Better to use 'waste felt' with a internal or external ( it doesn't matter) net
The cute long nails used to append rock fiber matasse that you can find on old speaker building picture book
The cute long nails used to append rock fiber matasse that you can find on old speaker building picture book
And rigid
A hanging pioece of fiberglass wall insultation hung from the top and fixed at the bottom is sufficietly ridged.
dave
Reminds me of a case around 1980 where a large onken bass reflex (large cabinet, 15" driver, large slit type openings next to driver) was used (festival du son, Paris) and to dampen the enclosure standing waves thick felt sheets were hung in the enclosure. It worked to a certain extend. (Jean Hiraga, l' audiophile)Over the years I read here and there about a old speaker type called a boffle.
It consists of a open backed box with many felt curtains with different sized holes behind the driver. Here are some images to illustrate what it looks like
View attachment 1405586
View attachment 1405587
The idea is to "eat away the back wave" to emulate a infinite baffle.
My question is this, wouldn't it be better to use CLD material (constrained layer damping) in stead of felt curtains......or CLD material covered in felt?
In my mind CLD dividers would suck more energy out of the back wave, especially at low frequencies. I could make sheets from bitumen sandwiched between thin metal plates covered with thin automotive felt....
Is it worth a try?
http://p10hifi.net/tlinespeakers/forum/boffle-RadioElectronics.pdf
Wrt to cld with felt, in those days to dampen resonances in tube of pick-up arm of record player, a lightweight solution was to apply a thin layer of felt covered by a thin adhesive tape layer. Worked extremely well, but visually not very attractive.
Look at car damping solutions, quite often a felt - bitumen like material is combined into a sheet or blanket and depending where used also a layer of plastic or thin aluminium applied to increase the damping result.
So in short it will do something, but if it is satisfying i am not sure.
The proposals for baffles suggested two things:
Some of these sound a lot like a furnace filter
(though I still think Roxul Comfortboard is a more likely material
Perhaps for experimentation, the interior of the enclosure could be slotted to accept baffles in various positions. With a removable side, you could easily try lots of different materials and schemes.
Some of these sound a lot like a furnace filter
(though I still think Roxul Comfortboard is a more likely material
Perhaps for experimentation, the interior of the enclosure could be slotted to accept baffles in various positions. With a removable side, you could easily try lots of different materials and schemes.