i have a Monolith Magnetics S9 amorphous to come , as i already had the S9 HIB model before with my 2A3 Monoblock amp , i will tell if it worth the extra price or not 🙂
i have a Monolith Magnetics S9 amorphous to come , as i already had the S9 HIB model before with my 2A3 Monoblock amp , i will tell if it worth the extra price or not 🙂
As mains power transformer or output transformer?
i made an isolation power traffo, 500 va, 240:240 vac using biffilar winding
isolation AND bifilare ?
Either it is "isolation" or "bifilare", you cannot have both
Yes you can, triple insulated wire recommended, test with megger and really good varnish impregnation (vacuum preferred).isolation AND bifilare ?...
isolation AND bifilare ?
Either it is "isolation" or "bifilare", you cannot have both
hey this is DIY and we are allowed to do crazy stuff, i wanted to find out how it will work.....it worked, but i am not doing it again? 😱
folks, do not do as i did, not recommended...😎
yesterday I did change the choke from 2H small EI to 10H( large EI ) and figured out that the detailing in the entire spectrum was lost. It didn't have the charm that was there before the change. I have also changed the heater power supply from AC to DC ( non regulated just filters 10,000uF/16V ) for each heater. I think its because of the DC heater supply. If using an amorphous core would change the sound It will be nice.
I would be trying an amorphous choke. I'm expecting a better improvement with that.
I would be trying an amorphous choke. I'm expecting a better improvement with that.
Yes you can, triple insulated wire recommended, test with megger and really good varnish impregnation (vacuum preferred).
Will give you a "garbage in - garbage out" transformer, not exactly what I would call a isolation transformer
yesterday I did change the choke from 2H small EI to 10H( large EI ) and figured out that the detailing in the entire spectrum was lost.
I have had similar observations and always try to get away with as few Henry as possible. The C-core chokes often have the option of parallel or series connection and the parallel always sounds better to me.
When experimenting with amorhous chokes keep in mind a substantially larger core is required for the same current rating vs steel laminations. Choke input connections also become more problematic. Unfortunately, when Lundahl introduced amorhous core chokes they did not increase the cross section.
Will give you a "garbage in - garbage out" transformer, not exactly what I would call a isolation transformer
sadly this is true....
isolation in these cases is meant "galvanic" isolation, induction coupling like any other coupling does not discriminate.....
i have done other isolation traffos wherein i used electrostatic shielding between primary and secondary, between core and primary, etc...
a better way all around...
I think thats what some of the users of Lars amplifiers have expressed that the bass is not having weight. Probably Lundhal could have used larger cores. For low frequency weight yes we need bigger cores.I have had similar observations and always try to get away with as few Henry as possible. The C-core chokes often have the option of parallel or series connection and the parallel always sounds better to me.
When experimenting with amorhous chokes keep in mind a substantially larger core is required for the same current rating vs steel laminations. Choke input connections also become more problematic. Unfortunately, when Lundahl introduced amorhous core chokes they did not increase the cross section.
NP Acoustics sell Amorphous/ Metglas Core Transformers of most types needed
Product & Price - NP Acoustic
Product & Price - NP Acoustic
Product & Price - NP Acoustic
Product & Price - NP Acoustic
- Home
- Amplifiers
- Tubes / Valves
- Has anyone tried Metglass C-Cores in Audio Transformers ?