Yeah, but it could only be optimized for a tonearm of a certain length.And perhaps the cut could be optimized for radial tonearms instead of linear ones. 😉
Maybe they would make different pressings for turntables with different tonearm lengths. Yeah, that's the ticket.
We could call it a LaserDisc!‘pulsed high-energy Femto-laser’
Woo-hoo!
Oh, wait...
You're all correct, except perhaps for the last sentence. With the right marketing, just about anything can "fly."Interesting notion, but presumably it can do nothing about cartridge non-linearity, crosstalk, etc.
Nor indeed wow-n-flutter induced by warps & cart/arm resonance. There seems to be nothing in the article about the final vinyl being super-flat.
In view of that, I don't think HD is the right word.
I don't think this idea is going to fly.
The "advantage" seems to be that a growing number of people WANT something to play with a phono cartridge on their ($50 Amazon) turntable. And if it's "HD" and "compatible with your current turntable," so much the better!On one hand we have ELP laser reading system of vinyl. And now a digital high resolution vinyl cutting system. If we remove the step of analogus playing of vinyl. Presto ! We would have a CD player. So is the playing with phono cartridge on the turntable the only advantage ?
Regards