

And on scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the least forgiving of your less than pristine recordings, how would you rate that driver/horn combination?

Did you find this driver's overall tonality in any way reminding you or other drivers, even non-compression cone drivers?

Do you have this driver/horn on your short or long wall?
 
Last edited: