Okay, I take it you refer to Climate change "BY US" conspiracy vs Climate change "BY US" denial conspiracy.Climate change conspiracy is promoted by the majority of scientist studying climatology as it pads their wallets.
Climate change denial conspiracy is promoted by the energy industry (Big Oil, etc) to cover up their destruction of the environment while they pad their wallets.
Which is more plausible?
There is no controversy regarding climate change per se. Seems to be lots of confusion out there about this.
Gee Scott, that’s some serious trans-dimensional Zeta grade geeking going on there - well done.
Only for easily confused people. Most accept that anthropogenic is implied, unless they are ones attempting to confuse the issue.Seems to be lots of confusion out there about this.
Just checking, you never know, most people are easily confused. DIY has limited membership.Only for easily confused people. Most accept that anthropogenic is implied, unless they are ones attempting to confuse the issue.
I did have to look up that word btw🙂
Last edited:
Climate change conspiracy is promoted by the majority of scientist studying climatology as it pads their wallets.
They really should do a better job of it, because the pay, relative to industry jobs, is pretty terrible. 😉
How do you know what the amount is?They really should do a better job of it, because the pay, relative to industry jobs, is pretty terrible. 😉
Climate change conspiracy is promoted by the majority of scientist studying climatology as it pads their wallets.
Climate change denial conspiracy is promoted by the energy industry (Big Oil, etc) to cover up their destruction of the environment while they pad their wallets.
Which is more plausible?
Neither, its the worlds first global tax.
Gee Scott, that’s some serious trans-dimensional Zeta grade geeking going on there - well done.
Well the correct answer was Ranagarian quail, no veganism there. 🙂
Compared to fossil fuel companies, so many people are getting rich in the areas of research, academia and non-profits due to climate change. We should post all their salaries. I forgot how much research grants pay the researchers. Typically 200 to 300K per year, I think. And who funds the climate denier studies? I believe it is mostly small business. Conspiracy theories, if you disagree with something it must be a conspiracy, right? The Caravan will destroy the U.S.A. and is full of terrorists. It could not be a total hateful domestic terrorist, sparked to action by political vitriol that shot people or mailed bombs, it must be a False Flag to swing the vote?
You mean it's about money again? Jeeeez...Neither, its the worlds first global tax.

More accurately, it's due to climate change movement.Compared to fossil fuel companies, so many people are getting rich in the areas of research, academia and non-profits due to climate change.
Someone here just stated that it (amount) is pretty terrible.We should post all their salaries.
Knowing quite a few academics, the idea that they entered academia for the increased earning potential cracks me up.
Really? What part do you find difficult to understand?
The inconvenient parts.
I'm a postdoc (whoop-de-doo), but as a point of reference, I am EASILY =< 1/2 my industry standard salary.
Just did a quick search for University of California system compensation -- full tenured prof in engineering (where they definitely pay better than elsewhere in the uni) is around 130k-150k. Remember cost of living and such is pretty high there, too, so this is on the higher end of the spectrum. So that's at/below the cost of a senior engineer in the same region, and the prof is payed far far better than the postdocs/staff scientists/students/research assistants that do a majority of the work.
Last edited:
I didn't say anything about not understanding what he stated. Did you understand what my reply meant?Really? What part do you find difficult to understand?
I'm not sure what relevance that has with what's being discussed.
I didn't say anything about not understanding what he stated. Did you understand what my reply meant?
My bad, I obviously don't understand English.
- Status
- Not open for further replies.
- Home
- Member Areas
- The Lounge
- Global Warming/Climate Change hoax